BBC: Sikh granny’s arrest by US immigration sparks community anger

The visiting room of the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Centre in Bakersfield, California, is small, loud, and crowded. When Harjit Kaur’s family arrived to see her, they could barely hear her – and the first words they caught shattered them.

“She said, ‘I would rather die than be in this facility. May God just take me now’,” recalled her distraught daughter-in-law, Manjit Kaur.

Harjit Kaur, 73, who unsuccessfully applied for asylum in the US, and has lived in California for more than three decades, was arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials on 8 September, sparking shock and sympathy from the Sikh community across the state and beyond.

Harjit Kaur had filed several asylum appeals over the years which were rejected, with the last denial in 2012, her lawyer said.

Since then, she had been asked to report to immigration authorities every six months. She was arrested in San Francisco when she had gone for a check-in.

It comes amid a wider crackdown by the Donald Trump administration on immigration, and especially alleged illegal immigrants in the US.

The issue is a sensitive one – the country is grappling with how to deal with the hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers who arrive at its borders every year. More than 3.7 million asylum cases are pending in immigration courts. An increased budget for immigration enforcement means ICE is now the highest-funded federal law enforcement agency.

Trump has said he wants to deport the “worst of the worst”, but critics say immigrants without criminal records who follow due process have also been targeted.

“Over 70% of people arrested by ICE have no criminal conviction,” said California State Senator Jesse Arreguin in a statement demanding Harjit Kaur’s release. “Now, they are literally going after peaceful grandmothers. This shameful act is harming our communities.”

US Congressman John Garamendi, who represents the Californian district where Harjit Kaur lives, has submitted a request to ICE for her release.

“This administration’s decision to detain a 73-year-old woman – a respected member of the community with no criminal record who has faithfully reported to ICE every six months for more than 13 years – is one more example of the misplaced priorities of Trump’s immigration enforcement,” a spokesperson said.

In an emailed statement, ICE told the BBC that Harjit Kaur had “exhausted decades of due process” and that an immigration judge had ordered her removal in 2005.

“Harjit Kaur has filed multiple appeals all the way up to the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals and LOST each time. Now that she has exhausted all legal remedies, ICE is enforcing US law and the orders by the judge; she will not waste any more US tax dollars,” it added.

Harjit Kaur came to the US in 1991 with her two minor sons after the death of her husband, her lawyer Deepak Ahluwalia told the BBC. Her daughter-in-law Manjit Kaur said that the young widow wanted to shield her sons from and escape the political turbulence in India’s Punjab state at the time.

Over the next three decades, she worked modest jobs to raise her sons, one of whom is now a US citizen. Her five grandchildren are also US citizens.

Harjit Kaur, who lives in Hercules city in the San Francisco Bay Area, was working as a seamstress at a sari store for the past two decades and pays her taxes. Asylum applicants across the US are allowed to live, work and pay taxes legally once their claim is officially filed and in process.

Even after her final asylum appeal was rejected in 2012, her job permit was renewed every year.

After the rejection, her deportation seemed imminent, but she didn’t have the right documents to travel to India.

Indian missions in the US issue emergency certificates – a one-way travel document – to Indians of invalid status to enable them to return. This would require verifying Harjit Kaur’s origin and identity in Punjab through photos, cross-checking with relatives or acquaintances or finding old records, which would take at least a few weeks.

More than a decade since the rejection, neither Harjit Kaur nor US immigration officials have been able to get a travel permit for her. Manjit Kaur said they visited the Indian consulate in San Francisco in 2013 for this but didn’t succeed. India’s Consul General at San Francisco K Srikar Reddy told the BBC they had no record of Harjit Kaur applying for travel documents to India.

ICE did not respond to a question about why it did not get a travel permit in the past 13 years.

Mr Ahluwalia said he is following up with the Indian consulate for the documents which “ICE was unable to procure for the last 13 years”. The consulate says they are “facilitating all necessary consular assistance”.

Harjit Kaur’s family, meanwhile, say she never questioned her deportation and should not have been detained.

“Provide us the travel documents and she is ready to go,” Manjit Kaur said. “She had even packed her suitcases back in 2012.”

Right now, their immediate concern is getting her out of the detention centre.

