Moneywise: ‘Can’t even afford to pick them’: Florida farmers plowing over perfectly good tomatoes as tariffs cause prices to plummet. How farmers are reacting

Tony DiMare’s family owns 4,000 acres of tomato farms across Florida and California. Sadly, his Florida crops are not looking good — mowed over and left to rot, like tomato vines across the state.

But it’s not growing conditions that are the problem. It’s economic ones.

DiMare told WSVN 7 Miami that President Donald Trump’s tariff and immigration policies are driving farmers to abandon their crops.

In January, he warned that Trump’s crackdown on migrants would squeeze farmers, who rely on migrants to pick produce.

“We have to secure our borders south and north, but you have to have a workforce in this country,” he told the Financial Post.

Deportations devastate farm workforce

About 50% of farm workers in the U.S. are undocumented migrants — including skilled supervisors and machine operators — according to Farmonaut, a farm technology company.

As the Trump administration proceeds with mass deportations of undocumented migrants, there are far fewer pickers in the fields, and crops are left to go bad.

One spoke to WSVN about fellow migrants leaving Florida each day. He spoke on condition of anonymity, concerned he might be deported himself

“A lot of people are really afraid, and sometimes they come, sometimes they don’t come,” he said. “And the harvest is lost because it cannot be harvested.”

The labor shortage also means Florida farmers have to pay more for labor. At the same time, they’re getting less money for their produce due to Trump’s tariff policies.

Tariffs upset traditional supply chain

From January through April, Trump’s threatened tariffs triggered Mexican suppliers to double or even triple tomato exports to the U.S. — before tariffs went into effect.

The result? The U.S. market was flooded with Mexican tomatoes. Florida farmers saw the wholesale price of a box of tomatoes plummet from $16 per box to $3 or $4. DiMare said tomato farmers need around $10 or $11 per box to break even.

“You can’t even afford to pick them right now,” said Heather Moehling, president of the Miami-Dade County Farm Bureau. “Between the cost of the labor and the inputs that goes in, it’s more cost-effective for the farmers to just plow them right now.”

It’s not just Florida tomato growers feeling the pinch. Canada has imposed a 25% tariff on U.S. watermelons in retaliation for Trump’s tariffs on Canadian products. DiMare knows one watermelon grower who’s lost Canadian customers to Mexican watermelon suppliers as a result.

Prepare for higher food costs

Farmonaut notes that the impacts of tariffs and immigration policy on farmers will have a knock-on effect in grocery stores. If U.S. farmers don’t have enough workers to harvest crops, Americans will have to buy more imported produce, and pay more due to tariffs.

The Food Policy Center at Hunter College of New York City warns that the resulting surge in food prices will drive inflation — “stressing household budgets across the nation, and particularly hurting families in areas with high food insecurity.”

While farmers have few options but to hope the political upheaval will end, consumers should prepare to mitigate those costs.

One way to do that is to buy a membership in a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) organization. You’ll be supporting local farmers and getting local, less costly produce delivered to your door.

In addition to shopping frugally by clipping coupons and shopping sales flyers deals, you can get creative in the kitchen. For example, you can limit food costs by planning weekly menus around seasonal and affordable foods.

https://moneywise.com/news/economy/florida-farmers-now-plowing-over-perfectly-good-tomatoes-as-trumps-tariff-policies-cause-prices-to-plummet

Bloomberg: Inside America’s Multi-Billion Dollar Immigration Detention System [Video]

President Donald Trump’s new deportation push has fueled record spending on detention facilities. We talk with the CEO of CoreCivic, one of the nation’s largest private prison firms, and look at how immigration policy is impacting his business. We also visit a community that hosts a major detention facility, and discuss the ongoing debate over profit and human rights.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/inside-america-s-multi-billion-dollar-immigration-detention-system/vi-AA1OhdCv

Fox News: GOP lawmaker pushes bill to punish cities that ditched Columbus Day after Trump proclamation

Rep Michael Rulli argued that Columbus Day and Indigenous Peoples Day should be separate

A new House GOP proposal would withhold funding from U.S. jurisdictions that celebrate Indigenous Peoples Day instead of Columbus Day.

It comes after President Donald Trump signed a proclamation last week declaring Oct. 13 Columbus Day in honor of the famed explorer as well as the heritage of Italian Americans across the U.S.

“This is about every son and daughter of Italy, every Knights of Columbus, every pasta dinner on Sunday, and every communion — everything that makes our culture who we are, from Philadelphia to San Francisco,” Rep. Michael Rulli, R-Ohio, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

“Every Little Italy neighborhood of this country celebrates Christopher Columbus. It’s so much more than the man. It’s the people.”

