Newsweek: US visa interviews to change from October: What to know

“…requiring interviews for children is patently absurd.”

What To Know

In a notice published on Thursday, the State Department outlined the changes to its visa waiver policy.

The waiver program, which was expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce in-person interviews, will now be limited to a narrow set of categories.

Those exempt from interviews include individuals applying for diplomatic or official visas, namely A-1, A-2, C-3, G-1 through G-4, NATO-1 through NATO-6, and TECRO E-1.

Certain visa renewals are also eligible for a waiver. These are full-validity B-1, B-2, or B1/B2 visas, H-2A visas and Border Crossing Cards for Mexican nationals, as long as the renewal takes place within 12 months of the prior visa’s expiration and the applicant was at least 18 when the previous visa was issued.

Even if applicants meet the waiver criteria, they could still require an in-person interview on a case-by-case basis, the State Department said.

The new rules come into effect as data published by the State Department in August showed that appointment wait times for visitor and tourist visas have soared.

Between January and August, wait times for visitor visas rose 69 percent, while interviews for student visas grew by more than 250 percent.

Cecilia Esterline, a senior immigration policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, previously told Newsweek that the new changes could create unforeseen complications, such as children being required to attend a visa interview when their parents are not.

“A parent could have a valid visitor visa, and they could come as a tourist themselves without having to go to a U.S. Consulate. They could even renew their tourist visa without having to visit a consulate in person,” she said.

“However, if they have a child who needs a new visa, including a few-week-old infant, that child would have to go to an interview, which is an absurd idea to think about the fact that a six-week-old would need to go to have an interview but a parent would not, but that’s the reality of it.”

What People Are Saying

A State Department spokesperson told Newsweek in August that the Trump administration was protecting the nation and its citizens “by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety.”

Houston-based immigration attorney Steven Brown wrote on X, formerly Twitter, in July: “This will lead to longer waits for appointments and is significantly less efficient for renewals of visas. Also requiring interviews for children is patently absurd.”

What Happens Next

The updated interview waiver guidance will take effect October 1.

Trumps racists are just trying to reduce the number of nonwhites in the U.S. by clogging the pipelines.

https://www.newsweek.com/us-visa-interviews-change-october-2132510

Scripps News: Immigrant detainees reported mistreatment at private jail before suicide [Video]

A Scripps News investigation found reports of suicide attempts and lack of medical care at a Pennsylvania detention center. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/immigrant-detainees-reported-mistreatment-at-private-jail-before-suicide/vi-AA1MPDk4

Axios: SF civil rights groups sue ICE over courthouse arrests and “inhumane” detention

San Francisco civil rights groups are suing the Trump administration over immigration officials’ courthouse arrest tactics and accusing them of detaining immigrants in “punitive and inhumane” conditions, steamrolling their rights to due process.

Why it matters: The lawsuit is one of the latest legal challenges to the policies of the Trump administration, which ended a Biden-era prohibition on civil immigration arrests in and around courthouses while tripling U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement’s (ICE) arrest quota.

Driving the news: The class action lawsuit alleges that federal officials are violating the law when they “lurk outside of courtrooms, violently ambush immigrants … and immediately whisk them away.”

  • Immigrants who expect a “neutral forum” to make their case must “either risk immediately and arbitrarily losing their freedom or lose their opportunity” to remain in the U.S., per the complaint.

Zoom in: Those detained at ICE’s San Francisco Field Office further endure days in “small, cold rooms, sometimes with hardly enough space to sit, let alone sleep,” the lawsuit alleges.

  • Some plaintiffs were “forced to sleep on metal benches or directly on the floor … with nothing more than a thin plastic or foil blanket or a thin mat,” per the suit.
  • They were kept for days without access to legal counsel, hygiene supplies or medical care, including prescriptions, and forced to urinate and defecate in front of each other, the complaint claims.