“You can put an ankle monitor on her. We can check in with immigration when you want,” said Manjit Kaur. “Just get her out of the facility and when you provide us the travel documents, she will self-deport to India.”

Her lawyer said that when he met Harjit Kaur on 15 September, she had not been provided with her regular medication. He alleged that she had been “dragged by guards”, “denied a chair or a bed” and was “forced to sit on the floor” for hours in a holding cell despite having undergone double knee replacement.

He also alleged that she was “explicitly refused water” and not provided a vegetarian meal for the first six days.

ICE did not respond to specific questions on these allegations, but had earlier told BBC Punjabi that “it is a long-standing policy that as soon as someone comes into ICE custody, they are given full health care”.

Detainees have access to “medical appointments and 24-hour emergency care” and no-one “is denied essential care at any time during detention”, it added.

Kulvinder Singh Pannu, president of the gurdwara committee at The Sikh Centre in San Francisco Bay Area, says that Bibi Harjit (a respectful way to refer to an elderly Punjabi woman) is well-liked in the area.

“She always helped people in our community with whatever she had financially,” he said.

“A couple of hundred people turned up by themselves to protest against her arrest,” he said, referring to a 12 September agitation outside the Sikh temple in California.

As the uncertainty continues, Harjit Kaur’s supporters are planning to hold more protests, including in other US cities, with many saying they are touched by her plight.

A single mother, Harjit Kaur had formed deep roots and relationships in the US over the past 30 years. Her parents and siblings in India are no longer alive, says Mr Ahluwalia.

“She has no-one, no home, no land to return to.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgq63lgn7zo

Hollywood Reporter: Trump’s Attack on ABC Is Illegal. It Might Not Matter

The carrot or the stick? Trump has utilized every lever of government to target networks critical of him.

The chain of events that led to ABC’s suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! unfolded unusually fast. It started with a thinly-veiled threat from Federal Communications Chair Brendan Carr that his agency might take action against the network over accusations that the late night host mischaracterized the politics of the man who allegedly killed Charlie Kirk.

“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” he said to right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson. “These companies can find ways to change conduct, on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”

Within five hours, Nextstar, an owner of ABC affiliate stations around the country, said that it would pre-empt the show “for the foreseeable future.” Minutes later, ABC pulled it indefinitely.

Since the start of his second term, President Trump has used every lever of government to fight back against what he considers conservative bias in mainstream media and adversarial coverage. By dangling carrots of selective regulatory enforcement and favorable regulation, he’s effectively been able to strongarm networks, which disguise the could-be censorship as private business decisions. Consider Skydance’s acquisition of Paramount, with CEO David Ellison intending to make major changes at CBS News, possibly by bringing on The Free Press founder Bari Weiss in a leading role at the network.

Kimmel was “fired because of bad ratings more than anyone else,” Trump, who predicted the late night host’s firing in July, said at a press conference in London. Later, he suggested revoking the licenses of adversarial broadcast networks. “I would think maybe their licenses should be taken away,” he said. Carr also told CNBC earlier in the morning that “we’re not done yet,” hinting at further changes in media.

And like approval of Paramount’s sink-or-swim merger with Skydance, Kimmel’s suspensions shines a spotlight on the power that Trump wields over dealmaking and regulatory matters in decisions with the potential to transform the long term trajectory of a company. Media execs are on notice: Bob Iger allowed ABC News’ settlement of a defamation lawsuit from Trump; Jeff Bezos revamped The Washington Post‘s opinion section to bring it more in line with Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal; Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong shifted the paper’s strategy to increasingly platform conservative views.

Here, Carr knew the affiliate networks had leverage. Nextstar reaches 220 millions viewers in the country, and it appears the company drew a hard line over Kimmel’s remarks. The FCC didn’t formally have to do anything.

“The threat is real,” says Floyd Abrams, a leading First Amendment lawyer who’s argued more than a dozen free speech cases before the Supreme Court.

To Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of U.C. Berkeley School of Law, lines were clearly crossed. “The government, including the FCC, never can impose sanctions for the views expressed,” he says. “But that is exactly what Carr threatened and ABC capitulated.”

