Inquisitr: Pete Hegseth ‘First to Be Fired’ as Trump Reportedly Sets Departure Date
Reply
Tag Archives: Frank Yemi
Inquisitr: Conservative Rick Wilson Warns MAGA Loyalists: Trump ‘Will Be Dead Sooner Than You Imagine’
Rick Wilson issues a grim warning to Trump’s loyalists about retribution.
Rick Wilson has never been one to hold back, but his latest Substack column went even further than usual. The longtime Republican strategist and outspoken Trump critic warned the former president’s most loyal followers that their leader will not be around forever, and that those who have helped him undermine democratic norms should prepare for consequences.
The column dropped the day before Donald Trump’s scheduled “routine yearly check-up” at Walter Reed Hospital, just five months after his last visit, fueling speculation about his health. Wilson did not mince words, tying the timing to his grim prediction. “You will not reign forever,” he wrote. “Your Dear Leader will be dead sooner than you imagine, given his failing health and corroded mind.”
Wilson’s warning was not just about Trump’s mortality, but about what he called the “reckoning” awaiting his inner circle. He accused Trump’s allies, from top officials to rank and file enforcers, of enabling what he described as an assault on American liberty. “The lawful power of the people will be used to deliver decisive, agonizing consequences,” he wrote. “Legal, political, economic, and social punishments are the only warning that will work.”
In the piece, Wilson also referenced Trump adviser Stephen Miller, calling him part of an effort to inflame public tensions to justify authoritarian crackdowns. He accused the administration of trying to provoke chaos so that Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act. “Donald Trump and his claque of pissant authoritarians have switched from wanna be to gonna be,” Wilson warned, adding that they were “itching to turn the United States military into their personal palace guard.”
The post also veered into disturbing imagery, with Wilson writing that Trump loyalists “can live their remaining days in an 8×8 cell or take a blindfold, a cigarette, and a wall.” He later framed his language as about accountability, not violence, but the line sparked outrage among Trump supporters and conservative media figures, who accused him of calling for political persecution.
Still, Wilson’s followers saw the essay as a blunt reality check for a movement that has grown used to acting with impunity. He argued that Trump’s cult of personality has shielded enablers from responsibility, but that eventually, when Trump’s influence fades, justice will catch up. “Those who betrayed this nation in the service of Trump,” he wrote, “will be tried and handed punishments so severe that generations to come will remember that America is, by its very DNA, engineered to destroy tyranny.”
Wilson’s rhetoric has long been divisive, but his prediction comes as Trump’s physical and political stamina face intense scrutiny. Between reports of repeated medical visits and observations about cognitive lapses, speculation about the former president’s health continues to swirl. For Wilson, that is part of his point, the “Dear Leader,” as he calls Trump, is not immortal, and when he is gone, his allies will not have his shadow to hide behind.
Whether seen as prophetic or provocative, Wilson’s words landed with force. His message to the MAGA faithful was unmistakable: Trump’s time will eventually end, and when it does, those who followed him blindly will face the consequences.
Conservative Rick Wilson Warns MAGA Loyalists: Trump ‘Will Be Dead Sooner Than You Imagine’ – Inquisitr News
Republican strategist Rick Wilson warns MAGA loyalists that Donald Trump ‘will be dead sooner than you imagine,’ predicting a day of reckoning.
http://inquisitr.com/conservative-rick-wilson-warns-maga-loyalists-trump-will-be-dead-sooner-than-you-imagine
We can only hope!
And it can’t happen soon enough!
Inquisitr: Trump Roasted As Immigrant Nobel Prize Winners Are Highlighted
The Wall Street Journal roasted Donald Trump in a scathing editorial.
Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal just handed Donald Trump a brutal reality check, and it did it by turning the spotlight on America’s newest Nobel stars. In a blistering editorial, the Journal’s board used this week’s science laureates to torch Trump’s immigration crackdown, arguing that the same immigrant pipelines he is trying to constrict are exactly what keep the United States competitive and inventive. “Welcoming immigrants to the U.S. is out of fashion on the political right these days,” the board wrote, “that’s short sighted for America’s future prosperity,” and the week’s Nobel roll call was Exhibit A.
