Raw Story: Mike Johnson busted over latest excuse for not swearing in Dem lawmaker

CNBC host Andrew Ross Sorkin called out House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) after he delayed swearing in Arizona Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D).

During a Thursday interview, CNBC host Joe Kernen noted that Johnson refused to seat the lawmaker after she said she would be the final vote needed to force the release of files on sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

“Okay, this is so absurd, and I’ve answered it so many times, but I’ll do it again,” Johnson complained. “I’m following the Pelosi precedent. She was speaker here a long time. She did this many times.”

According to the speaker, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) took 25 days to swear in Rep. Julia Letlow (R-VA) after her special election.

In a lawsuit filed this week, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (D) noted that Pelosi had sworn in Letlow at a time of her choosing.

“[T]hen-Speaker Pelosi communicated with Dr. Letlow immediately after the election, and the swearing in was scheduled at a time convenient for all parties,” the lawsuit stated. “Ms. Grijalva would be delighted if Speaker Johnson would contact her to commit to a mutually agreeable time, as Speaker Pelosi did for Dr. Letlow.”

https://www.rawstory.com/mike-johnson-andrew-ross-sorkin

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/mike-johnson-busted-over-latest-excuse-for-not-swearing-in-dem-lawmaker/ar-AA1P3pP0


Mike Johnson lies almost as much as King Donald.

Newsweek: Donald Trump says Republican must be thrown out of Congress ‘ASAP’

President Donald Trump lashed out at Representative Thomas Massie on Friday, calling for his immediate removal from Congress in a fiery post on Truth Social.

“Third Rate Congressman Thomas Massie, a Weak and Pathetic RINO from the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky, a place I love, and won big SIX TIMES, must be thrown out of office, ASAP!” Trump wrote.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-says-republican-must-be-thrown-out-of-congress-asap-10899757

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-says-republican-must-be-thrown-out-of-congress-asap/ar-AA1OIJly

Politico: Trump teen rape accuser abruptly calls off news conference

A woman who has filed federal lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago, when she was 13, abruptly canceled a news conference Wednesday at which she was to detail her extraordinary claims against the GOP presidential nominee.

In the most recent suit, Trump’s accuser asserts that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/donald-trump-rape-accuser-lawsuits-230647

National Circus: Epstein Survivors Speak Loud and Clear: ‘We Know Their Names’

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse are taking a bold and unprecedented step. Frustrated by the Justice Department’s repeated denials of any “client list” implicating powerful individuals in Epstein’s criminal network, a group of survivors — including relatives of the late Virginia Giuffre — reportedly announced plans to compile and release their own unofficial list of alleged associates. This survivor-led initiative, unveiled in Washington, D.C., signals a chilling disregard for transparency by institutions and an unexpected path to justice driven by those who endured the trauma firsthand.

A Survivor-Driven Reckoning

At a packed news conference on Capitol Hill, survivors shared gut-wrenching stories of abuse and exploitation, underscoring the urgency behind their demand for full disclosure. Lisa Phillips, one of Epstein’s accusers, revealed that survivors have been quietly compiling names of individuals they say were regularly involved in Epstein’s world. According to CBS News, she emphasized that this list is being created “by survivors and for survivors,” with no outside parties involved. The group is reportedly turning to documents such as flight logs, emails, and other records to piece together the network that they believe the Justice Department has failed to fully expose.

Phillips acknowledged the fear that surrounds releasing such a list, noting that many survivors are too scared to come forward publicly. The group’s decision to take matters into their own hands reflects a deep mistrust of official channels and a determination to hold those they believe responsible accountable, regardless of institutional roadblocks.

The Justice Department’s Denial and Institutional Stonewalling

The Justice Department and FBI have repeatedly stated that no client list exists in the files related to Epstein’s case. This official stance has fueled frustration and skepticism among survivors and their advocates. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s earlier comments about reviewing files on her desk added to the confusion, as subsequent clarifications suggested she was referring to the broader collection of documents rather than a specific list of clients.

Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican leading the charge alongside Democrat Ro Khanna, has reportedly filed a discharge petition to force a House vote on legislation compelling the Justice Department to release all Epstein files. While the House Oversight Committee has released tens of thousands of pages, critics argue that the Justice Department is curating the information, withholding key details that survivors believe are crucial to understanding the full scope of Epstein’s network, as reported by CBS News.

