Bloomberg: Murdoch Calls Trump’s Epstein Suit ‘Affront’ to Free Speech

Rupert Murdoch and News Corp. asked a US judge to throw out President Donald Trump’s $10 billion libel lawsuit over a Wall Street Journal report tying him to a bawdy birthday note to the late Jeffrey Epstein, calling the case “an affront to the First Amendment.”

The July 17 story about a note bearing Trump’s signature that was sent to Epstein along with a sketch of a naked woman in 2003 is true and doesn’t defame the president’s character, lawyers for the 94-year-old News Corp. chairman emeritus said Monday in a request to dismiss the suit.

“By its very nature, this meritless lawsuit threatens to chill the speech of those who dare to publish content that the President does not like,” Murdoch and News Corp. said in the filing in federal court in Miami.

Trump sued July 18, accusing Murdoch, News Corp. and Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co. of maligning his character. The suit was filed as the president was fighting a firestorm of criticism over the government’s handling of documents related to the late, disgraced financier. Epstein died in prison in 2019 as he faced sex-trafficking charges.

The Wall Street Journal story, which provided details of a “birthday book” of notes compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday, raised further pressure on Trump, who has long denied any awareness of Epstein’s activities. House Democrats investigating the sex-trafficking operation run by Epstein earlier this month released the alleged birthday note that they said Trump sent to the late disgraced financier.

“Two weeks ago, in response to a congressional subpoena, Epstein’s estate produced the Birthday Book, which contains the letter bearing the bawdy drawing and plaintiff’s signature, exactly as The Wall Street Journal reported,” Murdoch and News Corp. said in the filing.

The White House didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

Murdoch and News Corp. said in their filing that the First Amendment’s protections for truthful speech “are the backbone of the Constitution.”

Trump “acknowledged his friendship with Epstein,” Murdoch and News Corp. said in the filing. “As the article reports, three months before the Birthday Book was gifted to Epstein, a New York magazine article quoted the plaintiff as saying that he had known Epstein for ‘15 years’ and that Epstein was a ‘terrific guy,’ ‘a lot of fun to be with,’ and ‘likes beautiful women as much as I do.’”

Murdoch in August agreed to provide Trump’s lawyers with a sworn declaration “describing his current health condition” as well as regular updates on his health as part of a deal to delay any deposition in the case. 

The filing comes days after a judge tossed Trump’s $15 billion defamation suit against the New York Times, which accused it of serving as a “mouthpiece” for the Democrats. The judge in that case said Trump’s lawyers “unmistakably and inexcusably” violated court rules by featuring “repetitive,” “superfluous” and “florid” allegations and details in the complaint. The judge gave Trump permission to refile a shorter lawsuit within the rules.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-22/murdoch-asks-judge-to-toss-out-trump-s-10-billion-epstein-suit

CNN: Doctor refutes FDA commissioner on Tylenol & autism link


Thank you, CNN, for taking the time and effort to debunk this jibberish.


Never listen to a Health & Human Services Secretary who’s had brain worms and who eats road kill — ewwwwwwww!!!

Slingshot News: ‘You’re Failing As A Leader’: Cory Booker Tells Juvenile Kash Patel To His Face That Trump Will Fire Him In Tense Senate Hearing [Video]

During a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) tells FBI Director Kash Patel to his face that he’s “failing as a leader” and that President Trump won’t keep him around for long.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/you-re-failing-as-a-leader-cory-booker-tells-juvenile-kash-patel-to-his-face-that-trump-will-fire-him-in-tense-senate-hearing/vi-AA1N6cgK

Axios: ICE arrests rock Malden, Somerville

It’s a familiar scene: neighbors, attorneys and activists rallying with immigrant families over the loved ones lost in the federal immigration system.

  • Dozens came together in Malden on Monday, this time for Edgar Hernan Elias Escobar.

The big picture: Elias Escobar, a native of El Salvador with no criminal record, joins a growing population of newcomers disappearing from the streets of Malden, Somerville and other Boston-area communities in the past two weeks.

