Slingshot News: ‘We Don’t Even Know’: Trump Exposes Himself, Admits He’s Just Making Up Numbers About His Tariffs During Oval Office Announcement [Video]

During his remarks from the Oval Office several weeks ago announcing Apple’s additional U.S. investments, Donald Trump fessed up and stated that he didn’t even know what the numbers are for the “revenue” his tariffs are bringing in. “We don’t even know what the final number is,” Trump remarked.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/we-don-t-even-know-trump-exposes-himself-admits-he-s-just-making-up-numbers-about-his-tariffs-during-oval-office-announcement/vi-AA1MZXNw

Slingshot News: ‘China, Where’s Your Wind Farm?’: Trump Ignorantly Claims China Doesn’t Produce Wind Energy In Failed Attempt To Discredit Renewables [Video]

During his remarks at the Energy and Innovation Summit in Pennsylvania several weeks ago, Donald Trump ignorantly made the implication that China doesn’t produce wind energy. A quick search on the internet shows that China is the global leader in wind energy production.


The same fool, who criticizes European leaders for their reliance on wind power, is now chiding China for not generating enough wind energy.

Slingshot News: ‘Windmills Should Not Be Allowed!’: Trump Loses His Mind Over Renewable Energy, Derails Meeting With EU Commission President [Video]

During a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland several weeks ago, Donald Trump veered off topic and went on an unhinged tirade over windmills and wind energy. Trump exclaimed, “windmills should not be allowed!”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/windmills-should-not-be-allowed-trump-loses-his-mind-over-renewable-energy-derails-meeting-with-eu-commission-president/vi-AA1MZZaj

Slingshot News: ‘I Don’t Know If I Did It, But I Think I Did’: Trump Puts His Incompetence On Display, Rambles About Defense Spending During Remarks At NATO Event [Video]

During his remarks at a NATO event in June, President Trump put his incompetence on display while rambling about defense spending. Trump stated, “I don’t know if I did it, but I think I did.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-don-t-know-if-i-did-it-but-i-think-i-did-trump-puts-his-incompetence-on-display-rambles-about-defense-spending-during-remarks-at-nato-event/vi-AA1MYX47

Daily Beast: Trump’s Canadian Ambassador Blames Canada for Not Being MAGA

Pete Hoekstra voiced he was “disappointed” that Canadians weren’t very passionate about America.

America’s Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra is “disappointed” that Canadians don’t like America all that much.

“I’m disappointed that I came to Canada, a Canada (where) it is very, very difficult to find Canadians who are passionate about the American-Canadian relationship,” said Hoekstra during a luncheon with the Halifax Chamber of Commerce.

Hoekstra, 71, was the Michigan GOP chair before his appointment to the ambassadorship in April. His comments came the day after he said he was saddened Canada wasn’t excited about working with America on topics in their mutual national interests.

“Whether it’s energy, whether it’s automotive, whether it’s nuclear, defense and all of those types of things, we were hoping that we would not just renegotiate CUSMA, but that we could take it into being something much bigger,” he said, referring to the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement that deals with free trade between the three nations.

“It’s obvious, at least at this point in time, that that’s not going to happen,” he said.

Hoekstra took particular issue with Canada’s “Elbows Up” campaign, a grassroots campaign of national solidarity that sprung up as a result of the Trump administration’s tariffs on Canada and President Trump’s suggestions that Canada become the 51st state. The phrase “Elbows Up” comes from hockey, and it means to skate with one’s elbows up to repel checks from opposing players. It was used frequently by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on the campaign trail.

“‘Elbows up’… was an anti-American campaign. That has continued. That’s disappointing,” said Hoekstra.

Canadian government officials haven’t exactly voiced remorse for the country’s anti-American unity in recent months. On Wednesday, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the Trump administration’s 35% tariffs on Canadian goods have forced the country to “reinvent” its economy.

“It is sad, I would say, that our largest trading partner turned its back on Canada, which has led to us having to reassess how we’re going to build the economy of the future,” he said.

Canada dropped some its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in August, but it maintains a 25% tariff rate on U.S. cars, steel and aluminum.

Carney has voiced that he’s open to reopening the door for the United States to improve its trade policies with Canada.

“We have the ambition, but a deal is a deal, and a deal has to go for both sides, and Canada will agree to a deal that’s in the best interest of Canadians,” said Carney.

“It should not surprise anyone, including the U.S. ambassador.”

