Newsweek: Tucker Carlson urges “civil disobedience” if Trump DOJ targets hate speech

Tucker Carlson warned in a special episode of his show on Tuesday that “civil disobedience” could erupt should the Trump administration and other “bad actors” use Charlie Kirk’s death as a means to attack free speech.

Why It Matters

Kirk, 31, co-founder and executive director of the national conservative organization Turning Point USA, was fatally shot September 10 during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Immediately following his death, President Donald Trump ordered flags to be at half-staff, and in the days since, some conservatives have openly called for stricter free-speech barriers, including on college campuses.

U.S. Attorney General Pam [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi said and later defended the Department of Justice‘s intent to crack down on “hate speech” nationwide, saying threats of violence are federal crimes under the U.S. Constitution. [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi’s remarks have been met with vitriol from people on both sides of the political aisle, with many quoting Kirk’s own words and sentiments regarding the sanctity of free speech.

What To Know

Carlson opened Wednesday’s episode of The Tucker Carlson Show, a tribute to Kirk called “America After Charlie Kirk,” featuring conservative and liberal guests, including Megyn Kelly and Cenk Uygur, with a near 35-minute introduction about the former conservative commentator’s legacy and how free speech is essentially more vital than ever.

“Consider what it means if you don’t respect free speech, which is another way of saying free conscience—the right of other people to make up their own minds about the basic questions of what is right or wrong, and to express their views on those issues,” Carlson said.

“If you don’t respect the right of other people to do that, and if you take steps to prevent them from doing that, what are you really saying? You’re saying, “I don’t think you have a soul. You’re a meat puppet I can control. I think you’re an animal, maybe a sub-animal. You’re a slave.'”

Carlson then invoked [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi into the argument, referencing her recent remarks on free speech and so-called hate speech in the wake of Kirk’s murder.

Kirk would not have objected to anything more than Bondi’s words of purported defense of free speech, Carlson said, adding that perhaps she “didn’t think it through and was not attempting to desecrate the memory of the person she was purporting to celebrate.

“You hope Charlie Kirk’s death won’t be used by a group we now call bad actors to create a society that was the opposite of the one he worked to build,” Carlson said. “You hope that! You hope a year from now, the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his murder won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country.

“And trust me…if that does happen, there is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that—ever, and there never will be. Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think, there is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul.”

Jimmy Kimmel Suspension

On Wednesday, ABC announced it had suspended Jimmy Kimmel Live! indefinitely following backlash over comments host Jimmy Kimmel made about Kirk.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said on air.

Following Kirk’s death, Kimmel called the murder “senseless,” and the longtime talk show host had also issued a message of love to Kirk’s family in an Instagram post.

Kimmel’s suspension came hours after FCC Chairman Brendan Carr publicly criticized Kimmel’s remarks and suggested regulatory consequences. The move also coincides with Nexstar Media Group’s pending $6.2 billion merger with Tegna, which is subject to FCC approval—raising questions about whether corporate and regulatory pressures influenced the network’s response.

In the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, some conservatives have praised the firing of individuals from their respective jobs after making comments online that were deemed in poor taste.

Other conservatives have lauded Kirk and advocated for statues to be erected in his honor.

What People Are Saying

Ryan McCormick, managing partner at New York-based Goldman McCormick public relations, told Newsweek: “The abrupt termination of Jimmy Kimmel’s show seems perplexing considering how valuable it had been to ABC. According to TVREV, it ranked as the network’s 10th best ad earner, delivering 11.8 billion national TV ad impressions.

“For something like this to happen, it would likely seem that the legal implications of Kimmel’s controversial statements must either be substantial, the reputational fallout from Kimmel’s recent comments was too severe to contain, or ABC had been planning to do this all along but was waiting for the right moment. From a PR perspective, it seems the die was cast for this day to come when Kimmel made his program politically polarizing (permanently narrowing the audience size).”

New York trial attorney Nicole Brenecki told Newsweek: “If a network parts ways with a host because of something they said, it’s typically a business or contractual decision, not a First Amendment violation. The U.S. Constitution protects individuals from government censorship, but private companies have their own standards and are generally free to make programming choices—even if those choices spark public debate about free expression.”

What Happens Next

One week after Kirk’s shooting and death, tensions remain high and conversation continues surrounding free speech and political violence.

https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-jimmy-kimmel-abc-trump-free-speech-2131881

Alternet: ‘Undisputed idiot king’: Former NBC journalist calls Eric Trump ‘the epitome of stupidity’

First Son Eric Trump’s false claim that political violence is exclusively carried out by the American left prompted Emmy-winning journalist David Shuster to declare that President Donald Trump’s second-oldest son was the “undisputed idiot king” and “a grotesque epitome of stupidity so profound he renders the rest of his family — already a display of moral and cognitive deformities that would confound Sigmund Freud — almost respectable by comparison.”

After MAGA activist Charlie Kirk was killed by a lone gunman on a Utah college campus last week, Eric Trump recently joined a far-right podcast to lay blame for Kirk’s murder at the feet of the left. This is despite the alleged shooter’s staunch Republican family, non-partisan voter registration status and his own friends saying he never discussed politics.