Important to note: Nextstar is seeking regulatory approval for its $6.2 billion megamerger with Tegna that, if greenlit, would make it by far the largest owner of local TV stations in the country. But first, the FCC has to raise the 40 percent ownership cap in order to advance the deal.

By pre-empting Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Nextstar was able to curry favor with Carr. The company “stood up and said, ‘Look, we have the license, and we don’t want to run this anymore. We don’t think it serves the interests of our community,’” he said during a Wednesday segment on FOX News’ Hannity. “I’m very glad to see that America’s broadcasters are standing up to serve the interests of their community.”

Yes, Carr’s threat likely violates the First Amendment, legal scholars say, but that only matters if Disney is willing to go to court. The entertainment giant had clear incentives to fold. It has ambitions, perhaps ones that will require regulatory approval in the near future, outside of ABC. There’s the looming threat of government retaliation if it didn’t suspend Kimmel.

Recently, Disney has tried to avoid the partisan political fray. By its thinking, its brand is built on fairytales and fantasies, not taking positions on socially divisive topics, which have come with consequences (Conservatives go to Disney World too). Take the company, under pressure from its employees, criticizing a Florida education barring classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity. State legislators, at the direction of Gov. Ron DeSantis, responded by assuming control of the special tax district that encompasses its 25,000-acre resort. A years-long, bitter feud with its most vital partner for its parks business that likely contributed to former chief executive Bob Chapek’s ouster and a dragging stock price, which culminated in a proxy fight with activist investor Nelson Peltz, followed.

If it does sue, which is very unlikely, Disney could lean on precedent created by an unlikely ally: The National Rifle Association. In a case before the Supreme Court last year, the justices unanimously found that the gun group’s First Amendment rights were violated when New York state officials coerced private companies into blacklisting it. The takeaway, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, is that the constitution “prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech.”

There are obvious parallels, says Eugene Volokh, a professor at U.C.L.A. law school and influential conservative blogger. “It’s clear that the FCC used coercive pressure — the threat of investigation or cancelling the Nextstar, Tegna merger,” he says.

It’s true that Kimmel’s remarks about the political affiliation of Kirk’s shooter were incorrect. It matters to get things right. But Carr’s intervention thrusts the FCC — and government — into a miscast role as the arbiter of truth. There’s a right to speculate on current events, even if it later turns out to be wrong.

“We’ve never been in a situation like this,” Abrams says. “It’s a real body blow to free expression.”

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/jimmy-kimmels-suspension-trump-era-first-amendment-threat-1236375335

Newsweek: Trump administration asks Supreme Court for new emergency order

The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to let it move forward with ending protections for more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants. The Justice Department is seeking to block a San Francisco judge’s ruling that found the administration acted unlawfully when it terminated Temporary Protected Status for the group.

A federal appeals court declined to halt U.S. District Judge Edward Chen’s decision while the case proceeds.

In May, the Supreme Court had already overturned another Chen order affecting about 350,000 Venezuelans, without explanation, as is typical for emergency appeals. Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices the earlier ruling should guide them again.

Why It Matters

The Trump administration has taken a hardline stance on Temporary Protected Status, arguing that the protections are meant to be temporary but have been abused by consecutive administrations. Immigration advocates have countered, saying that conditions in Venezuela and other countries have not improved enough to send people home.

What To Know

Friday’s plea by the Trump administration continues a cycle of court orders and challenges around the attempts by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to end TPS for two groups of Venezuelans.

“This case is familiar to the Court and involves the increasingly familiar and
untenable phenomenon of lower courts disregarding this Court’s orders on the emergency docket,” the administration wrote in its submission to the Supreme Court.

The argument is that Chen’s final order in the case rested on the same legal basis that had been stayed by the Supreme Court just months earlier.

This back-and-forth has left around 300,000 Venezuelans in limbo, alongside thousands more in a second group also facing the potential loss of their legal status.

Under TPS, immigrants from designated countries are allowed to remain in the United States without fear of deportation. They are granted permission to work while in the U.S., and can sometimes travel out of the country.

Noem and her predecessors hold the power to grant and revoke TPS per country. Status is renewed every 18 months, and the first Trump administration made similar attempts to revoke it but also faced legal challenges, which continued until President Joe Biden took office in 2021.