What they’re saying: “Converting required hearings into a trap in this manner undermines the public’s basic expectations of a fair day in court,” states the complaint, which was filed in the Northern District of California.

  • The plaintiffs are represented by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area and ACLU NorCal, among others.

The other side: The Trump administration did not immediately return a request for comment.

  • A senior Homeland Security spokesperson previously told Axios that ICE “is now following the law” and placing immigrants in expedited removal, “as they always should have been.”

Between the lines: ICE arrests in SF came to a head earlier this summer when federal agents were seen using pepper spray and pushing through a resisting protest crowd in an SUV carrying a detained immigrant.

  • The incident led to calls for the city to bolster protections against ICE and scrutiny over how local police interact with federal agents, who are often in masks or plainclothes.
  • ICE leadership says agents wear masks because of instances where they and their families were doxxed.

The big picture: ICE officers had arrested over 100 people in San Francisco as of Thursday, mostly at ICE’s downtown field office or the city’s immigration court, Mission Local reports.

What we’re watching: Attorneys for the plaintiffs have asked the court to bar ICE agents from continuing their tactics in San Francisco and immediately release their clients from custody.

https://www.axios.com/local/san-francisco/2025/09/19/ice-courthouse-arrests-civil-rights-lawsuit

Fox News: Over 300,000 children who crossed the border are missing [Video]

‘Border Czar’ Tom Homan joins ‘America Reports’ to discuss hundreds of thousands of children who have gone missing after crossing the border, the processes used to find them and the Trump administration’s handling of the border.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/over-300-000-children-who-crossed-the-border-are-missing/vi-AA1MPS0D


I seriously doubt that an evil ogre like Tom Homan gives a rat’s ass about a few (hundred thousand) missing immigrant children.

Alternet: Trump sold Americans a ‘fantasy’ — and it’s now unraveling

In the 2024 election, the fact that Donald Trump’s hardcore MAGA base aggressively supported him came as no surprise. But it was independents and swing voters who ultimately got Trump past the finish line and gave him a narrow victory in a close election.

Trump won the popular vote for the first time in 2024, defeating Democratic nominee Kamala Harris by roughly 1.5 percent — and the economy, according to polls, played a key role in that victory. Although the United States enjoyed record-low unemployment during Joe Biden’s presidency, frustration over inflation worked to Trump’s advantage.

But The New York Times’ Jamelle Bouie, in his September 17 column, argues that Trump sold U.S. voters a “fantasy” that is now unravelling.

Trump, according to Bouie, told 2024 voters that “that there were no trade-offs” with the economy — and that Americans “could have their cake and eat it, too” when, “in reality,” it “was a binary choice.”

“The essence of President Trump’s pitch to the American people last year was simple: They could have it both ways,” Bouie explains. “They could have a powerful, revitalized economy and ‘mass deportations now.’ They could build new factories and take manufacturing jobs back from foreign competitors as well as expel every person who, in their view, didn’t belong in the United States. They could live in a ‘golden age’ of plenty — and seal it away from others outside the country with a closed, hardened border.”

One “binary choice,” according to Bouie, was that “Americans could have a strong, growing economy, which requires immigration to bring in new people and fill demand for labor, or they could finance a deportation force and close the border to everyone but a small, select few.”

“Millions of Americans embraced the fantasy,” Bouie laments. “Now, about eight months into Trump’s second term, the reality of the situation is inescapable. As promised, Trump launched a campaign of mass deportation. Our cities are crawling with masked federal agents, snatching anyone who looks ‘illegal’ to them — a bit of racial profiling that has, for now, been sanctioned by the Supreme Court. The jobs, however, haven’t arrived.”

