Miami Herald: Sweeping ICE Arrests Spark Outrage

Trump-era deportation practices have impacted numerous long-term U.S. residents, with many having lived in the country for over a decade. The Kino Border Initiative found that many targeted individuals entered under previous administrations, raising concerns of family separations and a lack of due process.

Local and state law enforcement has contributed significantly in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)’s efforts, with over a third of deportations being triggered by police stops.

The Kino Border Initiative stated, “According to our survey responses, 57.2% of people deported were living in the U.S. at the time of their detention, compared to only 5% of deportees that KBI served in 2024.”

The Kino Border Initiative added, “Many of these individuals have deep roots in their communities, including U.S.-born children, spouses, and other dependents.”

Nearly 1,700 deportation flights by Global Crossing Airlines relocated thousands, with multiple transfers between detention centers creating what advocates have labeled a “purgatorial” state.

Human rights groups have criticized these practices as overly harsh, citing the hardship on families. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defended its procedures, saying transfers follow guidelines and immigrants are kept informed. Democratic lawmakers have called for reforms, emphasizing non-criminal cases.

DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said, “Parents, who are in the US illegally, can take control of their departure. Through the [Customs and Border Protection] Home App, the Trump administration is giving parents illegally in the country a chance to take full control of their departure and self-deport, with the potential ability to return the legal, right way and come back to live the American dream.”

McLaughlin added, “Rather than separate families, ICE asks parents if they want to be removed with their children or if the child should be placed with someone safe the parent designates.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/sweeping-ice-arrests-spark-outrage/ar-AA1N0v8l

Daily Beast: Trump’s Canadian Ambassador Blames Canada for Not Being MAGA

Pete Hoekstra voiced he was “disappointed” that Canadians weren’t very passionate about America.

America’s Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra is “disappointed” that Canadians don’t like America all that much.

“I’m disappointed that I came to Canada, a Canada (where) it is very, very difficult to find Canadians who are passionate about the American-Canadian relationship,” said Hoekstra during a luncheon with the Halifax Chamber of Commerce.

Hoekstra, 71, was the Michigan GOP chair before his appointment to the ambassadorship in April. His comments came the day after he said he was saddened Canada wasn’t excited about working with America on topics in their mutual national interests.

“Whether it’s energy, whether it’s automotive, whether it’s nuclear, defense and all of those types of things, we were hoping that we would not just renegotiate CUSMA, but that we could take it into being something much bigger,” he said, referring to the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement that deals with free trade between the three nations.

“It’s obvious, at least at this point in time, that that’s not going to happen,” he said.

Hoekstra took particular issue with Canada’s “Elbows Up” campaign, a grassroots campaign of national solidarity that sprung up as a result of the Trump administration’s tariffs on Canada and President Trump’s suggestions that Canada become the 51st state. The phrase “Elbows Up” comes from hockey, and it means to skate with one’s elbows up to repel checks from opposing players. It was used frequently by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on the campaign trail.

“‘Elbows up’… was an anti-American campaign. That has continued. That’s disappointing,” said Hoekstra.

Canadian government officials haven’t exactly voiced remorse for the country’s anti-American unity in recent months. On Wednesday, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the Trump administration’s 35% tariffs on Canadian goods have forced the country to “reinvent” its economy.

“It is sad, I would say, that our largest trading partner turned its back on Canada, which has led to us having to reassess how we’re going to build the economy of the future,” he said.

Canada dropped some its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in August, but it maintains a 25% tariff rate on U.S. cars, steel and aluminum.

Carney has voiced that he’s open to reopening the door for the United States to improve its trade policies with Canada.

“We have the ambition, but a deal is a deal, and a deal has to go for both sides, and Canada will agree to a deal that’s in the best interest of Canadians,” said Carney.

“It should not surprise anyone, including the U.S. ambassador.”