Catch up quick: Elias Escobar, an undocumented immigrant who was obtaining papers through a family-based petition from his wife, was stopped by immigration agents on his way to a construction job Wednesday.

  • Agents smashed his car window and pulled him out, even after his wife, Leslie Perlera Gonzalez, showed up saying he had a pending immigration petition, GBH News reported.
  • A Department of Homeland Security official later told Axios he refused to roll down his window and that the “officers took appropriate action and followed their training to use the minimum amount of force necessary to resolve the situation.”

State of play: Elias Escobar is detained in the Plymouth County Correctional Center with other immigrant detainees.

  • Greater Boston Legal Services, where Perlera Gonzalez works, filed a lawsuit alleging his rights were violated.

Yes, but: The Trump administration has fought habeas lawsuits over immigrant detainees tooth and nail since ramping up immigration enforcement this year.

Context: Immigrants have historically been allowed to adjust their status through a handful of avenues if they have a relative or spouse who is a U.S. citizen.

  • With the exception of the first Trump administration, it is uncommon for immigration officials to detain and seek to deport an immigrant mid-petition or with legal status if the person poses no public safety threat, said Maggie Morgan, managing attorney for the GBLS immigration unit.

Morgan says she has seen reports of immigration agents detaining people before confirming their identity or status.

  • “This is violating due process not just for those individuals, but for everyone in the community who could be at risk of having this happen to them,” Morgan said.

Zoom out: The LUCE hotline has received more than 100 calls in the last week flagging immigration enforcement activity.

  • Somerville residents tried to stop immigration agents from questioning a man they stopped. He complied and, within minutes, was placed in handcuffs despite having no known record, Rep. Mike Connolly told the Cambridge Day.

What they’re saying: “I believe that if Hernan doesn’t get to come home, it has little to do with the rights or whether he deserves to be an American and more to do with the U.S. deciding who it likes,” Frank Pinto, Perlera Gonzalez’s cousin, told the crowd Monday morning.

The other side: The DHS official said any claims of racial profiling are “categorically false.”

  • “What makes someone a target of ICE is that they are in our country illegally—not their skin color,” the official said. “DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence.”

What we’re watching: A federal judge will have to decide whether Elias Escobar’s lawsuit can move forward and if he can continue to pursue his immigration application.

https://www.axios.com/local/boston/2025/09/22/ice-arrests-malden-somerville

Kansas City Star: Trump Withdraws National Guard Threat Amid Defiance

President Donald Trump has threatened to deploy the National Guard to Chicago amid Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s objections, pointing to Washington and Memphis as examples of federal intervention. Critics argue the move would mark an effort of federal overreach into state authority, while Republicans have argued it could help curb violent crime. Trump has withdrawn his plans to deploy the National Guard to Chicago, at least for the immediate future.

Trump said, “So I’m going to go to Chicago early against Pritzker. Pritzker is nothing. If Pritzker was smart, he’d say, ‘Please come in.’ … If they lose less than six or seven people a week with murder, they’re doing a great job in their opinion.”

Pritzker called Trump’s remarks inconsistent and not credible, warning that a deployment without state consent would face immediate legal challenges. Pritzker said, “That you can’t take anything that he says seriously from one day to the next.”

Pritzker added, “He’s attacking verbally, sometimes he attacks, sending his agents in, sometimes he forgets. I think he might be suffering from some dementia. The next day, he’ll wake up on the other side of the bed and stop talking about Chicago.”

Pritzker argued “Operation Midwest Blitz” could justify broader federal action and said the enforcement posture is likely to provoke confrontations. Legal limits may restrict deployment, as a federal judge in San Francisco ruled a June Los Angeles deployment violated the Posse Comitatus Act.

Trump said, “Chicago is a death trap and I’m going to make it just like I did with D.C., just like I’ll do with Memphis.”

Civil liberties groups criticized the Memphis operation as overreach and regressive policing. The White House has touted the move as a measure to reduce violent crime.