The New York Times columnist continues, “There are fewer manufacturing jobs than there were in 2024, thanks in part to the president’s tariffs and, well, his immigration policies…. To embrace nativism in a global, connected economic world is to sacrifice prosperity for the sake of exclusion, just as the main effect of racial segregation in the American South was to leave the region impoverished and underdeveloped.”

https://www.alternet.org/trump-economy-bouie

Guardian: California nurses decry Ice presence at hospitals: ‘Interfering with patient care’

Caregiving staff say agents are bringing in patients, often denying them visitors and speaking on their behalf to staff

Dianne Sposito, a 69-year-old nurse, is laser-focused on providing care to anyone who enters the UCLA emergency room in southern California, where she works.

That task was made difficult though one week in June, she said, when a federal immigration agent blocked her from treating an immigrant who was screaming just a few feet in front of her in the hospital.

Sposito, a nurse with more than 40 years of experience, said her hospital is among many that have faced hostile encounters with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agents amid the Trump administration’s escalating immigration crackdown.

The nurse said that the Ice agent – wearing a mask, sunglasses and hat without any clear identification – brought a woman already in custody to the hospital. The patient was screaming and trying to get off the gurney, and when Sposito tried to assess her, the agent blocked her and told her not to touch the patient.

“I’ve worked with police officers for years, and I’ve never seen anything like this,” Sposito said. “It was very frightful because the person behind him is screaming, yelling, and I don’t know what’s going on with her.”

The man confirmed he was an Ice agent, and when Sposito asked for his name, badge, and warrant, he refused to give her his identification and insisted he didn’t need a warrant. The situation escalated until the charge nurse called hospital administration, who stepped in to handle it.

“They’re interfering with patient care,” Sposito said.

After the incident, Sposito said that hospital administration held a meeting and clarified that Ice agents are only allowed in public areas, not ER rooms and that staff should call hospital administration immediately if agents are present.

But for Sposito, the guidelines fall short, as the hostility is unlike anything she has seen in over two decades as a nurse, she said..

“[The agent] would not show me anything. You don’t know who these people are. I found it extremely harrowing, and the fact that they were blocking me from a patient – that patient could be dying.”

Since the Trump administration has stepped up its arrest of immigrants at the start of the summer, nurses are seeing an increase in Ice presence at hospitals, with agents bringing in patients to facilities, said Mary Turner, president of National Nurses United, the largest organization of registered nurses in the country.

“The presence of Ice agents is very disruptive and creates an unsafe and fearful environment for patients, nurses and other staff,” Turner said. “Immigrants are our patients and our colleagues.”

While there’s no national data tracking Ice activity in hospitals, several regional unions have said they’ve seen an increase.

“We’ve heard from members recently about Ice agents or Ice contractors being inside hospitals, which never occurred prior to this year,” said Sal Rosselli, president emeritus of the National Union of Healthcare Workers.

Turner said nurses have reported that agents sometimes prevent patients from contacting family or friends and that Ice agents have listened in on conversations between patients and healthcare workers, actions that violate HIPAA, the federal law protecting patient privacy.

In addition, Turner said, nurses have reported concerns that patients taken away by Ice will not receive the care they need. “Hospitals are supposed to discharge a patient with instructions for the patient and/or whoever will be caring for them as they convalesce,” Turner said.

The increased presence of immigration agents at hospitals comes after Donald Trump issued an executive order overturning the long-standing status of hospitals, healthcare facilities and schools as “sensitive locations”, where immigration enforcement was limited.

Nurses, in California and other states across the nation, said they fear the new policy, in addition to deterring care at medical facilities, will deter sick people from seeking care when they need it.

“Allowing Ice undue access to hospitals, clinics, nursing homes and other healthcare institutions is both deeply immoral and contrary to public health,” said George Gresham, president of the 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, and Patricia Kane, the executive director of the New York State Nurses Association in a statement. “We must never be put into positions where we are expected to assist, or be disrupted by, federal agents as they sweep into our institutions and attempt to detain patients or their loved ones.”