You insult them, you destroy their export markets with tariffs, and now you’re upset that they’re not “MAGA”?


https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-canadian-ambassador-blames-canada-for-not-being-maga


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-s-canadian-ambassador-blames-canada-for-not-being-maga/ar-AA1MY5Qm

MSNBC: ‘They know’ it’s dangerous: Republican backlash grows against Kimmel suspension [Video]

Backlash is growing in the Republican Party against the suspension of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” with even Republican Senator Ted Cruz blasting threats made by FCC chair Brendan Carr. Plus, Trump and the FCC are now threatening to revoke broadcast licenses of networks if they’re critical of the president. MSNBC contributor Jeremy Peters and staff writer for “The Atlantic” Adam Serwer joins “The Weekend” to discuss. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/they-know-it-s-dangerous-republican-backlash-grows-against-kimmel-suspension/vi-AA1MXrRt

Independent: Trump said he ate ‘whatever the hell they served us’ at Windsor banquet during UK state visit: Latest

Donald Trump’s visit to the UK finished without controversy despite a number of issues – including the recent sacking of US ambassador Lord Peter Mandelson – threatening to sour proceedings

Donald Trump has said he ate “whatever they hell they served us” during a banquet staged in his honour at Windsor Castle.

Trump said being with the “wonderful” King was the best part of his historic state visit to the UK, as he heaped praise on the royal family following his departure.

The US leader said he saw more paintings “than any human being has ever saw” and when asked what he ate at the Windsor Castle banquet staged in his honour, he said: “Whatever the hell they served us.”

Guests at the lavish event – attended by “the biggest people in the world” according to Mr Trump – were treated to Hampshire watercress panna cotta with parmesan shortbread and quail egg salad, followed by organic Norfolk chicken ballotine wrapped in courgettes, with a thyme and savoury infused jus.

Mr Trump, who is known to have a sweet tooth, is likely to have enjoyed the dessert – a bombe glacee cardinal, which is a vanilla ice cream bombe with Kentish raspberry sorbet interior with lightly poached Victoria plums.

Much more — hour-by-hour account — at the links below:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/trump-uk-visit-chequers-melania-starmer-latest-news-b2829542.html

Axios Sneak Peek: U.S. conducts fourth strike against vessel transferring drugs, Trump says

The U.S. military conducted a strike on Friday against a vessel that was allegedly transferring drugs, President Trump said.

Why it matters: This was the fourth such strike in recent weeks as part of a broader Trump administration military campaign against drug traffickers off the coasts of Venezuela.

What he is saying: Trump wrote on his Truth Social account that the vessel was attacked in international waters in the U.S. military southern command area of responsibility. He also posted a video of the strike.

  • He claimed the vessel was “affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization conducting narcotrafficking” and that “three male narcoterrorists” were killed in the strike. No U.S. forces were harmed, Trunp noted.
  • “Intelligence confirmed the vessel was trafficking illicit narcotics, and was transiting along a known narcotrafficking passage enroute to poison Americans”, Trump claimed.
  • “STOP SELLING FENTANYL, NARCOTICS, AND ILLEGAL DRUGS IN AMERICA, AND COMMITTING VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM AGAINST AMERICANS!!!”, he stressed.

The big picture: President Trump ordered seven warships carrying 4,500 personnel — including three guided-missile destroyers and at least one attack submarine — to the waters off Venezuela.

  • Axios Marc Caputo wrote that even close Trump advisers aren’t entirely sure whether the gunboat diplomacy is a drug trafficking operation with undertones of regime change, or a Caracas coup operation masquerading as drug enforcement.

https://www.axios.com/2025/09/20/us-strikes-vessel-drugs-trump-narcotics

Fox News: Trump warns Afghanistan over return of strategic Bagram Air Base to US control [Video]

The Taliban has controlled the airbase since 2021 and the US withdrew troops from the country

President Donald Trump on Saturday threatened Afghanistan, which is governed by the Taliban, if Bagram Air Base isn’t returned to the United States. 

“If Afghanistan doesn’t give Bagram Airbase back to those that built it, the United States of America, BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN!!!” he wrote on Truth Social. 

The president didn’t elaborate on what consequences the country might face.