You insult them, you destroy their export markets with tariffs, and now you’re upset that they’re not “MAGA”?


https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-canadian-ambassador-blames-canada-for-not-being-maga


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-s-canadian-ambassador-blames-canada-for-not-being-maga/ar-AA1MY5Qm

MSNBC: ‘They know’ it’s dangerous: Republican backlash grows against Kimmel suspension [Video]

Backlash is growing in the Republican Party against the suspension of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” with even Republican Senator Ted Cruz blasting threats made by FCC chair Brendan Carr. Plus, Trump and the FCC are now threatening to revoke broadcast licenses of networks if they’re critical of the president. MSNBC contributor Jeremy Peters and staff writer for “The Atlantic” Adam Serwer joins “The Weekend” to discuss. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/they-know-it-s-dangerous-republican-backlash-grows-against-kimmel-suspension/vi-AA1MXrRt

Guardian: Tulsi Gabbard did not alert White House before revoking 37 security clearances

Exclusive: White House only realized afterwards that clearances at the CIA and in Congress had been rescinded

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, did not inform the White House that her office was revoking the security clearances of 37 people – including top deputies to the CIA director, John Ratcliffe – before it happened last month, according to three people familiar with matter.

The move caused consternation because it resulted in the White House not having an opportunity to closely vet the list before it became public and there appeared to be no paper trail from the president directing the effort, the people said.

As a result, officials only realized after the fact that Gabbard had managed to pull the security clearances of career CIA officials, at least one of whom was a top adviser to Ratcliffe and had worked on some of the US’s most sensitive military operations, the people said.

The list also included two Democratic congressional staffers – Maher Bitar, the national security adviser to senator Adam Schiff, and Thomas West, an aide on the Senate foreign relations committee – prompting fears the administration would be thrust into a messy separation-of-powers issue.

Weeks later, several of Trump’s top advisers remain deeply frustrated with Gabbard and view the episode as a blunder that comes as Trump is skeptical of the intelligence community and has suggested dismantling the office of the director of national intelligence (ODNI).

It also appears to have deepened existing animosity between Gabbard, whose most important job as the director of national intelligence is delivering the president’s daily briefing and overseeing the intelligence agencies, and the CIA, whose officers actually produce the brief.

Trump advisers inside and outside of the administration have complained that Gabbard’s deputy chief of staff, Alexa Henning, did not explain to them how the list was compiled and the underlying evidence to warrant pulling the security clearances, the people said.

A senior intelligence official disputed this account and said Gabbard told Trump in the Oval Office that she had compiled names of officers who had worked on the intelligence assessments on Russia’s malign influence operations during the 2016 election who should be fired.

Trump replied to Gabbard that if those people had worked on the Russia intelligence assessments and they were still employed in the federal government, they should be removed, and Gabbard was merely executing the president’s agenda, the intelligence official said.

The intelligence official also claimed the list was emailed to the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles; the White House counsel, David Warrington; communications chiefs Steven Cheung and Taylor Budowich; the national security council; and the chiefs of staff at every major intelligence agency.

“The CIA just wants to blame ODNI all the time,” the official said.

A White House spokesperson did not address whether there had been advance notice or when the emails were sent but said in a statement: “Director Gabbard is doing a phenomenal job and the White House has worked closely with her on implementing the President’s objectives.

“The entire administration is aligned on ensuring those who have weaponized their clearances to manipulate intelligence, leak classified intelligence without authorization, and many other egregious acts are held to account,” the spokesperson said.

Rescinding security clearances was supposed to be part of an effort to correct what Trump’s advisers view as flaws in intelligence assessments and to punish Trump’s political enemies for allegedly mischaracterizing intelligence about Russian malign influence operations during the 2016 election.

Gabbard said in the memo announcing the revocations last month that her actions were at Trump’s direction and claimed that the people targeted were involved in the “politicization or weaponization of intelligence” to advance partisan agendas, or had leaked classified information.

“Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,” Gabbard wrote. “Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.”

It was also in keeping with an executive order and followed the administration pulling security clearances for dozens of Trump’s political adversaries including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, as well as other figures from Trump’s first impeachment.

Gabbard is not expected to face significant ramifications over the episode, in large part because she has emerged relatively unscathed from other fraught moments, including when Trump in June publicly contradicted her assessment that Iran was far from acquiring nuclear weapons.