Policies on immigration enforcement vary across healthcare facilities. In California, county-run public healthcare systems are required to adopt the policies laid out by the state’s attorney general, which limit information sharing with immigration authorities, require facilities to inform patients of their rights and set protocols for staff to register, document and report immigration officers’ visits. However, other healthcare entities are only encouraged to do so. Each facility develops its own policies based on relevant state or federal laws and regulations.

Among the most high-profile cases of Ice presence in hospitals in California occurred outside of Los Angeles in July. Ming Tanigawa-Lau, a staff attorney at the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, represents Milagro Solis Portillo, a 36-year-old Salvadorian woman who was detained by Ice outside her home in Sherman Oaks and hospitalized that same day at Glendale Memorial, where detention officers kept watch in the lobby around the clock.

Solis Portillo was then forcibly removed from Glendale Memorial against her doctor’s orders and transferred to Anaheim Global Medical center, another regional hospital, according to her lawyer. Once there, Ice agents barred her from receiving visitors, denied her access to family and her attorney, prevented private conversations with doctors and interrupted a monitored phone call with Tanigawa-Lau.

“I repeatedly asked Ice to tell me which law or which policy they were referring to that allowed them to deny visits, and especially access to her attorney, and they never responded to me,” Tanigawa-Lau said.

Ice officers sat by Solis Portillo’s bed and often spoke directly to medical staff on her behalf, according to Tanigawa-Lau. This level of surveillance violated both patient confidentiality and detainee rights, interfering with her care and traumatizing her, Tanigawa-Lau said.

Since then, Solis Portillo was moved between facilities, from the Los Angeles processing center to a federal prison and eventually out of state to a jail in Clark county, Indiana.

In a statement, Glendale Memorial said “the hospital cannot legally restrict law enforcement or security personnel from being present in public areas which include the hospital lobby/waiting area”.

“Ice does not conduct enforcement operations at hospitals nor interfere with medical care of any illegal alien,” said DHS assistant secretary, Tricia McLaughlin. “It is a longstanding practice to provide comprehensive medical care from the moment an alien enters Ice custody. This includes access to medical appointments and 24-hour emergency care.”

The federal government has aggressively responded to healthcare workers challenging the presence of immigration agents at medical facilities. In August the US Department of Justice charged two staff members at the Ontario Advanced Surgical center in San Bernardino county in California, accusing them of assaulting federal agents.

The charges stem from events on 8 July, when Ice agents chased three men at the facility. One of the men, an immigrant from Honduras, fled on foot to evade law enforcement and was briefly captured in the center’s parking lot, and then he broke free and ran inside, according to the indictment. There, the government said, two employees at the center, tried to protect the man and remove federal agents from the building.

“The staff attempted to obstruct the arrest by locking the door, blocking law enforcement vehicles from moving, and even called the cops claiming there was a ‘kidnapping’,” said McLaughlin. The Department of Justice referred questions about the case to DHS.

The immigrant was eventually taken into custody, and the health care workers, Jesus Ortega and Danielle Nadine Davila were charged with “assaulting and interfering with United States immigration officers attempting to lawfully detain” an immigrant.

Oliver Cleary, who represents Davila, said a video shows that Ice’s claim that Davila assaulted the agent is false.

“They’re saying that because she placed her body in between them, that that qualifies as a strike,” Cleary said. “The case law clearly requires it to be a physical force strike, and that you can tell that didn’t happen.”

The trial is slated to start on 6 October.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/16/california-ice-hospitals-patient-care

Money Talks News: “There’s No Way This Is Going to Happen to Us” : Army Sergeant, Before ICE Deports His Wife

Immigration enforcement actions are separating military families despite ongoing legal processes for citizenship. The War Horse investigation reveals how thousands of service members face difficult choices between military service and family unity.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/there-s-no-way-this-is-going-to-happen-to-us-army-sergeant-before-ice-deports-his-wife/vi-AA1Mzq2j

Washington Post: A D.C. neighborhood long home to immigrants pushes back against ICE arrests

The text messages ricocheted across Mount Pleasant, a historically diverse enclave two miles north of the White House, moments after someone said they saw federal agents stopping a Latino immigrant driving his daughter to school.