Fear and the Chilling Effect on Survivors

The survivors’ fear is palpable. Anouska De Georgiou, a British victim, described being threatened and followed, even while performing everyday tasks like driving her daughter to school. She and others spoke of the “profound cost” to their mental health and the ongoing trauma inflicted by Epstein and his associates, as reported by BBC. The survivors’ reluctance to release names publicly stems from concerns about retaliation, lawsuits, and further victimization. They pointed to past instances where survivors who named names faced harassment and legal battles, with little protection from the system.

This fear extends to the treatment of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator, who survivors say was transferred to a lower-security prison described as a “holiday camp,” according to BBC. The prospect of her receiving a pardon is a nightmare for many survivors, highlighting the ongoing struggle for justice and accountability.

The Path to Justice: An Unexpected Survivor Initiative

Despite the institutional stonewalling and the risks involved, survivors are forging a new path. Haley Robson, who alleges she was forced to recruit other teenage girls for Epstein, called for transparency and the unsealing of all documents. She described the release of files as a “huge component of healing,” according to CBS News, and urged lawmakers to “lift the curtain” on the truth. Robson, a registered Republican, challenged President Trump’s dismissal of calls for further disclosure as a “Democrat hoax,” pleading for survivors to be humanized and heard.

The survivors’ initiative to compile their own list is a powerful act of agency. It signals a refusal to be silenced or sidelined by political maneuvering. According to BBC, Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican congresswoman who has signed the discharge petition, pledged to read the list aloud on the House floor if given access, using her congressional immunity to protect herself from legal repercussions. This unexpected alliance between survivors and some members of Congress underscores the bipartisan demand for accountability.

The Political Backdrop

The Epstein files have become a political flashpoint. President Trump dismissed calls for further disclosure as a “Democrat hoax” aimed at distracting from his administration’s successes. He insisted that thousands of pages had already been released and that the focus should shift to his achievements. “Nobody is ever satisfied,” Trump remarked, as reported by BBC. “They’re trying to get people to talk about something that’s totally irrelevant to the success that we’ve had since I’ve been president … I think it’s enough.” This stance has been met with outrage from survivors and some lawmakers who see it as a dismissal of their trauma and a barrier to justice.

Meanwhile, Republican leaders have reportedly discouraged members from signing the discharge petition, fearing political fallout. Yet, a handful of Republicans have broken ranks, signaling a growing willingness to challenge the status quo. The House Oversight Committee continues its investigation, but many survivors and advocates argue that only full transparency will bring true justice.

What Lies Ahead?

The survivors’ plan to publish their own list of alleged Epstein associates is a dramatic escalation in the fight for transparency. It raises complex questions about privacy, legal risks, and the pursuit of justice outside traditional channels. The Justice Department’s denial of a client list contrasts sharply with the survivors’ conviction that such a list exists and must be made public.

As Congress inches closer to a vote on the discharge petition, and survivors prepare to release their own list, the Epstein saga remains a potent symbol of the struggle between secrecy and truth, power and justice.

https://nationalcircus.com/article/epstein-survivors-speak-loud-and-clear-we-know-their-names


So let’s hear them! Especially the ones that start with D-o-n!

Guardian: Why is the US House speaker refusing to seat an elected Democrat?

Adelita Grijalva won a landslide election for her Arizona seat. But Mike Johnson is defying the will of the voters

The people of Arizona’s seventh congressional district – a vast territory extending across the state’s south, along the Mexican border – have been denied representation in Congress for weeks. That’s because Mike Johnson, the Republican House speaker, has refused to swear in Adelita Grijalva, their representative-elect, who won a special election to fill the seat vacated by her father, the late Raúl Grijalva, in a landslide late last month. Grijalva, a Democrat, has been largely ignored by the speaker. Unlike sworn representatives, she has to go around the Capitol with an escort. There’s an office with her name on the door, but she hasn’t been allowed inside, and has worked instead out of a conference room on another floor.

It is an unprecedented abuse of procedural power on the part of the speaker, one that has had the effect of silencing a political opponent and denying representation to the citizens of her district. In refusing to seat Grijalva, Johnson has defied the will of Arizona’s voters, and effectively nullified, at least for the time being, a legitimate congressional election. He has persisted in this even in defiance of his own promises, after saying on Friday he would seat her this week once the House returned to session – and then telling lawmakers they wouldn’t reconvene this week after all. Last week, Grijalva showed up to a three-and-a-half-minute pro forma session, hoping to be sworn in then. (Johnson has sworn in other representatives at pro forma sessions in the past.) But the Republican presiding over the session, Morgan Griffith, ignored the effort. On a weekend talkshow, Grijalva said she had heard “absolutely nothing” from the speaker about the timing of her swearing in.