Six U.S. residents were among nine Nobel winners in the sciences this year, and half of those U.S. based winners were immigrants. The board did not just toss out statistics, it named names, and the list was a pointed rebuke to restrictionism. French born Michel Devoret and British born John Clarke were highlighted alongside American researcher John Martinis for physics work involving quantum mechanical tunneling, a reminder that cutting edge labs often run on global talent.
Jordanian born Omar Yaghi, who fled his country as a refugee and learned English at a community college in Troy, New York, was hailed for chemistry breakthroughs in metal organic frameworks, the kind of next generation materials science that expands the frontier for energy, climate, and biotech.
The Journal’s message was not coy, immigrants are not an asterisk on the American science story, they are central to it. The editorial pointed to research showing that since 2000, immigrants account for roughly 40 percent of all U.S. based Nobel winners in physics, chemistry, and medicine, with an even higher share in physics and chemistry. “You never know who or how the poorest refugee or migrant might blossom into a world class scientist or entrepreneur,” the board wrote, calling immigration a “force multiplier” for U.S. innovation. For a paper often friendly to Republican tax and trade ideas, the tone was unmistakable, Trump’s immigration agenda is sabotaging the very prosperity case his party claims to champion.
Trump has been not so quietly campaigning for a Nobel Peace Prize of his own ahead of Friday’s announcement, pitching his foreign policy as prize worthy while his domestic policy targets the student visas, research visas, and legal pathways that feed American labs. The Journal warned that turning the screws on legal immigration, from hiking H 1B costs for startups to discouraging foreign student enrollment, will push future luminaries to study elsewhere, or to take their degrees and go home. You cannot lock the lab doors and expect the breakthroughs to keep walking in.
This was not a partisan blog calling Trump small minded, it was the house editorial voice of a Murdoch flagship telling the Republican frontrunner that his tough on immigration posture is a slow bleed on American dynamism. The board anticipated the standard defenses, that the White House only targets illegal immigration and that anecdotes are not data, then swatted them away. Anecdotes matter, because science advances one person at a time, one lab at a time, and those people often come from somewhere else before they choose to stay here and build.
Inquisitr: Epstein Victims Slam Kash Patel for Shocking Trafficking Remark
Survivors blast FBI chief Kash Patel’s “no credible info” line, demanding full release of Epstein files.
Jeffrey Epstein’s survivors are calling B.S. on Kash Patel. After two bruising days on Capitol Hill, the FBI director ignited a firestorm by testifying that the bureau has “no credible information” Epstein trafficked girls to anyone besides himself, a claim survivors say flies in the face of years of reports and interviews.
Patel made the remark under questioning from Sen. John Kennedy and later doubled down when pressed by Rep. Thomas Massie, insisting the FBI hasn’t found solid evidence of other culprits. The assertion sent the hearing into a tailspin, with lawmakers in both parties hammering Patel over transparency and his shifting stance on releasing the full Epstein files.
Within hours, a group of survivors and advocates unloaded. In a joint statement highlighted by national outlets, they said they were “shocked” and “struggling” to understand how Patel could wave away records and victim accounts naming powerful men. They pointed to long-public allegations from Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide in April at age 41, and to congressional references to FBI interview notes that purportedly identify at least 20 other men.
The survivors also accused Patel of punting to prior administrations whose credibility he himself has questioned in the past. If he hasn’t read the underlying reports or met the victims, they asked, why is he defaulting to old judgments that labeled key accounts “not credible”? Their bottom line: stop deflecting, release the witness interview memos, and meet with survivors who still haven’t been heard.
Capitol Hill isn’t done with Patel, either. Across two committees, he sparred with members over everything from alleged “cover-ups” to a 2003 birthday book for Epstein that Democrats say includes a sexually suggestive note tied to Donald Trump, one Patel said he’d review. Republicans, meanwhile, have leaned on Patel’s line that there’s no verified “client list,” even as they demand more documents.
Context matters. Prince Andrew settled Giuffre’s civil suit in 2022 without admitting liability, a reminder that powerful names have already been dragged into legal proceedings around Epstein’s orbit. And Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted accomplice, was transferred in late July to a minimum-security prison camp, a move now under congressional scrutiny as survivors decry leniency and demand full disclosure of what she told the Department of Justice.