“At a raid now at mt p and Lamont!!!” popped up on Phaedra Siebert’s phone a few blocks from the intersection, she recalled later. Sprinting over, the former museum curator joined a crowd that was screaming at officers they assumed were with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“Shame on you!” they chanted. “Shame on you!”

“We’ve got ICE out here!” someone yelled. “ICE here!”

President Donald Trump’s crackdown on crime in D.C. roiled large swaths of the nation’s capital, as Washingtonians encountered police checkpoints, armed National Guard troops and masked immigration agents. Although the president’s 30-day emergency ended Wednesday, the heightened pace of immigration arrests has continued in the city.

In Mount Pleasant, a left-leaning neighborhood whose large Latino population has long been part of the community’s fabric, residents have responded out of a sense of kinship to the sight of ICE agents swooping in, presumably to apprehend people living and working there suspected of being in the country illegally.

On weekday mornings, those upset by the arrests volunteer to chaperone groups of children walking to schools. Others patrol the streets, some while walking their dogs and riding bikes. Everyone is on the lookout for agents in unmarked SUV’s with tinted windows and out of state license plates that are hard to miss against a backdrop of elegant brick rowhouses and apartment buildings and a colorful low-rise commercial corridor.

If something catches their attention, they blow homemade whistles — their high-pitched trill echoing through the streets — and text warnings to hundreds of neighbors, many of them on a messaging system the man behind it likened to a “bat signal.”

“Can we stop ICE from coming? No,” said Rick Reinhard, who has lived in Mount Pleasant for more than 50 years and helped launch the network, among several residents use to communicate. “But can we make it uncomfortable? … Yeah.”

Mount Pleasant residents have their reasons for focusing their concern on ICE. In the month since the start of Trump’s crackdown, according to White House officials, law enforcement has apprehended slightly more than 1,000 immigrants across D.C., accounting for about 38 percent of the arrests they have reported for the period.

Following Trump’s emergency declaration on Aug. 11, Attorney General Pam Bondi said D.C.’s lenient policies toward immigrants, which prohibited police from cooperating in ICE arrests, made the city more dangerous. Immigration agents intensified enforcement in areas such as Columbia Heights and Mount Pleasant, neighborhoods popular among the city’s 95,000 immigrants, more than a quarter of them estimated to be undocumented.

Siebert, 54, was on her own self-styled walking patrol Aug. 28 just before 8 a.m. when she saw the text about agents detaining the man at the corner of Mount Pleasant and Lamont streets.

As she arrived, she said, she saw that the officers already had the man in handcuffs and that his daughter was weeping. Loren Galesi, who also lives in the neighborhood, had positioned herself in front of what she thought was an agent’s car, an act of protest she later described as “so out of character for me.”

“In a political city, we’re not political,” Galesi, 42, a graduate student in history at Georgetown University, said of herself and her husband, who moved to Mount Pleasant with their two children in 2021. “I vote every four years, that’s the extent to my involvement.”

Something changed in her after the start of Trump’s crackdown, said Galesi, as she witnessed “these masked agents show up and take our neighbors away.”

At the intersection that morning, Galesi saw the agents place the man in a car and drive off. Her friend, Liz Sokolov, 50, an educator who had been on her own patrol when she came upon the crowd, was in tears. “It just feels like you’re living in a country you don’t recognize,” Sokolov said later.

She tried to comfort herself with the thought that the detained man “knew we didn’t want him taken away and knew we were using our voices to help.” Yet, a litany of unsettling questions remained, not the least of which was when the agents would return.

Everyone is scared

The ICE raids — and the possibility of more in the future — has caused fear in the neighborhood, a sloping pocket just off 16th Street NW with a diverse population of lawyers, policy analysts, Capitol Hill staffers, and blue collar workers, many of them immigrants from El Salvador.