On Thursday, the president said the administration is “trying” to get the former U.S. Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan “back” from the Taliban.

In remarks to the press while standing alongside U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the president criticized the handling of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan under President Joe Biden and said he had “a little breaking news.”

“We’re trying to get it back,” Trump said. “We’re trying to get it back because they need things from us.”

Trump did not expand on whom he was referring to or, if referring to the Taliban, the terrorist organization that took over the country in 2021, what they “need” from the U.S.

“We want that base back, but one of the reasons we want the base is, as you know, it’s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons,” Trump added. 

On Saturday evening, Trump told reporters the administration wants Bagram back “right away,” and “if they don’t do it, you’re going to find out what I’m going to do.” 

The Taliban took over the country after the U.S. pulled out of Afghanistan in 2021. 

The U.S. claimed Bagram Air Base, which was built by the Soviets in the 1950s, in 2001 when the military went into Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks. 

In 2021, when the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan, it secretly left the base in the middle of the night on July 1, leaving it to the Afghan government. 

The Taliban captured the base six weeks later in August of 2021, on the same day Kabul fell. 

Earlier this year, White House hostage envoy Adam Boehler met with Taliban officials in Kabul while working to get hostage George Glezmann released, the first direct meeting since the pullout in 2021. 

Boehler, along with another U.S. envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, met with the Taliban’s foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, and reportedly discussed ways to “develop bilateral relations between the two countries, issues related to citizens, and investment opportunities in Afghanistan,” according to a Taliban statement. 

The removal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan began during the first Trump administration in March 2020, and open-source intelligence showed that the Taliban had been making gains across Afghanistan in the year leading up to the August 2021 withdrawal. 

Under the deal forged by the first Trump administration, the U.S. agreed to withdraw all U.S. forces by May 1, 2021, but Biden extended the withdrawal date to August 2021. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-warns-afghanistan-over-return-strategic-bagram-airbase-us-control

Talking Points Memo: Trump Administration Loses Plot During ‘Free Speech’ Struggle Session

Hello it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️

To some extent, every new excess by the Trump administration is unsurprising to us, the writers and editors of Talking Points Memo, and, I imagine, to you, our readers. These guys told us what they were going to do, after all. It sounded authoritarian. Trump’s own former military leaders said he was “fascist.” But given that priming, we heavy consumers of news can, I think, sometimes lose track of how far the Trump administration has gone, even by its own standards.

Nicole on Thursday flagged an interview with CNBC during which FCC director Brendan Carr outlined his belief that both his agency and the “media ecosystem” overall are in the midst of a “massive shift” given the “permission structure that President Trump’s election has provided.”

“And I would simply say we’re not done yet with seeing the consequences of that,” Carr said.

“Will you only be pleased when none of these comedians have a show on broadcast television?” CNBC anchor David Faber asked.

“No, it’s not any particular show or any particular person,” Carr replied. “It’s just we’re in the midst of a very disruptive moment right now, and I just, frankly, expect that we’re going to continue to see changes in the media ecosystem.”

Carr and the rest of the Trump administration have tried to get a lot of mileage out of the whole idea that the 2024 election represented a substantiation of an American cultural “vibe shift” post-COVID (though Carr’s talk of a new, Trumpian “permission structure” is a particularly chilling way to articulate that idea).

But setting aside that Trump’s electoral victory was, in the end, not that large, are Trump’s leaders in government still doing what they understood themselves to have won permission to do?

“This was all in Project 2025, btw,” an actor from “Glee” tweeted, and Carr at 11:43 p.m. replied with that GIF of Jack Nicholson nodding with an ecstatic, unhinged look, a seeming affirmation that, yes, this was all the plan.

But was it? Carr, in fact, wrote the FCC chapter of Project 2025. There was nothing about revoking broadcast licenses or using the “Equal Time” rule in creative ways, as he has threatened to do with “The View,” a program that is seemingly his next ABC-broadcast target. “The FCC should promote freedom of speech,” his chapter of Project 2025 began.