Part of Noem’s reasoning is that conditions in Venezuela have improved significantly, meaning it is safe for immigrants to return home. This has not necessarily aligned with the broader Trump administration’s views on the South American nation and its leader, Nicolas Maduro.

Trump Admin Moves to Revoke TPS for Syria

Also on Friday, the DHS moved to revoke TPS for another country: Syria.

In a Federal Register notice, the DHS reiterated that conditions had improved in the country, indicating that TPS was no longer necessary. Protections are set to lapse on September 30, 2025.

Protections were first introduced in 2012, at the height of the unrest in the Middle East at the time.

What People Are Saying

The Trump administration, in its filing to the Supreme Court Friday: “Since the statute was enacted, every administration has designated countries for TPS or extended those designations in extraordinary circumstances. But Secretaries across administrations have also terminated designations when the conditions
were no longer met.”

Adelys Ferro, co-founder and executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, told Newsweek on August 29: “We, more than 8 million Venezuelans, just didn’t leave the country just because it’s fun, it’s because we had no choice…Venezuelans with TPS are not a threat to the United States.”

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court must now decide whether to take up the appeal.

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-donald-trump-immigrants-deportation-venezuela-migrants-2132804

Fox Business: Texas Democrat files impeachment articles targeting Pam Bondi, Kash Patel [Video]

Rep. Laurel Lee, R-Fla., discusses the seriousness of articles of impeachment filed against Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel on ‘Mornings with Maria.’

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-democrat-files-impeachment-articles-targeting-pam-bondi-kash-patel/vi-AA1MTMEj

Fox News: Trump launches $1M Gold Card for US residency status through government website

President Donald Trump on Friday announced the “Trump Gold Card,” which will allow individuals and corporations to receive rapid residency in the U.S., is now available for purchase with a starting price of $1 million.

The card features a portrait of the president, the Statue of Liberty and the American flag underneath a gold background, with “Trump Gold Card” stamped on the left side.

“For far too long, we have had millions of Illegal Aliens pouring into our Country, and our Immigration System was broken,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. “It is beyond time that the American People, and American Taxpayers, are benefitting from our LEGAL Immigration System.”

Individuals are now able to purchase the card for $1 million, and corporations will later be able to purchase a card for $2 million.

“We anticipate THE TRUMP GOLD CARD will generate well over $100 Billion Dollars very quickly,” Trump wrote. “This money will be used for reducing Taxes, Pro Growth Projects, and paying down our Debt.”

Interested parties can apply for the “exclusive privileges” on the official website, trumpcard.gov.

According to the site, applicants will submit their documents and pay a nonrefundable processing fee, triggering an accelerated probe by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

From there, officials will conduct an in-depth background check and vet the potential cardholder.

Once an applicant is approved, a Trump Gold Card will be available for use throughout all 50 states and territories. They will be given lawful permanent resident status as an EB-1 or EB-2 visa holder.

The website notes that the Trump Gold Card status acts as a visa, and may be revoked due to national security and other risks.

The administration also plans to roll out the Trump Platinum Card, which will allow individual applicants to reside in the country for up to 270 days per year, without being subject to tax on non-U.S. income. It will take the place of travel visas.

While the platinum card has not yet been released, the website notes applicants should join the waitlist immediately, as they will be processed on a first-come-first-serve basis.

Only stinking rich white guys need apply!!!

https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-launches-1m-gold-card-us-residency-status-through-government-website

GO Banking Rates: Trump Said He Would End Inflation on Day 1 of His Presidency — See Where We Stand Now

On the campaign trail, then-candidate Donald Trump repeatedly promised to “end inflation on Day One” of his presidency.

“Starting on Day One of my new administration, we will end inflation, and we will make America affordable again,” the president said in at an October campaign rally in Saginaw, Michigan, per RollCall.

How well has the president kept that promise?

Inflation Since January

Over the eight months from January through August, the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate averaged 2.65%, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That remains higher than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%, but not egregiously so.

The problem for Trump — and all Americans — is the change in trend direction, not the average.