The neighborhood has faced a variety of crises over the years, including a 1991 riot that began when a police officer shot a Salvadoran immigrant. A five alarm fire in an apartment building in 2008 displaced 200 low income Latino families. The pandemic delivered another wave of pain five years ago.

Six days after Trump’s Aug. 11 emergency declaration, the administration made it known that Mount Pleasant was on its radar. On social media, ICE posted a video of agents descending on a neighborhood plaza and ripping down a banner that used a Spanish epithet to denigrate the agency.

“We’re taking America back, baby,” an agent says in the video, his face concealed by sunglasses, a hat, and a black gaiter.

Residents replaced the banner with another — “No Deportations in Mt. Pleasant,” it read — though their defiance did not salve the general unease.

“People are really, really scared; they don’t want to go to their jobs, they don’t want to go shopping,” said Yasmin Romero-Castillo, head of a local tenants association who buys groceries for residents too afraid to leave their apartments.

As she spoke, she sipped tea at Dos Gringos, a cafe whose owner, Alex Kramer, has been a Mount Pleasant fixture since 1994. Kramer said her business suffered during the crime emergency because employees from nearby shops weren’t going to work and dropping in for coffee. “The neighborhood is dead; they have killed the vibe,” Kramer said. “You listen for the whistles and the helicopters. Everyone is scared. I’m scared.”

The shrill of a whistle and a woman shouting, “Get your hands off of her!” is what caught Claudia Schlosberg’s attention on Labor Day as she watered her garden.

Schlosberg, 71, a civil rights and health care attorney who has lived in Mount Pleasant since 1978, dropped her hose and ran to the corner where U.S. Park Police officers and other agents were questioning the driver of a van and her passenger.

The officers, Schlosberg said, smashed the window, pulled the passenger out and whisked him away. A woman who questioned the arrest had been pulled off her bicycle and over to the sidewalk by a man in a vest marked “Police.” As she tried to video, Schlosberg said the same man threatened her with pepper spray and ordered her to move back.

“What are you doing?” Schlossberg recalled responding. “Why are you doing this? Get out of here!”

Two days later, Schlosberg was part of a group of 50 residents who went to a local library, expecting to voice their concerns over the immigration arrests at a meeting with someone from the office of D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D).

Many in the neighborhood were already displeased that Bowser had signed an executive order directing her police force to coordinate with federal authorities indefinitely, though the mandate did not include ICE.

They never got to share those sentiments. Anthony Robertson, a Bowser staffer, showed up only to depart quickly without taking questions. “It really feels like there’s no one we can turn to protect our community,” Schlosberg said.

A mayoral spokesperson, in a statement, did not directly address the reason for Robertson’s departure but said the administration would “continue to work with the community” through “the appropriate senior officials who can provide the most relevant and timely information.”

The ‘eyes and ears’ of the community

Even before Trump took office in January, Reinhard contemplated ways to organize Mount Pleasant, figuring that the neighborhood’s immigrant population could be vulnerable if the president carried out a campaign threat to takeover the city.

By the spring, Reinhard, a photographer with a history of activism in the neighborhood, had started a texting network and recruited a few people. Then came Trump’s emergency declaration and membership on the channel ticked up: 50 people, then 80, then 100, then 200 and more.

Recruits are vetted to ensure they don’t work for the Trump administration, as well as law enforcement and news organizations, and are encouraged not to talk to outsiders about the channel. “There’s so much concern that they could seize our phones and infiltrate a group chat,” Galesi said. “There’s a strong sense that if you don’t live here, we can’t trust you.”

One neighborhood restaurant owner described the messaging system as the “eyes and ears” of Mount Pleasant. “As soon as someone posts they’ve seen something, someone will be like, ‘I’ll be there in five minutes,’” said the owner, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, fearful of drawing unwelcome attention to the restaurant. “It’s almost like a constant patrol. Instead of walkie-talkies, they’re using their phones.”