Grijalva thinks she knows why. There is no political calculation that could justify Mike Johnson’s refusal to seat a duly elected member of the House: Grijalva won her race, and both his oath to the constitution and his responsibilities to the body that he leads require Johnson to seat her. But in lieu of deference to these higher aims, Grijalva suspects that Johnson is pursuing a much more cynical one: in refusing to swear her in and allow her to take up the office to which she has been elected, Johnson, Grijalva thinks, is aiming to stop her becoming the final member of Congress whose signature is needed to force a vote on the release of confidential files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Currently, the petition has 217 signatures; it needs only 218. Grijalva has pledged to support it. “Why the rules are different for me – the only thing that I can think of is the Epstein files,” Grijalva told the New York Times.

The Epstein scandal, and the ensuing fallout from new and resurfaced revelations about Donald Trump’s deep and longstanding friendship with the deceased child sex trafficker and financier, has long plagued the Trump administration. One of the few genuine threats to Trump’s grip over his coalition came a few months ago, when his justice department refused to release files relating to the case, causing outrage among a group of rightwing podcasters, media personalities and conspiracy theorists who had long traded on speculation about the case and accusations that powerful Democrats were involved in a cover-up.

The discharge petition, if passed, would not be likely to result in the actual release of the documents. The move has little support in the Republican-backed Senate; there is no chance that Donald Trump, who has opposed the release of the Epstein files, calling them a “waste” of “time and energy”, would sign a bill into law making them public. But what the move would accomplish is forcing a full chamber vote on the matter, requiring every member of the Republican caucus to go on the record either endorsing the release of the files – and thereby displeasing Trump – or opposing it – thereby displeasing their voters. The Times has reported that Johnson’s delay is giving the White House more time to pressure Republicans who have already signed on to the discharge petition to remove their signatures before the Grijalva is sworn in.

And so it seems that Johnson is ignoring the constitution and subverting the will of the voters in order to buy time, in an effort to spare his party embarrassment over their president’s one-time close confidence with a pedophile.

But the refusal to seat Grijalva has broader implications. In using his procedural control over the functioning of Congress to deny a seat to an elected Democrat, Johnson is setting a dangerous precedent and raising questions about future transfers of power. If a Democratic majority is elected in 2026, will the outgoing Republican speaker duly swear in its members? Or will he use his procedural powers to delay one, several or many of them from taking their oaths of office – either under the pretext of election fraud or personal ineligibility, or out of sheer, bald unwillingness to hand over power to members of a party that the president and his allies have repeatedly described as illegitimate?

These are no longer fanciful questions; they are ones that must be asked. The Republicans who refused to subvert the law for Trump’s benefit on January 6 are now largely gone; the ones who have replaced them appear much more willing to place party before country. Every day that Grijalva is not sworn in, the shadow they cast over 2026 darkens.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/oct/09/why-is-the-us-house-speaker-refusing-to-seat-an-elected-democrat

USA Today: ‘Keep your mouth shut.’ Tempers flare in the Capitol with no shutdown solution in sight

The House minority leader yelled at a Republican congressman to “keep (his) mouth shut.” And that’s just the start of it.

Two weeks into a government shutdown with no end in sight, tensions are high and getting hotter among the people with the power to the end it.

At the U.S. Capitol this week, two Democratic senators confronted the Republican speaker of the House outside his office, accusing him of “covering up for pedophiles” by avoiding a vote to release more information on the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

On the same day, the Democratic House minority leader separately yelled at a Republican congressman to “keep your mouth shut.” And that’s just the start of it.

The testy scenes underscore an increasingly bitter rapport between America’s two major political parties, as the first government shutdown in seven years approaches the start of a third week. Lawmakers were making little effort to resolve their differences in public. The House of Representatives has not taken a vote in more than three weeks and the Senate has yet to work through a weekend since funding lapsed at the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30.

At the same time, the stakes of the shutdown are rising. On Wednesday, Oct. 15, military service members will miss their first paycheck since the shutdown crisis began. Funding for a key food aid program relied on by millions of mothers and infants will likely run out of money in the coming days. And key economic data needed to calculate Social Security payments for more than 70 million Americans next year doesn’t seem to be coming anytime soon.

Members of Congress say they are starting to feel the pressure. “I’m trying to muster every ounce of Christian charity that I can,” Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said of dealing with the Democrats.