American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee said, “This latest step makes clear that the Trump administration is claiming a sweeping mandate to patrol, arrest and detain people in Memphis, and will bring back the same failed policing tactics that caused widespread constitutional violations for decades.”

Pritzker said, “The harder the ICE agents come in, the more people want to intervene and step in the way of them. And when that happens, and when there’s any kind of, well, touching or engagement with those ICE agents that involves actual potential battery, well, that’ll be the excuse.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-withdraws-national-guard-threat-amid-defiance/ss-AA1N5efl

Independent: Fruit vendor arrested by border patrol outside Gavin Newsom event speaks out after six weeks in ICE prison

Strawberry delivery driver released on bond after abrupt arrest as agents patrolled governor’s event

Angel Rodrigo Minguela Palacios was unloading boxes of strawberries during his final delivery in Los Angeles when a band of masked Border Patrol agents surrounded him and asked for his identification.

Minguela had unwittingly entered a political minefield on August 14 outside the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo, where California Governor Gavin Newsom was addressing a crowd about his plans to fight back against a Republican-led gerrymandering campaign to maintain control of Congress.

Federal agents deployed by Donald Trump’s administration were patrolling the street directly in front of the building.

The timing of the spectacle drew immediate scrutiny and backlash, with the governor speaking out in the middle of his remarks to condemn what was happening just outside the event. “You think it’s coincidental?” he said.

Minguela, 48, was released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody last week after nearly two months inside a facility he described as a “prison” with lights on at all hours of the day, no beds and only a concrete floor to sleep on.

Detainees received little food, and the conditions were so bleak that some of the men inside volunteered to self-deport rather, he told CBS News.

“Those days were the hardest,” Minguela told The Los Angeles Times. “My first day there on the floor, I cried. It doesn’t matter that you’re men, it doesn’t matter your age. There, men cried.”

Minguela, who is undocumented, has lived in the United States for more than a decade after entering the country from Mexico on a tourist visa. He overstayed his visa after fleeing violence in the Mexican state of Coahuila, where he had been kidnapped twice and stabbed by people trying to steal money from ATMs he was servicing, according to The Times.

He does not have a criminal record.

Minguela was released on bond and is equipped with an ankle monitor as an immigration judge determines next steps in his case.

A spokesperson for Homeland Security said he “was arrested for breaking our country’s laws by overstaying his visa” but remains unclear why he was targeted for arrest.

Minguela had overstayed a tourist visa after fleeing the Mexican state of Coahuila in 2015 because of violence he faced there, his partner said. She said he had worked servicing ATMs there, was kidnapped twice and at one point was stabbed by people intent on stealing the money. After his employers cut staff, she said, he lost his job, helping drive his decision to leave.

On August 14, Minguela left his partner and three children — ages 15, 12 and six — while they were still asleep as he prepared for his daily delivery route at 2 a.m. He had worked for the same produce delivery company for eight years and never missed a day.

Minguela was unloading several boxes of strawberries and a box of apples when he noticed a group of masked Border Patrol agents roaming the area surrounding Newsom’s event.

Video from the scene shows the agents passing his van then doubling back and looking inside to find Minguela. He presented a red “know your rights” card from his wallet and handed it to an agent.

“This is of no use to me,” he said, according to The Times. Agents then asked him his name, nationality and immigration paperwork before leading him away in handcuffs.

“Immigration has already caught me,” Minguela wrote in text messages to his partner. “Don’t worry. God will help us a lot.”

U.S. Border Patrol El Centro Sector Chief Gregory Bovino was observing the arrest. He turned to the officers and shouted out “well done” moments before speaking with reporters who were filming the scene.

“We’re here making Los Angeles a safer place since we don’t have politicians that will do that,” Border Patrol El Centro Sector Chief Gregory Bovino told FOX 11. “We do that ourselves, so that’s why we’re here today.”

Asked whether he had a message for Newsom, who was speaking roughly 100 feet away, Bovino said he wasn’t aware where the governor was.