That’s an ideal his party is now seemingly somewhat confused about. Early this week, Pam Bondi got in trouble for trying to distinguish anti-Charlie Kirk “hate speech” from “free speech.” “An FCC license, it’s not a right. It really is a privilege,” Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) told Semafor on Thursday. “Under normal times, in normal circumstances, I tend to think that the First Amendment should always be sort of the ultimate right. And that there should be almost no checks and balances on it. I don’t feel that way anymore,” she added. Other Republicans took the opposite side of the issue, with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) of all people calling Carr’s tactics “right out of Goodfellas.”

It’s in these moments where the Trump administration and its allies lose the plot — when they do an about-face on the same ideas they bear hugged in weeks and months and years prior, casting about for enemies to punish — that the MAGA coalition frays a bit, straining under the weight of cognitive dissonance. We saw the same thing with Trump’s short-lived war on Iran and, much more so, with his aggressive insistence that there was nothing important going on with that Jeffrey Epstein guy. The cause of ending cancel culture launched a thousand MAGA-aligned influencer careers; it is the supposed raison d’être of entire MAGA-friendly publications. Now that the government they serve has turned the page on free speech, what do they do?

It’s not just the MAGA faithful. Booting a late-night host watched by millions from the air over some muddled remarks about your slain political ally is the kind of thing that gets the attention of the “normies” who have decided to tune out from the whole lurid spectacle of American democracy in 2025. (Ditto for revising childhood vaccine recommendations while confessing you’re not even totally clear what you’re voting on.)

Ten years into this, only fools predict we’ve reached the beginning of the end of Donald Trump. And that’s not what I’m saying. But moments like these are not good for Trump’s already limited base of support, and bring us toward the next chapter of America’s authoritarian experiment, whatever that chapter may be.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/the-weekender/the-trump-admins-free-speech-struggle-session

BBC: Sikh granny’s arrest by US immigration sparks community anger

The visiting room of the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Centre in Bakersfield, California, is small, loud, and crowded. When Harjit Kaur’s family arrived to see her, they could barely hear her – and the first words they caught shattered them.

“She said, ‘I would rather die than be in this facility. May God just take me now’,” recalled her distraught daughter-in-law, Manjit Kaur.

Harjit Kaur, 73, who unsuccessfully applied for asylum in the US, and has lived in California for more than three decades, was arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials on 8 September, sparking shock and sympathy from the Sikh community across the state and beyond.

Harjit Kaur had filed several asylum appeals over the years which were rejected, with the last denial in 2012, her lawyer said.

Since then, she had been asked to report to immigration authorities every six months. She was arrested in San Francisco when she had gone for a check-in.

It comes amid a wider crackdown by the Donald Trump administration on immigration, and especially alleged illegal immigrants in the US.

The issue is a sensitive one – the country is grappling with how to deal with the hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers who arrive at its borders every year. More than 3.7 million asylum cases are pending in immigration courts. An increased budget for immigration enforcement means ICE is now the highest-funded federal law enforcement agency.

Trump has said he wants to deport the “worst of the worst”, but critics say immigrants without criminal records who follow due process have also been targeted.

“Over 70% of people arrested by ICE have no criminal conviction,” said California State Senator Jesse Arreguin in a statement demanding Harjit Kaur’s release. “Now, they are literally going after peaceful grandmothers. This shameful act is harming our communities.”

US Congressman John Garamendi, who represents the Californian district where Harjit Kaur lives, has submitted a request to ICE for her release.

“This administration’s decision to detain a 73-year-old woman – a respected member of the community with no criminal record who has faithfully reported to ICE every six months for more than 13 years – is one more example of the misplaced priorities of Trump’s immigration enforcement,” a spokesperson said.

In an emailed statement, ICE told the BBC that Harjit Kaur had “exhausted decades of due process” and that an immigration judge had ordered her removal in 2005.

“Harjit Kaur has filed multiple appeals all the way up to the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals and LOST each time. Now that she has exhausted all legal remedies, ICE is enforcing US law and the orders by the judge; she will not waste any more US tax dollars,” it added.