Inflation had been trending downward when Trump entered the White House in January. It dropped from 3.0% in January to 2.3% in April, and Trump has claimed many times that he has in fact defeated inflation. As recently as Sept. 8, he told WABC, “We have no inflation. Prices are down on just about everything.”

But inflation has been rebounding since April, rising from 2.3% to 2.9% in August. What changed?

Tariffs Trickling Down to Consumers

Through June, companies only passed on 22% of the heightened cost of imported goods to consumers, according to a Goldman Sachs analysis shared with Bloomberg.

Yet the bank warned that if the current tariff policies continue, that number will rise to 67%.

Sure enough, the latest CPI report found that grocery prices jumped 0.6% in August, the largest leap in three years. Apparel and audiovisual prices rose 0.5%, while car parts increased 0.6%. Coffee costs 20% more than it did a year ago.

Overall prices rose 0.4% in August, the largest monthly gain since December.

Ironically, President Trump may have actually been able to deliver on his campaign promise to curb inflation quickly, if it weren’t for sweeping tariffs. All Americans can do today is speculate on that point however, as inflation reaccelerates.

In a nutshell: Trend is upwards; total inflation was 0.4% (annualized rate 4.8%) in August.

Not good!!!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/trump-said-he-would-end-inflation-on-day-1-of-his-presidency-see-where-we-stand-now/ar-AA1MTakk

Alternet: ‘Go somewhere else’: Sheriff may file charges against Democrats over anti-Trump buttons

Members of the Ashland County, Ohio Democratic Party were recently escorted out of the county fair for displaying merchandise critical of President Donald Trump. And criminal charges could soon follow, according to the local sheriff.

Cleveland, Ohio-based ABC affiliate WEWS reported Friday that Ashland County Sheriff Kurt Schneider is contemplating filing criminal charges against the Democrats for displaying several buttons that he and other fairgoers found objectionable. WEWS reported that before the Democrats were escorted out, they were told to stop displaying the buttons. After several fairgoers continued to complain, deputies escorted the Democrats off of the fairgrounds.

One of the buttons in question shows a red baseball cap with “FELON” written on it, and the text “is he dead yet” underneath. Another button has a red baseball cap bearing the message “RESIST” with the caption “8647” (which is a reference to both a restaurant term to get rid of something on the menu and Trump being the 47th president of the United States).

Both Schneider and fairgoer Dan Kaufman viewed the buttons as “threatening,” and the sheriff said he had contacted the U.S. Secret Service over the buttons. He said he hadn’t ruled out pressing charges, but didn’t immediately specify what charges he was considering.

“Everybody can say anything, right? But then what are the consequences of what you say?” Schneider told WEWS. “This kind of nonsense, it can go somewhere else.”

State senator Bill DeMora (D) argued the buttons were protected speech, and blasted local authorities over their reaction.

“”This is censorship,” he said. “It’s a violation of the First Amendment right to free speech.”

“”[Schneider] is wrong and will lose any battle in court,” he added.

https://www.alternet.org/sheriff-democrats-trump-buttons

Independent: Reporter and House candidate Kat Abughazleh thrown to the ground by ICE as 400 arrested in Chicago

‘This is what it looks like when ICE violates our First Amendment rights,’ said Kat Abughazaleh

Kat Abughazaleh, a former journalist and Democratic congressional candidate, was thrown to the ground by an ICE agent during a protest in Chicago on Friday, with video of the incident going viral.

The 26-year-old running for Congress in Illinois’s 9th District in 2026 posted videos of the incident on X, writing, “This is what it looks like when ICE violates our First Amendment rights.”

In the first video, an armed agent grabs Abughazaleh around the chest and throws her onto the road, landing on her backside.

The other shows Abughazaleh seated on the street alongside other protestors wearing face masks and holding signs.

A group of ICE agents walks up to the group, and one picks up Abughazaleh, dragging her further back. She gets up to be shoved by other agents as multiple bystanders record the interaction.

“What ICE just did to me was a violent abuse of power — and it’s still nothing compared to what they’re doing to immigrant communities,” Abughazaleh added in another post. “I’ve been fighting the right as a journalist and now I’m running for Congress to do the same in DC.

“I hope you’ll join me in this fight,” she said, providing a link to her campaign website.

Some right-wingers appeared gleeful at the assault.