Rulli’s new bill would both reaffirm Columbus Day as a federal holiday and punish cities and states that replaced the celebration of it with Indigenous Peoples Day.

“We are not going to allow any American municipality to think that they have power over the federal government,” he said.

In 2021, then-President Joe Biden formally recognized the second Monday in October as both Columbus Day and Indigenous Peoples Day.

The move was lauded by progressive activists and historians who saw Christopher Columbus as the harbinger of a genocide against the land’s indigenous people, millions of whom were killed amid American colonization.

But Rulli argued that Columbus Day was about honoring Italian Americans’ heritage, pointing out that part of the motivation for its founding in 1892 was the extrajudicial lynching of 11 Italian Americans in New Orleans after the death of a local police chief.

He added his legislation was not meant to undercut the significance of Native Americans — whom he said deserve their own day of significance.

“I mean, the Native Americans are some of the most amazing, dynamic cultural people that make up the fabric of America. But they need their own special day,” Rulli said. “And I would be willing to do that. I’m saying right now, I would be willing to get the indigenous people their own day, but not this day.”

He further accused the Biden administration of undercutting the legacy of both peoples by declaring both holidays on the same day, while praising Trump for restoring Columbus Day’s original meaning.

“I don’t care what party you’re in … if you come from Italian American descent, you love what President Trump did. It was a wonderful olive branch to all Italian Americans,” Rulli said.

“By no means, no way, shape or form, is this bill meant to offend any of the indigenous people. They deserve their own day. We will get them their own day, but not Columbus Day. This has already been embedded in our fabric for 130 years,” he said.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-lawmaker-pushes-bill-punish-cities-ditched-columbus-day-after-trump-proclamation

Raw Story: Marine’s parents nabbed by ICE as they visited pregnant daughter on military base

The parents of a U.S. Marine in California were detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement last month while en route to visit their pregnant daughter. The father was deported Friday, NBC News reported.

Steve Rios, a U.S. Marine and resident of Oceanside, was traveling with his parents to Camp Pendleton to visit his sister who, along with her husband who’s also a U.S. Marine, is expecting her first child. The trio was stopped at the base’s entrance, however, when ICE agents detained Rios’ parents, who have no criminal history and have pending green card applications.

“I just kept on looking at my parents,” Rios told NBC News. “I didn’t know if it would be the last time I’d see them.”

Rios immediately texted his sister, Ashley Rios, about the incident as it was taking place, the news of which saw her break down in tears.

“My brother texted me that they got stopped,” Ashley Rios said, speaking with NBC News. “And as soon as I heard that, I just started, like, bawling.”

Rios’ parents – Esteban Rios and Luisa Rodriguez, who immigrated to the United States from Mexico more than 30 years ago – were briefly released from ICE custody following their detention, though with ankle monitors and an order to check back in with ICE officials.

Wearing a shirt and hat that bore the phrase “Proud dad of a U.S. Marine,” Rios’ father, alongside Rios’ mother, made good on their pledge to check back in with ICE officials, only for the father to be deported on Friday and the mother detained indefinitely, according to the report.

“It’s just hard because you just want to hear, like, your parents’ voice, that everything will be OK,” Ashley Rios said, telling NBC News that she was worried about her parents missing the birth of her first child. “I’d always want, like, my mom in that delivery room and everything, so it’s just hard to not think about your parents there.”

An ICE spokesperson released a statement regarding Rios’ parents’ arrests and deportation, in which they made a soft acknowledgment that undocumented immigrants with no criminal history, outside of immigrating to the country illegally, were also the target of President Donald Trump’s mass deportation policy.

“As part of its routine operations, ICE arrests aliens who commit crimes and other individuals who have violated our nation’s immigration laws,” the statement from ICE to NBC News reads. “All aliens in violation of U.S. immigration law may be subject to arrest, detention and, if found removable by final order, removal from the United States, regardless of nationality.”

https://www.rawstory.com/ice-2674179031

Newsweek: Ex-Clarence Thomas clerk sounds alarm on expected Supreme Court move

A former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas has issued a detailed warning about the Supreme Court‘s accelerating push to expand presidential power over federal agencies, coinciding with active cases that could overturn decades of precedent.

Caleb Nelson, a distinguished professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, published an analysis in September through NYU Law’s Democracy Project titled “Special Feature: Must Administrative Officers Serve at the President’s Pleasure?”, challenging the Court’s interpretation of presidential removal authority.

