Inquisitr: Donald Trump Struggles With Basic Math, Sparks Memes Over ‘500% Price Cut’ Claim

Trump’s math on drug prices is giving America a collective migraine.

Although President Donald Trump has consistently made dramatic claims, his most recent promise to cut the cost of prescription drugs drastically left many confused and chuckling aloud. Trump repeated his well-known talking point (that he is lowering drug prices) during his speech at the American Cornerstone Institute’s Founder’s Dinner at George Washington’s Mount Vernon estate.

The catch? His math skills were, well, let’s say, fit for a comedy sketch.

He bragged, “United States, you’re gonna see the biggest cuts in drug prices (…) we’re gonna literally be cutting prices by 500 percent, 600 percent,” before citing the bizarre example of prescription drugs costing $88 in London and $130 in the United States.

If you were wondering, the government (or pharmaceutical companies) would have to pay you to take medicine if prices were reduced by more than 100%! So, according to Trump, Americans will be leaving CVS with free insulin, inhalers, and a bonus check.

Associated Press fact-checkers quickly reminded everyone that Trump’s claims were false.

They mentioned that although his administration took steps to reduce costs, no one has ever seen the “1,200 to 1,500 percent” drops he constantly boasts about. Anything over 100% is not only erroneous but mathematically impossible, per the AP.

In a move to maintain some truth in the messaging, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said that it is still “committed to carrying out President Trump’s directive to lower prescription drug prices.” However, the numbers that Donald Trump was randomly flinging around had already gone viral, provoking social media memes and booing.

Mary Trump, Donald Trump’s outspoken niece, added fuel to the fire by mocking him in a video that went viral. She laughed at her uncle’s inflated claims, calling him an “incompetent moron” who was incapable of performing “basic arithmetic.”

“From what I understand about doing basic arithmetic, this would mean that at a discount of 1500%, the asthma inhaler I now pay $700 for every other month will (…) be free,” she said. “The pharmaceutical company that makes that inhaler will have to pay me $1493000 every time I get a refill.” She sarcastically broke down the calculations and concluded that “Everybody except Donald” seems to understand that cutting expenses by 1500% is mathematically impossible.

The trolling was swift and intense. People joked that Americans would soon become millionaires from filling their prescriptions if Trump’s calculations were correct. Others noted that he has been making these overblown claims for months; in August, for example, he used the exact phrase, “1,200, 1,300, 1,500 percent.”

Donald Trump’s claim that he is not only influencing drug prices but also changing economics has become something of a joke. Trump’s war on Big Pharma may have been an election promise that won over us, but his numbers affect his reputation.

Inquisitr: Trump Admin’s New Crackdown Demands Immigrants Prove ‘Good Moral Character’ Beyond Just Staying Out of Jail

New USCIS rule gives officers sweeping power to judge applicants’ morality, from traffic tickets to tax returns

When it comes to immigrants who want to become citizens of the United States, the second-term government of Donald Trump has turned on the moral compass. Although “good moral character” has long been an essential part of the naturalization process, the DOHS is now looking into more detailed areas of an applicant’s life as opposed to just checking boxes, as has been routine for so long. 

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a new directive on Friday directing officers to give much more weight to whether an applicant’s character truly embodies American values, which go beyond just avoiding jail time.

As a result, immigrants who wish to become citizens after getting a green card will have to submit to a more extensive and private assessment of their contributions, behavior, and even violations of traffic laws!

For many years, the term “good moral character” has been a part of U.S. immigration law. Naturalization applicants already had to prove they were not “habitual drunkards,” d–g traffickers, or convicted murderers.

Even so, the Trump administration wants officers to start digging deeper.

The memo encourages officers to perform a “holistic assessment” of an applicant’s life rather than just relying on a mechanical checklist that looks for serious crimes. Community involvement, caregiving responsibilities, lawful employment, time spent in the United States, tax history, and academic achievements must now be taken into account throughout the review process.

To put it simply, you might rack up moral points by raising your children, filing your taxes, and helping out at the local food bank. Yet, because of the increased scrutiny, even legally allowed behaviors that were previously thought of as trivial, such as constantly reckless driving, harassment, or “aggressive solicitation,” can now be used against you.

Officers have more discretion as a result of this change. However, they also have more freedom to reject applicants for reasons that are not going to be clear to them at the time of application or even after it gets rejected. 

According to the USCIS memo, “acts that are contrary to the average behavior of citizens in the jurisdiction where aliens reside” may be taken into account. It also means that a person’s bid for citizenship may be seriously limited by a poor driving record in California or unpaid child support in Texas — all pointing to their so-called “moral character.” 

The goal is to raise the standard for what it means to be an American. The policy seeks to “restore integrity” to the naturalization process, according to agency chief spokesman Matthew Tragesser, who spoke to ABC News. According to him, “U.S. citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship — it should only be offered to the world’s best of the best.”

Donald Trump’s larger political message (that citizenship is a privilege rather than a right and ought to be saved for people who actively uphold American values instead of just adhering to the law) is made possible by this framing.

The new policy, which puts stricter standards and gives immigration officers greater flexibility, is also in line with the administration’s ongoing attempts to restrict possible paths to citizenship.

Critics perceive a more cynical element at work, though. Joe Biden-era USCIS official Doug Rand contends the new rule was created to scare new applicants away. Rand claims that the administration is, in essence, discouraging legal immigrants from applying for citizenship by broadening the definition of “bad moral character” to include minor, non-criminal behavior.

Rand told ABC News, “They’re trying to increase the grounds for denial of U.S. citizenship by (…) torturing the definition of good moral character to encompass extremely harmless behavior.”

Between 600,000 and 1 million immigrants become citizens of the United States each year, the Irish Star reports

Years of legal residency, civics and English proficiency exams, and strict background checks are already part of the complex process. Now, staying true to constantly changing standards is more vital than avoiding crimes when defining “good moral character.”