“I think it’s pretty sick and pathetic,” Newsom said of the arrest.

“They chose the time, manner, and place to send their district director outside right when we’re about to have this press conference,” he said. “That’s everything you know about Donald Trump’s America … about the authoritarian tendencies of the president.”

Minguela believes he was targeted for his appearance.

Immigration raids throughout the Los Angeles area in June sparked massive protests demanding the Trump administration withdraw ICE and federal agents from patrolling immigrant communities.

In response, Trump federalized National Guard troops and sent in hundreds of Marines despite objections from Democratic city and state officials.

A federal judge determined the administration had illegally deployed the Guard as part of an apparent nationwide effort to create “a national police force with the president as its chief.”

The Supreme Court also recently overturned an injunction that blocked federal agents from carrying out sweeps in southern California after a judge determined they were indiscriminately targeting people based on race and whether they spoke Spanish, among other factors.

The court’s opinion drew a forceful rebuke from liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the first Hispanic justice on the bench, who accused the conservative justices of ignoring the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unlawful searches and seizures

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job,” she wrote in a dissenting opinion.

“The Fourth Amendment protects every individual’s constitutional right to be “free from arbitrary interference by law officers,’” she added. “After today, that may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/gavin-newsom-los-angeles-ice-arrest-border-patrol-b2831503.html

Fox Business: Newt Gingrich: This country is sliding into a pro-Chinese, communist dictatorship

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich defines the ‘real distinction’ in Erika Kirk’s remarks at Charlie’s memorial and warns which country is ‘sliding’ into a dictatorship on ‘Kudlow.’ 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/newt-gingrich-this-country-is-sliding-into-a-pro-chinese-communist-dictatorship/vi-AA1N6d24

Newsweek: Elena Kagan warns Supreme Court “overriding” Congress to give Trump a win

ustice Elena Kagan warned Monday that the Supreme Court is “overriding” Congress to hand President Donald Trump sweeping new powers over independent agencies.

Her dissent came after the court, in a 6-3 decision, allowed Trump to fire Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter while the justices consider whether to overturn a 90-year-old precedent limiting presidential removals.

The conservative majority offered no explanation, as is typical on its emergency docket, but signaled a willingness to revisit the landmark 1935 Humphrey’s Executor ruling.

Kagan, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, said the court has repeatedly cleared firings that Congress explicitly prohibited, thereby shifting control of key regulatory agencies into the president’s hands.

“Congress, as everyone agrees, prohibited each of those presidential removals,” Kagan wrote. “Yet the majority, stay order by stay order, has handed full control of all those agencies to the President.”

Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Monday afternoon.

Why It Matters

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly faced decisions regarding Trump’s use of his powers since his return to the White House in January. Cases have included attempts to fire large swaths of the federal government workforce, as well as changes to immigration policy and cuts to emergency relief funding, with arguments that it is Congress, not the president, that holds such powers.

What To Know

Monday’s decision is the latest high-profile firing the court has allowed in recent months, signaling the conservative majority is poised to overturn or narrow a 1935 Supreme Court decision that found commissioners can only be removed for misconduct or neglect of duty.

The justices are expected to hear arguments in December over whether to overturn a 90-year-old ruling known as Humphrey’s Executor.

In that case, the court sided with another FTC commissioner who had been fired by Franklin D. Roosevelt as the president worked to implement the New Deal. The justices unanimously found that commissioners can be removed only for misconduct or neglect of duty.

That 1935 decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination and public airwaves. However, it has long rankled conservative legal theorists, who argue that such agencies should answer to the president.

The Justice Department argues that Trump can fire board members for any reason as he seeks to implement his agenda. However, Slaughter’s attorneys argue that regulatory decisions will be influenced more by politics than by the expertise of board members if the president can fire congressionally confirmed board members at will.

“If the President is to be given new powers Congress has expressly and repeatedly refused to give him, that decision should come from the people’s elected representatives,” they argued.