“It’s bare knuckles in this fight,” added Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-California.

Senators confront speaker

On Wednesday, Oct. 8, two Democratic senators from Arizona were complaining about Johnson outside his office.

That’s when the speaker emerged and walked toward the senators, Ruben Gallego and Mark Kelly, who then criticized him over refusing to swear in a new Democratic congresswoman from their state during the shutdown.

Once Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva officially takes office, they pointed out, she’ll likely deliver the final vote needed to pass a measure forcing the Justice Department to publicly release more Epstein files.

The senators accused Johnson of keeping members of the House of Representatives away from the Capitol in order to delay the Epstein vote.

“We’re going to do that as soon as we get back to work. But we need the lights turned back on,” Johnson told them, according to video from the news outlet NOTUS. “You guys are experts in red herrings … This has nothing to do with Epstein.”

“You just keep coming up with excuses,” Gallego fired back.

The fiery exchange drew the attention of security guards, staffers and reporters, many of whom stood nearby, phones drawn, watching intently. It ended with all three politicians talking over each at the same time. Video of the encounter spread online.

Johnson drew even more heat when he took calls on C-SPAN the next morning. A rotation of frustrated Americans criticized him for failing to negotiate a solution to the shutdown. One caller in particular, a woman who said she was a military wife in northern Virginia who lives paycheck-to-paycheck, told the speaker of the House that her “kids could die” if troops go without pay.

Top Democrat to congressman: ‘Keep your mouth shut’

In another acrimonious scene the same day, a conversation between a Republican congressman and the leader of House Democrats devolved into a shouting match.

Rep. Mike Lawler, R-New York, confronted House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, about his refusal to support a one-year extension of expiring health insurance subsidies, which are at the center of the shutdown fight.

“It’s sad,” Lawler said, holding up a copy of a proposed bill to continue the subsidies, which come in the form of tax credits.

“Why don’t you just keep your mouth shut,” Jeffries said.

The ruckus drew a gaggle of onlookers, many of whom filmed the interaction, which went viral afterward. Talking to reporters after the fracas, Lawler said Democrats are “so full of (expletive), it’s not even funny.”

At a Cabinet meeting in the White House the next day, President Donald Trump weighed in on the shutdown with a series of jabs at the political oppoisiton. “We really don’t know who the hell is leading the Democrats,” Trump said.

Glimmers of bipartisanship

There are still some glimmers of bipartisanship in the halls of the Capitol.

Senators on both sides of the aisle are still talking to each other. Back-channel conversations continue among lawmakers on a potential health care deal that could help bring Democrats around to voting to reopen the government, though Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Oklahoma, described those negotiations this week as “stalled.”

Likewise, Gallego gave the GOP some credit. “I’ve been talking to my Republican friends,” he told reporters. “They do want to figure out a way out.”

http://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/10/11/government-shutdown-trump-democrats/86608206007/

MSNBC: ‘Pam Bondi is a fool’: Marc Elias blasts Trump’s Attorney General

Attorney General Pam Bondi faced questions from senators about National Guard deployments and immigrant arrests in U.S. cities, the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, and files related to Jeffrey Epstein, and more. Democracy Docket founder Marc Elias joins The Weeknight to unpack the contentious hearing and what it reveals about the Justice Department’s independence.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pam-bondi-is-a-fool-marc-elias-blasts-trump-s-attorney-general/vi-AA1O3cGW

Atlantic: Trump Might Be Losing His Race Against Time

The president is gambling that he can consolidate authority before the public turns too sharply against him.

President Donald Trump is worried that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving too slowly to prosecute his political adversaries on fake charges. Trump has good reason to be concerned. He is carrying out his project to consolidate authoritarian power against the trend of declining public support for his administration and himself. He is like a man trying to race upward on a downward-moving escalator. If he loses the race, he will be pulled ever deeper below—and the escalator keeps moving faster against him.

Autocracies are headed by one man but require the cooperation of many others. Some collaborators may sincerely share the autocrat’s goals, but opportunists provide a crucial margin of support. In the United States, such people now have to make a difficult calculation: Do the present benefits of submitting to Trump’s will outweigh the future hazards?

As Bondi makes her daily decisions about whether to abuse her powers to please Trump, she has to begin with one big political assessment: Will Trump ultimately retain the power to reward and punish her? It’s not just about keeping her present job. On the one hand, people in Trump’s favor can make a lot of money from their proximity to power. On the other, Richard Nixon’s attorney general, John Mitchell, served 19 months in prison for his crimes during Watergate. If Trump’s hold on power loosens, Bondi could share Mitchell’s fate.