“I don’t care what she said,” Trump said in response to a question about Gabbard’s testimony that Iran had decided not to make a nuclear bomb, shortly after she was notably absent from a key meeting at Camp David on the matter. “I think they were very close to having it.”

Gabbard also drew Trump’s ire when she posted a video in June warning of nuclear annihilation. Trump harangued Gabbard, saying it would scare people and that she appeared more engaged in self-promotion in order to set herself up for higher office, a person familiar with the matter said.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/20/tulsi-gabbard-white-house-security-clearances

Daily Mail: Trump savages Pam [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi as he leaks brutal text message listing her failings… and tells her: I want Lindsey


Finally! King Donald savages one of his favorite Bimbos! But given that Pam “Bimbo #3” Bondi is dumb as a rock, does she really have a clue?


President Donald Trump has launched an extraordinary attack on Attorney General Pam Bondi over her failure to take Deep State scalps.

The president appeared to leak a private message he had sent to Bondi accusing her of ‘all talk, no action’ and demanding successful prosecutions of his political enemies.

Trump listed off FBI Director James Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff of California, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, claiming ‘they’re all guilty as hell,’ in the message shared to his Truth Social platform.

The president told Bondi, ‘We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility.’

Much of his fury was directed at the outgoing US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Erik Siebert, who declined to prosecute James for mortgage fraud over what he said was a lack of evidence. 

Siebert also failed to prosecute Comey after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused him of threatening Trump in a social media post. 

Siebert resigned last week but Trump in his Truth Social post claimed that he’d been fired.

‘He even lied to the media and said he quit, and that we had no case. No, I fired him, and there is a GREAT CASE, and many lawyers, and legal pundits, say so,’ Trump wrote.

Trump floated a replacement for Siebert in the post, Lindsey Halligan, a member of the White House counsel, who has a track record of defending the president in court – including the classified documents case.

In a follow-up post made about a half hour later, Trump officially announced his intention to nominate Halligan to the US Attorney position in Virginia’s eastern district.

He described Siebert as a ‘Democrat Endorsed ‘Republican” and said Halligan will ‘be Fair, Smart, and will provide, desperately needed, JUSTICE FOR ALL!’

Trump also walked back his prior exasperated tone with Bondi, saying she is ‘doing a GREAT job.’ 

The earlier post, which appeared to be a deliberate leak of a private text message he had sent to Bondi, was an extraordinary public attack on the nation’s top prosecutor.

Trump’s frustration with the AG over her failed efforts to prosecute his political enemies comes as her position is already weakened by the Jeffrey Epstein debacle.

Bondi, a longtime Trump loyalist who defended him during his first impeachment trial and served as Florida AG from 2011 to 2019, was appointed with expectations she’d aggressively pursue revenge and ‘drain the swamp.’

Trump’s main targets, Comey, Schiff and James, ran what the president describes as ‘witch hunts’, orchestrated by the Deep State to ruin his credibility before the electorate. 

Trump fired Comey as FBI chief in 2017 amid the FBI’s investigation into Russian election interference, which the president has repeatedly called a hoax.

Schiff, a vocal Trump critic and high-ranking Democrat Representative from California, led the 2019 impeachment inquiry into Trump over withholding aid from Ukraine.  

Democratic New York AG James brought the 2022 civil fraud trial against the Trump Organization which resulted in a $454 million judgment. It is currently under appeal.

Trump’s backers argue these figures represent the unchecked partisanship of the liberal elite; while his critics claim that his demands for prosecutions are an authoritarian overreach which ignores the rule of law.

The president has set his sights on the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, a key federal prosecutorial hub where he is pushing for investigations into the trio.

To help Bondi fulfil this task, Trump now wants his trusted attorney Halligan in the role.

The glamorous lawyer has been representing Trump for years, most prominently serving as one of his attorneys in the case against him for retaining classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.

In August 2024, that case was dismissed by US District Judge Aileen Cannon, with her arguing that Special Prosecutor Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional.

Smith appealed the ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which then formally dismissed the case in February 2025, marking its end.

More recently, Halligan was leading the charge in Trump’s review of historical exhibits at the Smithsonian.

In an August interview with Fox News, Halligan said slavery was an overemphasized topic at the museum in Washington, D.C.

‘The fact our country was involved in slavery is awful — no one thinks otherwise,’ she said. 

‘But what I saw when I was going through the museum, personally, was an overemphasis on slavery, and I think there should be more of an overemphasis on how far we’ve come since slavery.’