Patel’s defenders argue he’s just stating the status of evidence, not closing the door. But phrasing matters, especially to victims who’ve spent years repeating the same accounts to agencies that, in their view, keep moving the goalposts. Patel’s insistence that there’s nothing “credible” beyond Epstein himself landed like a slap, reigniting the core grievance of the saga: that institutions protected the powerful and failed the vulnerable.
Where this goes next could set the tone for the entire probe. Survivors want the FD-302s out, sworn interviews on the record, and a sit-down with the FBI chief. Lawmakers want receipts, not briefings. And the public, still processing the government’s July conclusion that there is no “client list” and that Epstein died by suicide, is demanding clarity after years of rumor and redactions. The credibility clock is ticking.
What a squirming piece of weasel shit!
Inquisitr: ICE Arrests Plummet in Embarrassing Setback for Stephen Miller
Despite pressure from White House policy strategist Stephen Miller to escalate migrant detentions, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recorded a 19 percent drop in daily arrests from June to July. This surprising downturn shows the limits of their aggressive immigration tactics.
According to the nonpartisan Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), ICE booked an average of 990 arrests per day between July 1 and July 27. That’s down markedly from 1,224 arrests per day during June, representing a nearly 20 percent decline in a single month.
These figures bring into stark relief the discrepancy between on-the-ground performance and Miller’s high-pressure expectations. The former White House deputy chief of staff has relentlessly pushed for 3,000 arrests per day, an unprecedented rate intended to realize former President Trump’s plans for the largest mass deportation effort in U.S. history. Instead, ICE is operating at roughly one-third the pace Miller demanded.
Miller, widely viewed as the architect behind many of Trump’s toughest immigration policies, allegedly threatened to fire ICE field office leaders whose offices ranked in the bottom 10 percent for arrest activity. Such aggressive oversight and internal pressure were intended to turbocharge enforcement, but the data shows the policy has not translated into scaled results.
The TRAC data signals potentially growing internal friction within ICE. Enforcement resources, legal constraints, staffing levels, and logistical complexities appear to be undermining Miller’s push for rapid, large-scale migrant arrests.
Whether administrative resistance, legal challenges, or operational capacity is at fault remains unclear, but the numbers do. A drop from 1,224 to 990 arrests per day means ICE detained roughly 7,758 fewer people in July than would have been expected under June’s pace, despite White House demands to ramp up enforcement.
Critics say the gap between Miller’s strategy and ICE’s actual output underscores a deeper disconnect within the immigration apparatus, between political directives from the top and the reality of enforcement on the ground. They argue this is a cautionary tale about over-reliance on high-intensity quotas that neglect operational feasibility and legal safeguards.
Supporters of Miller’s agenda argue that even the 990-per-day arrest rate in July signals a robust, no-exception enforcement posture, and the decline may reflect fewer available targets or improved border deterrence.
Still, the shortfall is stark. If ICE had met the 3,000-per-day benchmark for July, it would have booked around 90,000 arrests in the month. Instead, at its current pace, it would come in closer to 28,000 arrests total, missing the goal by a factor of more than three.
Even more, the drop comes at a critical time. As summer progresses and border crossings and migration patterns shift, policy advocates emphasize that maintaining, or increasing, enforcement momentum is crucial to sustaining broader deterrence goals.
From a political standpoint, the trend presents a public relations challenge for Miller. Suppose enforcement agencies cannot deliver on his demands. In that case, critics may question the realism of his approach to immigration control and the decision to push staff with threats instead of sustainable support.
Looking ahead, ICE may attempt to recalibrate, temporarily increasing internal operations or focusing on more enforceable cases. But any future uptick will face scrutiny: Is the agency capable of scaling to match Miller’s specified targets, or was the strategy always out of sync with practical limitations?
In sum, the nearly 20 percent drop in ICE arrests from June to July marks a humbling moment for immigration hardliners. Despite intense pressure from Miller to meet ambitious quotas, the agency’s output fell sharply and well below the aggressive benchmarks laid out by the former deputy chief of staff.
Inquisitr: ICE Arrests Plummet in Embarrassing Setback for Stephen Miller