Trump’s hold on power is indeed loosening. His standing with the voting public is quickly deteriorating. Grocery prices jumped in August 2025 at the fastest speed since the peak of the post-pandemic inflation in 2022. Job growth has stalled to practically zero.

Almost two-thirds of Americans disapprove of higher tariffs, Trump’s signature economic move. His administration’s attack on vaccines for young children is even more unpopular. This year has brought the highest number of measles cases since the Clinton administration introduced free universal vaccination for young children in 1993. Parents may be rightly shocked and angry.

Shortly after MSNBC reported that Tom Homan, Trump’s border czar, had accepted $50,000 in cash from FBI agents posing as businessmen last year, allegedly in exchange for a promise to help secure government contracts, the pro-Trump podcaster Megyn Kelly posted, “We DO NOT CARE.” This kind of acquiescence to corruption has been one of Trump’s most important resources. But the American people become a lot less tolerant of corruption in their leaders when they feel themselves under economic pressure. As of early August, nearly two-thirds of Americans regarded Trump as corrupt, 45 percent as “very corrupt.” More than 60 percent think the Trump administration is covering up the Jeffrey Epstein case. Almost 60 percent regard Bondi personally responsible for the cover-up.

The MAGA project in many ways resembles one of former businessman Donald Trump’s dangerously leveraged real-estate deals. A comparatively small number of fanatics are heart-and-soul committed. Through them, Trump controls the Republican apparatus and the right-wing media world, which allows him to do things like gerrymander states where he is in trouble (50 percent of Texans now disapprove of Trump, while only 43 percent approve) or wield the enforcement powers of the Federal Communications Commission to silence on-air critics. But overleveraged structures are susceptible to external shocks and internal mistakes.

Trump in his first term mostly avoided screwing up the economy. His trade wars with China triggered a nearly 20 percent stock-market slump in the fall and early winter of 2018. Trump retreated, and no recession followed the slump until the COVID shock of 2020. But in his second term, Trump has jettisoned his former economic caution. The stock market is doing fine in 2025 on hopes of interest-rate cuts. The real economy is worsening. The percentage of Americans who think the country is on the “wrong track” rose sharply over the summer. Even self-identified Republicans are now more negative than positive.

The souring is especially bitter among younger people. More than 60 percent of Republicans younger than 45 say things are on the wrong track, a 30-point deterioration over the three summer months.

Trump has a shrewd instinct for survival. He must sense that if he does not act now to prevent free and fair elections in 2026, he will lose much of his power—and all of his impunity. That’s why he is squeezing Bondi. But for her, the thought process must be very different. Trump is hoping to offload culpability for his misconduct onto her. She’s the one most directly at risk if she gives orders later shown to be unethical or illegal.

The survival of American rights and liberties may now turn less on the question of whether Pam Bondi is a person of integrity—which we already know the dismal answer to—than whether she is willing to risk her career and maybe even her personal freedom for a president on his way to repudiation unless he can fully pervert the U.S. legal system and the 2026 elections.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/09/trump-bondi-edva/684292

MSNBC: Lawrence on James Comey indictment: ‘Now the phrase Trumped up charges has new meaning’ [Video]

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell analyzes the Trump Justice Department’s indictment of former FBI Director James Comey after Donald Trump, in a now-deleted social media post, called James Comey “guilty as hell.” 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/lawrence-on-james-comey-indictment-now-the-phrase-trumped-up-charges-has-new-meaning/vi-AA1NkDiX

Daily Beast: Trump’s Goons Topple 12-Foot Statue of Him and Epstein

The 12-foot bronze had got a permit from the federal government—but then vanished.

A towering 12-foot statue of President Donald Trump and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein holding hands mysteriously appeared on the Capitol Mall early Tuesday.

By sunrise Wednesday, it had vanished.

The United States Park Police quietly removed the provocative bronze sculpture around 5:30 a.m., according to footage obtained by the Daily Beast.

The removal violates a permit issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) to “The Secret Handshake,” the group that claimed responsibility for the installation. The statue was authorized to remain on display across from the Capitol on 3rd Street, between Madison and Jefferson Avenues, until Sunday at 8 p.m., documents reviewed by the Daily Beast reveal.

The DOI is also required to notify the artists at least 24 hours before the statue is removed for any reason.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-and-epstein-statue-in-dc-vanishes-despite-legal-permit