“I love watching communists get body slammed by ICE,” MAGA commentator Laura Loomer posted. “Communist and Palestinian. Pick a struggle.”

Abughazaleh first made a name for herself at Media Matters for America, where she drew attention for her sharp critiques of Fox News host Tucker Carlson. Her work has also appeared in outlets like Mother Jones and The New Republic.

“First off they shot pepper balls to the ground, and then said, ‘Your First Amendment rights are on the sidewalk,'” Abughazaleh told Newsweek. “And then when we tried to get in the way of the van, they picked us up or dragged us away, for some people, shoved people. I was picked up and thrown.”

“No one was violent. No one did anything that could possibly warrant being detained by federal officers. But they didn’t care,”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kat-abughazleh-ice-chicago-protest-b2830203.html

Axios: Trump to Harvard: Hand over race data or face enforcement

The Trump administration warned Harvard on Friday that it would “face further enforcement action” if it refuses to turn over more information about the university’s use of race in admissions.

Why it matters: The warning continues the administration’s push to exert broad control over America’s higher-learning institutions as Trump seeks to eradicate what he calls “anti-white racism,” a reinterpretation at odds with the nation’s history.

What they’re saying: “No one – not even Harvard – is above the law,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a press release.

  • “We will not allow any institution to disregard its obligation to uphold students’ civil rights.”
  • “The Trump Administration will continue to use all legal tools available to restore accountability and transparency to our nation’s institutions.”

Yes, but: The Education Department hasn’t said what “further enforcement action” would mean, leaving the scope of potential consequences vague.

  • The Education Department and Harvard did not respond to Axios’ request for comment.

Catch up quick: The Supreme Court ruled that colleges cannot consider an applicant’s race in the admissions process in 2023, effectively banning affirmative action.

  • Trump also signed a memo in August requiring federally funded higher-education institutions to submit applicant data.

Zoom in: The administration launched its admissions investigation in May. Since then, it has routinely singled-out Harvard.

Zoom out: Trump officials seek to eliminate the diversity, equity and inclusion policies intended to level the playing field for minorities in systems that once favored white people.

What we’re watching: The letter gives Harvard 20 days to hand over admissions data.

https://www.axios.com/2025/09/19/trump-harvard-race-admissions-data

Guardian: Man arrested by Ice dies in jail cell in Long Island, New York

Officials in Nassau county confirmed death of 42-year-old man to Newsday but declined to share details

A man arrested by US Customs and Immigration Enforcement (Ice) died in a Long Island, New York, jail on Thursday, according to a report.

Officials in Nassau county confirmed the death of a 42-year-old man to Newsday but declined to share details, saying that an investigation was under way.

“There is an ongoing investigation, which will be thorough and transparent to determine the cause of death,” the Nassau county sheriff, Anthony LaRocco, told the outlet. “Nassau county takes seriously its obligation to treat every prisoner humanely.”

The outlet reported that this is the first death of an Ice detainee in custody in Nassau county, where more than 1,400 people detained by the federal agency have been held between February and June this year.

A spokesperson for the office of the New York state attorney general, Letitia James, confirmed that it is conducting a preliminary assessment of the death.

Police arrived at the Nassau county correctional center in East Meadow on Thursday morning at around 6.30am to find the man “not breathing” after he was “observed in his cell unresponsive”.

At least 14 people have died in Ice custody in fiscal year 2025, which began in October 2024, according Ice figures. About 58,766 people have been detained this year, as of 7 September, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.

Nassau county, home to a large Salvadorian and Guatemalan population, entered into a partnership with Ice in February, allocating 50 local jail cells for Ice detainees. The man who died was being held as part of that partnership.

The Nassau county executive, Bruce Blakeman, said in July that “there is no evidence” to suggest anyone was being held longer than 72 hours, per the agreement with Ice. The official said the federal government was reimbursing the county $195 per Ice detainee, per night.

The publication New York Focus calculates that New York state’s county jails have held six times more people for immigration authorities than they did in 2024.

The state’s jail system booked a total of nearly 2,800 people arrested for immigration reasons in the first seven months of 2025, up from only 500 last year, according to Ice data.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/19/ice-death-long-island-ny