The alarm bells come as the Court prepares to hear arguments on whether President Donald Trump can fire officials at independent agencies without cause, with cases involving Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Federal Reserve officials already pending.

Newsweek reached out to the Supreme Court’s public information office via online form and the White House via email on Monday for comment.

Why It Matters

The Supreme Court’s trajectory on removal power could fundamentally restructure American government, affecting everything from consumer protection to monetary policy.

The stakes extend beyond theoretical constitutional interpretation. The Court has already allowed the Trump administration to proceed with mass immigration program terminations and other major policy changes through emergency orders while litigation continues, demonstrating the immediate real-world impact of these judicial decisions.

If the Court expands presidential removal authority, it would enable the White House to rapidly replace independent regulators and carry out major policy changes before courts can review them, with fewer practical checks on abrupt shifts in direction.

At stake is whether independent agencies like the FTC and Federal Reserve can maintain insulation from partisan political control.

What To Know

The constitutional dispute centers on a seemingly simple question with complex implications: who can fire federal officials, and under what circumstances?

Nelson explains that while Article II vests executive power in the president, the Constitution remains largely silent on removal except for impeachment. This silence has become a battleground for competing interpretations.

Chief Justice John Roberts has led the charge toward expanded presidential power, writing in Seila Law v. CFPB (2020) that presidential removal authority “follows from the text of Article II, was settled by the First Congress, and was confirmed in the landmark decision Myers v. United States.” The Court appears poised to extend this reasoning further, potentially overturning Humphrey’s Executor (1935), which has protected independent agency officials from at-will removal for nearly ninety years.

Nelson systematically challenges each pillar of Roberts’s argument.

He disputes that Article II’s “executive Power” includes the English monarch’s historical removal powers, citing recent scholarship distinguishing between executive authority and royal prerogative. He also contests the historical narrative about the First Congress, arguing that careful examination of 1789 debates reveals no consensus on presidential removal power, despite current Court assertions.

The practical implications are already visible. Georgetown law professor Steve Vladeck wrote on Substack earlier this month that the Trump administration sought emergency action from the Court 19 times in its first 20 weeks—matching the former President Joe Biden administration’s total over four years—and succeeded in 10 of 12 decided applications.

Recent immigration cases demonstrate this pattern: the Court allowed termination of parole programs for hundreds of thousands of migrants and permitted deportations to proceed despite lower court injunctions requiring notice and opportunity to seek protection.

What People Are Saying

Professor Caleb Nelson, in his analysis: “If most of what the federal government currently does on a daily basis is ‘executive,’ and if the President must have full control over each and every exercise of ‘executive’ power by the federal government (including an unlimitable ability to remove all or almost all executive officers for reasons good or bad), then the President has an enormous amount of power—more power, I think, than any sensible person should want anyone to have, and more power than any member of the founding generation could have anticipated.”

He added: “I am an originalist, and if the original meaning of the Constitution compelled this outcome, I would be inclined to agree that the Supreme Court should respect it until the Constitution is amended through the proper processes. But both the text and the history of Article II are far more equivocal than the current Court has been suggesting. In the face of such ambiguities, I hope that the Justices will not act as if their hands are tied and they cannot consider any consequences of the interpretations that they choose.”

Judge Clay D. Land, Middle District of Georgia, in a May decision: “Allowing constitutional rights to be dependent upon the grace of the executive branch would be a dereliction of duty by this third and independent branch of government and would be against the public interest.”

Justice Elena Kagan, at a judicial conference in California in July: “Courts are supposed to explain things. Offering reasons for judicial decisions is an essential protection against arbitrary power—to ensure that like cases are being treated alike.”

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in November regarding presidential authority to impose tariffs under emergency powers, while removal cases involving FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook await resolution.

The Court’s decisions could eliminate statutory protections for independent agency officials, potentially affecting thousands of positions across agencies overseeing financial markets, consumer protection, communications, and trade.

https://www.newsweek.com/ex-clarence-thomas-clerk-sounds-alarm-expected-supreme-court-move-10873224

Slingshot News: ‘Politico Is Fake News’: Trump Puts His Partisanship On Display, Belittles Reporter For Asking Him A Question During Press Gaggle

During his remarks in a press gaggle today, President Trump belittled a reporter for asking him a question. Trump refused to answer, stating, “Politico is fake news.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/politico-is-fake-news-trump-puts-his-partisanship-on-display-belittles-reporter-for-asking-him-a-question-during-press-gaggle/vi-AA1Olldz