The court will hear arguments unusually early in the process, before the case has fully worked its way through lower courts.

The court rejected a push from two other board members of independent agencies who had asked the justices to also hear their cases if they took up the Slaughter case: Gwynne Wilcox, of the National Labor Relations Board, and Cathy Harris, of the Merit Systems Protection Board.

The FTC is a regulator enforcing consumer protection measures and antitrust legislation. The NLRB investigates unfair labor practices and oversees union elections, while the MSPB reviews disputes from federal workers.

What People Are Saying

Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote: “The President and the government suffer irreparable harm when courts transfer even some of that executive power to officers beyond the President’s control.”

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, in her dissent: “The majority may be raring to take that action, as its grant of certiorari before judgment suggests. But until the deed is done, Humphrey’s controls, and prevents the majority from giving the President the unlimited removal power Congress denied him.”

Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat, in an amicus brief filed in Trump v. Slaughter“Because the President’s limited authority to temporarily withhold funds proposed for rescission under the ICA does not permit the President to withhold those funds through their date of expiration without action from Congress, the district court’s injunction imposes no greater burden on the government than already exists under that law. The stakes for Congress and the public, however, are high. The fiscal year ends on September 30, less than three weeks from today.”

What Happens Next

The court has already allowed the president to fire all three board members for now. The court has suggested, however, that the president’s power to fire may have limits at the Federal Reserve, a prospect that is expected to be tested in the case of fired Fed Governor Lisa Cook.

https://www.newsweek.com/kagan-supreme-court-congress-trump-win-ftc-2133934

Buzz60: Walmart Raises Prices By 45% In 30 Days Due To ‘Magnitude Of The Tariffs’

Something unusual is happening at Walmart. This week, shoppers and workers are spotting big price hikes on toys, groceries, and everyday items.

Some prices are rising by nearly half in just 30 days. People are sharing photos of the new tags online. What’s driving these changes? The answer links back to tariffs announced in Washington, now showing up on America’s store shelves.

Across Walmart locations in the U.S., employees and customers are noticing sharp jumps. Fresh stickers are going up with higher numbers, and shoppers are posting side-by-side photos of old and new tags to show how quickly things have changed.

Much of the first buzz came from Reddit, where Walmart staff uploaded pictures of price changes. These posts quickly spread, giving the public a closer look at how steeply prices are moving in real time.

One of the clearest examples came from sporting goods. A left-handed fishing reel rose from $57.37 in April to $83.26 in May. That’s a 45 percent jump within weeks: proof of just how much tariffs can push prices.

The toy aisle tells a similar story. A Jurassic World T. rex climbed from $39.92 on April 27 to $55 by May 21. A Baby Born doll that cost under $35 in March was nearly $50 two months later. Parents are feeling the pinch.

Walmart makes about 60 percent of its U.S. sales from groceries. Even small increases here can affect millions of families. Cocoa powder, for example, jumped from $3.44 in 2024 to $6.18 in 2025, showing that food costs are not immune.

The main reason is tariffs. In April, President Donald Trump announced a 10 percent tax on imports. Vendors passed these costs on to Walmart, and Walmart says it can’t absorb them all without raising prices for shoppers.

Doug McMillon, Walmart’s CEO, put it simply: “We’ll keep prices as low as possible, but given the magnitude of the tariffs, we can’t take on all the pressure.” For a low-margin retailer, the math leaves little choice.

Walmart’s size means these changes affect huge numbers of people. As of July 31, 2025, Walmart runs 5,206 stores in the U.S., including 4,606 Walmart locations and 600 Sam’s Clubs. When Walmart prices shift, millions of households notice.

Walmart makes most of its money by selling lots of goods at low prices. Its thin profit margins mean that even small increases in supply costs show up quickly at checkout. Tariffs hit this model directly.

Tariffs were announced in April. By May, Walmart was already raising prices. That short gap shows how quickly higher import costs move from global trade decisions to store shelves.