‘There’s a lot of history to our country, both positive and negative, but we need to keep moving forward. We can’t just keep focusing on the negative — all that does is divide us,’ she added.

Halligan’s new promotion comes after Bondi reportedly tapped Mary ‘Maggie’ Cleary to be the acting US attorney in that office.

Cleary has served as an assistant US attorney in the Western District of Virginia and is perhaps most known for her attempts to beat back an allegation made by an anonymous individual that she was present during the January 6 Capitol Riot.

Cleary, a deeply conservative Republican, was briefly placed on administrative leave but was cleared after a brief internal investigation, Politico reported.

If Halligan is to become the permanent US attorney, she will have to be confirmed by the Senate.

Since the Republicans have a 53-seat majority in the Senate, it is likely she will ascend to the position.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15118587/trump-attacks-pam-bondi-lindsey-halligan-replacement.html

Latin Times: UN Human Rights Experts Condemn U.S. Strikes on Venezuelan Boats as ‘Extrajudicial Executions’

“International law does not allow governments to simply murder alleged drug traffickers,” said the three independent UN experts in a statement on Tuesday

United Nations human rights experts have condemned recent U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan vessels, calling them “extrajudicial executions” in violation of international law. The operations, ordered by President Donald Trump, killed at least 14 people this month, according to both U.S. and UN accounts.

“International law does not allow governments to simply murder alleged drug traffickers,” three independent UN experts said in a statement on Tuesday. The experts, who report to the UN Human Rights Council but do not speak on behalf of the United Nations, stressed that lethal force is only lawful in situations of personal or immediate defense against an imminent threat to life.

The experts pointed to two incidents: the destruction of a boat on September 2 that killed 11 people and a second strike on September 15 that killed three more. They said the attacks violated both the right to life and the international law of the sea, which prohibits unprovoked attacks on civilian vessels and requires that interceptions be conducted through law enforcement, not military force.

“Criminal activities should be disrupted, investigated and prosecuted in accordance with the rule of law, including through international cooperation,” added the expert.

Trump has claimed that three Venezuelan boats in total have been “knocked off” by U.S. forces, though he has not clarified the details of the third. His administration has said the targeted vessels were linked to the Tren de Aragua criminal group, which the U.S. has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

The UN experts rejected the U.S. justification, saying there was “no evidence that this group is committing an armed attack against the U.S. that would allow the U.S. to use military force against it in national self-defence.” They urged Washington to investigate those responsible, prosecute perpetrators “no matter how senior in government,” and provide reparations to victims’ families.

The strikes come amid a major U.S. naval build-up in the Caribbean, which includes warships, submarines, and fighter jets. Administration officials have described the deployments as part of counter-narcotics operations, but Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has called them acts of aggression aimed at regime change.

The UN experts warned that the U.S. actions amount to a “lawless ‘war on narco-terrorism'” and urged Washington to step back. “International law does not permit the unilateral use of force abroad to fight terrorism or drug trafficking,” they said.

https://www.latintimes.com/un-human-rights-experts-condemn-us-strikes-venezuelan-boats-extrajudicial-executions-589654

Independent: Trump said he ate ‘whatever the hell they served us’ at Windsor banquet during UK state visit: Latest

Donald Trump’s visit to the UK finished without controversy despite a number of issues – including the recent sacking of US ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson – threatening to sour proceedings

Donald Trump has said he ate “whatever they hell they served us” during a banquet staged in his honour at Windsor Castle.

Trump said being with the “wonderful” King was the best part of his historic state visit to the UK, as he heaped praise on the royal family following his departure.

The US leader said he saw more paintings “than any human being has ever saw” and when asked what he ate at the Windsor Castle banquet staged in his honour, he said: “Whatever the hell they served us.”

Guests at the lavish event – attended by “the biggest people in the world” according to Mr Trump – were treated to Hampshire watercress panna cotta with parmesan shortbread and quail egg salad, followed by organic Norfolk chicken ballotine wrapped in courgettes, with a thyme and savoury infused jus.

Mr Trump, who is known to have a sweet tooth, is likely to have enjoyed the dessert – a bombe glacee cardinal, which is a vanilla ice cream bombe with Kentish raspberry sorbet interior with lightly poached Victoria plums.

Much more — hour-by-hour account — at the links below:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/trump-uk-visit-chequers-melania-starmer-latest-news-b2829542.html