Harjit Kaur came to the US in 1991 with her two minor sons after the death of her husband, her lawyer Deepak Ahluwalia told the BBC. Her daughter-in-law Manjit Kaur said that the young widow wanted to shield her sons from and escape the political turbulence in India’s Punjab state at the time.

Over the next three decades, she worked modest jobs to raise her sons, one of whom is now a US citizen. Her five grandchildren are also US citizens.

Harjit Kaur, who lives in Hercules city in the San Francisco Bay Area, was working as a seamstress at a sari store for the past two decades and pays her taxes. Asylum applicants across the US are allowed to live, work and pay taxes legally once their claim is officially filed and in process.

Even after her final asylum appeal was rejected in 2012, her job permit was renewed every year.

After the rejection, her deportation seemed imminent, but she didn’t have the right documents to travel to India.

Indian missions in the US issue emergency certificates – a one-way travel document – to Indians of invalid status to enable them to return. This would require verifying Harjit Kaur’s origin and identity in Punjab through photos, cross-checking with relatives or acquaintances or finding old records, which would take at least a few weeks.

More than a decade since the rejection, neither Harjit Kaur nor US immigration officials have been able to get a travel permit for her. Manjit Kaur said they visited the Indian consulate in San Francisco in 2013 for this but didn’t succeed. India’s Consul General at San Francisco K Srikar Reddy told the BBC they had no record of Harjit Kaur applying for travel documents to India.

ICE did not respond to a question about why it did not get a travel permit in the past 13 years.

Mr Ahluwalia said he is following up with the Indian consulate for the documents which “ICE was unable to procure for the last 13 years”. The consulate says they are “facilitating all necessary consular assistance”.

Harjit Kaur’s family, meanwhile, say she never questioned her deportation and should not have been detained.

“Provide us the travel documents and she is ready to go,” Manjit Kaur said. “She had even packed her suitcases back in 2012.”

Right now, their immediate concern is getting her out of the detention centre.

“You can put an ankle monitor on her. We can check in with immigration when you want,” said Manjit Kaur. “Just get her out of the facility and when you provide us the travel documents, she will self-deport to India.”

Her lawyer said that when he met Harjit Kaur on 15 September, she had not been provided with her regular medication. He alleged that she had been “dragged by guards”, “denied a chair or a bed” and was “forced to sit on the floor” for hours in a holding cell despite having undergone double knee replacement.

He also alleged that she was “explicitly refused water” and not provided a vegetarian meal for the first six days.

ICE did not respond to specific questions on these allegations, but had earlier told BBC Punjabi that “it is a long-standing policy that as soon as someone comes into ICE custody, they are given full health care”.

Detainees have access to “medical appointments and 24-hour emergency care” and no-one “is denied essential care at any time during detention”, it added.

Kulvinder Singh Pannu, president of the gurdwara committee at The Sikh Centre in San Francisco Bay Area, says that Bibi Harjit (a respectful way to refer to an elderly Punjabi woman) is well-liked in the area.

“She always helped people in our community with whatever she had financially,” he said.

“A couple of hundred people turned up by themselves to protest against her arrest,” he said, referring to a 12 September agitation outside the Sikh temple in California.

As the uncertainty continues, Harjit Kaur’s supporters are planning to hold more protests, including in other US cities, with many saying they are touched by her plight.

A single mother, Harjit Kaur had formed deep roots and relationships in the US over the past 30 years. Her parents and siblings in India are no longer alive, says Mr Ahluwalia.

“She has no-one, no home, no land to return to.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgq63lgn7zo

Newsweek: Trump administration asks Supreme Court for new emergency order

The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to let it move forward with ending protections for more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants. The Justice Department is seeking to block a San Francisco judge’s ruling that found the administration acted unlawfully when it terminated Temporary Protected Status for the group.

A federal appeals court declined to halt U.S. District Judge Edward Chen’s decision while the case proceeds.