Walmart isn’t alone. Many U.S. companies are also adjusting prices upward. The toy industry has warned that nearly every retailer relying on Chinese imports will feel the strain.

Most toys sold in the U.S. are made in China. That means nearly every part of the toy supply chain now costs more. With no way to absorb those costs, stores pass them to parents.

When asked about toy prices, Trump downplayed concerns: “Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls.” His remark fueled debate about whether tariffs really protect U.S. jobs… or mainly just raise costs for families.

Online, shoppers are voicing anger. Many share receipts or photos showing items marked up by double digits in a matter of weeks. Some say they’re cutting back or shopping elsewhere, but most note Walmart has few low-cost rivals.

CFO John David Rainey told reporters that Walmart’s strategy remains strong, but protecting profits while prices rise is a challenge. For now, the company is focused on managing growth and costs at the same time.

Economists warn that if tariffs continue, more categories, from electronics to clothing—could rise in price. Long-term pressure may shift how families spend and how stores compete.

For the millions who shop Walmart weekly, a 30 to 40 percent increase on basics adds up fast. Families already stretched by inflation say they feel these hikes directly in their budgets.

With prices climbing, shoppers and experts are calling for more clear labeling about why costs are rising. Some want receipts or shelf tags to show when tariffs, not just supply shortages, are driving increases.

For now, Walmart is passing costs along as tariffs take hold. Whether things settle depends on trade policy in the months ahead.

What started as a government decision is now being felt in the everyday purchases of millions of Americans.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/walmart-raises-prices-by-45-in-30-days-due-to-magnitude-of-the-tariffs/ss-AA1N41OE

Axios: Trump promotes unproven vaccine theories, then praises shots

Just weeks after President Trump said “pure and simple,” vaccines work, he floated a slew of unproven theories linking vaccines to autism, before praising shots in a wide-ranging press conference on Monday.

Why it matters: Trump’s back and forth on vaccines amid consistent science finding them effective risks confusing the public and undermining trust in U.S. medical professionals.

Context: Trump made the remarks during a briefing on autism rates, where he and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revived a contentious, unproven debate that links autism to acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol.

What he’s saying: “There are certain groups of people that don’t take vaccines and don’t take any pills, that have no autism,” Trump said during a Monday evening press conference at the White House.

  • He repeated the myth that Amish communities have “essentially no autism” and said neither does Cuba, citing “a rumor — and I don’t know if it’s so or not —” that the island nation doesn’t have Tylenol “because they don’t have the money” for the drug.
  • The president specifically noted that Americans should be wary of vaccines that include Thimerosal, a mercury-containing compound sometimes used as a preservative in vaccines.

Reality check: While research has found that some Amish people are likely under-vaccinated due to vaccine hesitancy, studies show that some Amish children do have autism.

  • report updated by the Food and Drug administration earlier this year found that a “robust body of peer-reviewed scientific studies” have concluded that Thimerosal is perfectly safe in vaccines.

Of note: At the end of the briefing, the president reversed course, saying that he’s a “big believer” in vaccines because he has “seen how great” and “incredible” they can be.

  • Trump said he supports giving kids vaccines to protect against the measles, mumps, rubella and varicella viruses, but added that he disproves of giving them the MMRV vaccine, the combined shot that treats them all.
  • Several studies have found no link between MMR vaccination and autism, per a National Institutes of Health post that notes: “Despite strong evidence of its safety, some parents are still hesitant to accept MMR vaccination of their children. Decreasing acceptance of MMR vaccination has led to outbreaks or resurgence of measles.”
  • Some doctors already provide separate vaccines for children, but also offer the combined vaccine for parents who wish to reduce the amount of shots their kids must take.

Zoom out: Kennedy’s handpicked vaccine recommendation board voted to limit the availability of the combined shots last week, drawing criticism from public health officials.

Health and Human Services referred Axios to the White House for comment, which did not immediately respond to a Monday evening email request.

https://www.axios.com/2025/09/23/trump-promotes-unproven-vaccine-theories-then-praises-shots