Others started their own chat groups, including Sokolov, who worried that a local day care center could be vulnerable because it caters to immigrants families. A friend with a 3D printer volunteered to make nearly 200 whistles they distributed across Mount Pleasant.

Siebert started her patrols weekday mornings, beginning at 6:45 a.m. She has become adept, she said, at spotting unmarked police SUVs, “usually black or charcoal,” with their darkened windows and concealed emergency lights.

“I’m glad to be doing something of use when it’s easy to feel entirely impotent,” she said. “I’m also glad to find a way to use my privilege as a nice White lady. People don’t clock me as a someone patrolling the patrollers but this is what we do. One of my tools is blonde hair.”

By the end of the first week of September, the visits from federal agents seemed to subside. Residents remained on alert, though. Their messaging systems still hummed. Patrols persisted.

As parents picked up children at the Bancroft Elementary School one afternoon, a man pointed down the street as he walked his Chihuahua and shouted, “Hey everybody! Be careful! ICE is out there!”

Heads turned, footsteps quickened.

“They’re down the street!” the man repeated. “They’re down there!”

At the end of the block, there was no sign of ICE or any other law enforcement, for that matter. “A UPS man said he’d seen them outside an alley,” the man explained. “And in another alley.”

He shrugged and moved on.

A few feet away, a boy turned to a stranger.

“What’s ICE?” he asked, his brow furrowed before he resumed his walk home.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-d-c-neighborhood-long-home-to-immigrants-pushes-back-against-ice-arrests/ar-AA1MIU0Q

Regtechtimes: U.S. veteran detained by immigration officers in California over identity despite valid ID

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in his opinion, wrote that citizens or lawful residents would be free to go after brief encounters with immigration agents.

But this veteran’s experience shows the opposite. The officers didn’t check his documents when it would have taken only two minutes. Instead, they arrested him based on where he worked and his appearance.

On July 10, a 25-year-old U.S. citizen and Army veteran was on his way to work as a security guard at a cannabis farm in Camarillo, Ventura County, California. He never expected that his day would take a drastic turn. As he approached the farm, he noticed traffic piling up with cars stuck bumper-to-bumper. Protesters were walking along the sides of the street. He soon saw masked federal immigration agents blocking the road.

A terrifying encounter with immigration officers

He tried to explain that he was a U.S. citizen, a father of two, and an Army veteran who had served in Iraq. But the immigration agents didn’t seem to care. Their focus wasn’t on his identity or service record but on blocking his way.

As a contract worker, missing his job meant losing his paycheck. He got out of his car and tried to explain again. The immigration officers ignored him. When they started walking toward him, he got back inside his car to avoid confrontation.

The situation worsened when immigration agents began using tear gas to disperse the nearby protesters. The gas filled his car, making it difficult to breathe. He panicked but still tried to comply with the officers’ orders. However, they gave contradictory instructions like “pull over to the side” and “reverse” while also trying to open his car door.

Before he could react, an immigration agent smashed his window and sprayed pepper spray into the car. He was dragged out, and one agent knelt on his neck while another pinned his back. Despite holding valid identification in his wallet inside the car, the officers refused to check and confirm his citizenship.

He was zip-tied and made to sit in the dirt with other detainees for four hours. He overheard immigration agents questioning why he had been arrested but received no answers. After that, he was thrown into a jail cell without charges or explanations.

Inhumane Conditions in Immigration Detention

His first night in jail was unbearable. His hands, coated with tear gas and pepper spray, burned constantly because he wasn’t allowed to wash them off. Over the next three nights and days, he remained locked up without being allowed to make a phone call or speak to a lawyer.

He missed his daughter’s third birthday. Still, no explanation or apology was offered. After three days, he was released with no charges against him. He was simply let go, with immigration officials providing only a vague statement about cases being reviewed for “potential federal charges.”