In May, the Supreme Court had already overturned another Chen order affecting about 350,000 Venezuelans, without explanation, as is typical for emergency appeals. Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices the earlier ruling should guide them again.

Why It Matters

The Trump administration has taken a hardline stance on Temporary Protected Status, arguing that the protections are meant to be temporary but have been abused by consecutive administrations. Immigration advocates have countered, saying that conditions in Venezuela and other countries have not improved enough to send people home.

What To Know

Friday’s plea by the Trump administration continues a cycle of court orders and challenges around the attempts by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to end TPS for two groups of Venezuelans.

“This case is familiar to the Court and involves the increasingly familiar and
untenable phenomenon of lower courts disregarding this Court’s orders on the emergency docket,” the administration wrote in its submission to the Supreme Court.

The argument is that Chen’s final order in the case rested on the same legal basis that had been stayed by the Supreme Court just months earlier.

This back-and-forth has left around 300,000 Venezuelans in limbo, alongside thousands more in a second group also facing the potential loss of their legal status.

Under TPS, immigrants from designated countries are allowed to remain in the United States without fear of deportation. They are granted permission to work while in the U.S., and can sometimes travel out of the country.

Noem and her predecessors hold the power to grant and revoke TPS per country. Status is renewed every 18 months, and the first Trump administration made similar attempts to revoke it but also faced legal challenges, which continued until President Joe Biden took office in 2021.

Part of Noem’s reasoning is that conditions in Venezuela have improved significantly, meaning it is safe for immigrants to return home. This has not necessarily aligned with the broader Trump administration’s views on the South American nation and its leader, Nicolas Maduro.

Trump Admin Moves to Revoke TPS for Syria

Also on Friday, the DHS moved to revoke TPS for another country: Syria.

In a Federal Register notice, the DHS reiterated that conditions had improved in the country, indicating that TPS was no longer necessary. Protections are set to lapse on September 30, 2025.

Protections were first introduced in 2012, at the height of the unrest in the Middle East at the time.

What People Are Saying

The Trump administration, in its filing to the Supreme Court Friday: “Since the statute was enacted, every administration has designated countries for TPS or extended those designations in extraordinary circumstances. But Secretaries across administrations have also terminated designations when the conditions
were no longer met.”

Adelys Ferro, co-founder and executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, told Newsweek on August 29: “We, more than 8 million Venezuelans, just didn’t leave the country just because it’s fun, it’s because we had no choice…Venezuelans with TPS are not a threat to the United States.”

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court must now decide whether to take up the appeal.

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-donald-trump-immigrants-deportation-venezuela-migrants-2132804

Axios: Trump to Harvard: Hand over race data or face enforcement

The Trump administration warned Harvard on Friday that it would “face further enforcement action” if it refuses to turn over more information about the university’s use of race in admissions.

Why it matters: The warning continues the administration’s push to exert broad control over America’s higher-learning institutions as Trump seeks to eradicate what he calls “anti-white racism,” a reinterpretation at odds with the nation’s history.

What they’re saying: “No one – not even Harvard – is above the law,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a press release.

  • “We will not allow any institution to disregard its obligation to uphold students’ civil rights.”
  • “The Trump Administration will continue to use all legal tools available to restore accountability and transparency to our nation’s institutions.”

Yes, but: The Education Department hasn’t said what “further enforcement action” would mean, leaving the scope of potential consequences vague.

  • The Education Department and Harvard did not respond to Axios’ request for comment.

Catch up quick: The Supreme Court ruled that colleges cannot consider an applicant’s race in the admissions process in 2023, effectively banning affirmative action.

  • Trump also signed a memo in August requiring federally funded higher-education institutions to submit applicant data.

Zoom in: The administration launched its admissions investigation in May. Since then, it has routinely singled-out Harvard.

Zoom out: Trump officials seek to eliminate the diversity, equity and inclusion policies intended to level the playing field for minorities in systems that once favored white people.

What we’re watching: The letter gives Harvard 20 days to hand over admissions data.

https://www.axios.com/2025/09/19/trump-harvard-race-admissions-data