Slingshot News: ‘You’d Think They’d Want Kristi’: Trump Says He Can’t Believe Americans Don’t Like Kristi Noem During Cabinet Meeting At The White House [Video]

During his remarks at a cabinet meeting at the White House this month, President Trump stated that he can not believe Americans do not like Kristi Noem. Trump stated, “You’d think that they’d want Kristi.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/you-d-think-they-d-want-kristi-trump-says-he-can-t-believe-americans-don-t-like-kristi-noem-during-cabinet-meeting-at-the-white-house/vi-AA1OlCsS

Reuters: Appeals court rejects Trump request to deploy National Guard in Chicago area

A federal appeals court on Saturday rejected the Trump administration’s request to immediately allow the deployment of National Guard troops to Illinois, leaving in place a lower court’s order that blocked the mobilization temporarily.

In a brief order, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the federal government remains barred from deploying troops but that any out-of-state Guard members in Illinois do not need to return to their home states for now. The mobilization had included hundreds of soldiers called up from the Texas National Guard.

U.S. District Judge April Perry had issued an order blocking the National Guard deployment on Thursday after expressing skepticism about the administration’s assertions that the soldiers were needed to protect federal agents from violent protesters.

A separate federal judge in Oregon has also blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to send troops to Portland, though another appellate court appeared poised to overrule that decision during arguments earlier this week.

In both cases, the Democratic governors of the states sued Trump, arguing that the administration deliberately miscast mostly peaceful demonstrations as violent to justify further deployments.    

Perry’s order is set to remain in effect until at least October 23, though she could extend it.

Trump has threatened to expand his campaign to other Democratic-led cities, after sending Guard troops this year to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., despite objections from their mayors.

A trial court in Los Angeles ruled the deployment of Guard troops there during the summer was illegal, though an appeals court later granted a stay of that ruling while the administration’s appeal is pending.

While the National Guard is part of the U.S. military, during domestic deployments it is usually controlled by governors in response to events such as natural disasters.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/appeals-court-rejects-trump-request-deploy-national-guard-chicago-area-2025-10-11

Miami Herald: Hegseth Faces Blowback Over Pentagon ‘Campaign Rally’

President Donald Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth recently convened a high-profile gathering of senior military leaders to outline the administration’s defense priorities and advocate for stringent military standards, a move critics likened to a campaign rally. The event drew scrutiny for its timing amid a government shutdown, with some military officials privately questioning Trump’s emphasis on deploying forces to address domestic unrest. The Pentagon announced plans to implement Hegseth’s proposed fitness standards by Jan. 2026, intensifying debates over the administration’s military reforms.

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell defended the event, stating, “The war on warriors is over.” He added, “Political correctness has no home at the Department of War. Today’s address cements a new but familiar culture we refer to as the warrior ethos and postures the department toward a new era of peace though strength.”

During the assembly, Trump and Hegseth focused on overhauling military practices, with Hegseth calling for rigorous fitness benchmarks and criticizing diversity-focused policies.

General Dan Caine praised the gathering, saying, “The event was an unprecedented opportunity and honor for the assembled senior officers and their top enlisted advisers to hear directly from the military’s civilian leadership.”

The Pentagon framed the event as advancing a “peace through strength” doctrine, explicitly rejecting “political correctness.” Democratic lawmakers condemned it as a misallocation of resources, urging greater attention to international security challenges.

Representative Pat Ryan (D-NY) voiced strong opposition, posting, “Deploying U.S. troops against U.S. citizens in American cities isn’t just Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) supported the administration’s approach, stating, “There needs to be more warfighter training.” He added, “We don’t do enough of it. We don’t do enough flying training. I like this approach … I thought it was a strong speech.”

Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) supported the administration’s approach, stating, “There needs to be more warfighter training.” He added, “We don’t do enough of it. We don’t do enough flying training. I like this approach … I thought it was a strong speech.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hegseth-faces-blowback-over-pentagon-campaign-rally/ss-AA1OihRx

OneIndia: Clash erupts between President Donald Trump and Illinois Governor [Video]

A fiery clash erupts between President Donald Trump and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker as Trump calls the governor a “dog” and claims he was “thrown out of his family business like a dog.” Pritzker fired back, labeling Trump a Nazi, escalating tensions in a battle of words that has captured national attention. Watch the explosive face-off and see why Chicago politics is in turmoil.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/clash-erupts-between-president-donald-trump-and-illinois-governor/vi-AA1OhQVH