This ordeal shook him deeply. He served his country wearing the military uniform, standing watch in dangerous conditions abroad. He believed in the values of fairness, respect, and dignity that are supposed to be guaranteed to every citizen in America.

However, despite proving his citizenship and military service, he was stripped of his rights. He was treated like an intruder, forcibly detained and isolated without cause.

The Broader Warning: This Could Happen to Anyone

The Supreme Court recently allowed immigration enforcement officers to continue their aggressive tactics in California. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in his opinion, wrote that citizens or lawful residents would be free to go after brief encounters with immigration agents.

But this veteran’s experience shows the opposite. The officers didn’t check his documents when it would have taken only two minutes. Instead, they arrested him based on where he worked and his appearance.

This is not an issue about political sides or voting patterns. It’s about basic rights. If a U.S. citizen can be detained by immigration agents, silenced, and dehumanized despite holding valid identification, then anyone could be next.

This veteran’s experience has now become a warning signal. He is taking legal action with the help of the Institute for Justice under the Federal Torts Claim Act. However, he must wait six months before filing a lawsuit.

He stresses that justice should not be restricted to one group or one viewpoint—it must be accessible and fair for all.

His case highlights how immigration enforcement policies, without proper checks, can strip citizens of their dignity and rights. It raises important questions about oversight, accountability, and fairness in immigration enforcement.

This is not just one person’s story—it’s a cautionary tale that underscores the importance of protecting every citizen from wrongful treatment by immigration authorities.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/u-s-veteran-detained-by-immigration-officers-in-california-over-identity-despite-valid-id/ar-AA1MJg0z

HuffPost: Federal Agents Retreat From Immigration Raid In Upstate New York Amid Protests: ‘Gestapo’

The operation took one man into custody, according to local outlet WXXI.

Federal agents pulled back from a raid on rooftop workers at a rental site in upstate New York on Tuesday morning, as protesters crowded the street outside the location and forcefully condemned their operation.

About 100 demonstrators joined the scene in Rochester, yelling “shame” and “Gestapo,” as immigration enforcement agents, some of which were masked, tried to arrest people working at the site, eventually forcing them to retreat, according to WXXI. The protesters clapped and made obscene gestures as the agents left, the local outlet said.

One vehicle belonging to U.S. Customs and Border Protection was left with four flat tires. It’s unclear how the tires were slashed. Protesters cheered as that SUV was driven away.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, acknowledged that slashing the tires of a federal agent’s vehicle could amount to serious wrongdoing.

“Which is why it’s pretty incredible that we are seeing that level of willingness to engage in pretty serious behavior in opposition to immigration enforcement,” Reichlin-Melnick wrote on X, formerly Twitter.

One of the people who was doing work on the roof was taken into custody as a result of Tuesday’s operation, WXXI said. Roofing contractor Clayton Baker identified the man as one of his workers, noting that he had legal documentation, and decried his arrest as “inhumane.”

“He’s a family guy, and he’s got a baby on the way. He’s never even had a speeding ticket that I know of. He goes to church every Sunday, and he pays his taxes,” Baker told WXXI.

The agents did not manage to detain any of the other workers, who remained on the roof throughout the operation.

A CBP spokesperson said Tuesday’s raid was a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation. ICE did not immediately return HuffPost’s request for comment.

Ruth Reeves, one of the people who joined the protest, told WHAM why she felt compelled to show up.

“They’re here putting on a roof, trying to make a dollar and paying taxes on that dollar, and ICE was here bothering them, so I came to bother ICE,” Reeves told the outlet.

As the White House has intensified its immigration crackdown across the country, the Trump administration earlier this year sued Rochester over its “sanctuary city” policies. The city council has since voted to reaffirm that policy.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/federal-agents-retreat-immigration-raid_n_68c1486de4b0f2df4e0512d5