“The bullets are only flying one way,” Eric Trump told podcast host Will Cain. “Listen, there’s fringe on both sides, 100%, but like, I don’t know … These people have tried to do everything they could to take us out of the game.”

In a Tuesday post to his Substack, Shuster — who is a veteran of NBC, CNN and Fox News — called Eric “the dumbest Trump, which is saying something.” He went on to say that Trump’s adult son saying that the left was the only side carrying political violence was “the intellectual equivalent of spraying manure in your own eyes while insisting it is perfume.”

“In this single sentence, Eric demonstrated the mental agility of a cornered sloth,” Shuster wrote. “And the selective memory of a dung beetle rolling it’s own feculent ball across the lawn of public discourse.”

Shuster pointed out that Eric Trump glossed over high-profile recent instances of right-wing violence, like the June murder of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman (D) and her husband Mark — in which the alleged killer also wounded Democratic state senator Jon Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. Shuster also reminded his readers that a man angry about vaccines fired on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, and killed the police officer who confronted him. The former MSNBC host also didn’t hold back in criticizing Eric Trump from using Kirk’s murder to promote his new book.

“Eric was baffled when critics said the pledge looked opportunistic. Maybe the word itself baffled Eric since ‘opportunistic’ has five syllables,” Shuster wrote. “…He is the family’s apex of ignorance. The pinnacle of self-important incompetence. The organism whose very existence makes the rest of the Trump clan’s failings appear almost tolerable.”

https://www.alternet.org/eric-trump-stupidity

Alternet: ‘This is insane’: Conservatives demand Trump official’s removal over ‘hate speech’ blunder

The Guardian reports prominent conservatives are attacking U.S. Attorney General Pam [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi for pledging to “absolutely target” people who use “hate speech” in the wake of the killing of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk.

[“Bimbo #3”] Bondi declared on a podcast hosted by Katie Miller, the wife of the right-wing White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, that there is “free speech and then there’s hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society”.

The U.S. attorney also went so far as to threaten to prosecute an Office Depot employee who allegedly refused to print flyers for a vigil for Kirk.

But legal experts and conservative pundits are condemning the comments because there is no “hate speech” exception in the First Amendment right to speech, so targeting people for frank or even hurtful comments is unconstitutional.

“Get rid of her. Today. This is insane. Conservatives have fought for decades for the right to refuse service to anyone. We won that fight. Now Pam [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi wants to roll it all back for no reason,” said conservative pundit Matt Walsh posting on X

Conservative commentator Erick Erickson, also writing on X, said: “Our Attorney General is apparently a moron. ‘There’s free speech and then there is hate speech.’ No ma’am. That is not the law.”

Savanah Hernandez, a commentator with Turning Point, described [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi’s statement as the “most destructive phrase that has ever been uttered … She needs to be removed as attorney general now.”

Heidi Kitrosser, a Northwestern University law professor, told the Guardian that [“Bimbo #3”] Bondi’s talk of targeting people who use “hate speech” is not legal because the “first amendment creates very, very strong protections from punishment for speech that’s offensive or for speech with which people disagree.”

“The bar for punishing speech based on content, and especially based on viewpoint, is extremely, extremely high,” Kitrosser said.

What else would you expect from a brainless bimbo?

https://www.alternet.org/pam-bondi-free-speech

Alternet: ‘Sided with Democrats’: Nancy Mace melts down at 4 Republicans who sank her censure motion

“Instead of targeting Rep. Omar, Republican and Democratic leaders should consider holding accountable bigots like Rep. Randy Fine and Rep. Brian Mast, and even Rep. Mace herself – who in recent days said Rep. Omar should go back to Somalia and told a Jewish colleague they should see a plastic surgeon for their nose,” the statement read.

An effort by Rep. Nancy Mace (R‑S.C.) to censure Rep. Ilhan Omar (D‑Minn.) failed in the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday night.

The resolution, which was introduced in response to Omar reposting a video and making remarks related to right-wing activist Charlie Kirk’s murder last week, was tabled by a vote of 214‑213. Four Republicans joined all Democrats in opposing the resolution.

The Republicans who opposed the resolution were Reps. Cory Mills (R-Fla.), Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.), Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) and Mike Flood (R-Neb.)

If passed, the resolution would have formally censured Omar and removed her from some committee assignments.

Following the failure of her censure motion, Mace took to social media to attack her Republican colleagues who opposed the move.

In a series of post on the social platform X, she wrote: “4 Republicans sold out tonight. They sided with Democrats to protect Ilhan Omar. A woman who mocked the assassination of an innocent American husband and father.”

She added: “In 210 Democrats and 4 Republicans (Mike Flood, Jeff Hurd, Tom McClintock, and Cory Mills) just sided with Ilhan Omar over Charlie Kirk. They voted to shield a woman who mocked the cold-blooded assassination of Charlie Kirk… A woman who belittled his grieving family…”

“They showed us exactly who they are. Never forget it,” Mace wrote.

Meanwhile, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization in the U.S., welcomed the development.

In a statement released to media, it declared the outcome “a victory against racism and political repression,” but added that “the fight is not over.”

“Rep. Mace and her allies may seek to bring the measure back to the floor in the future. Earlier today, CAIR sent a formal letter to all members of the House urging them to oppose the resolution, which falsely accused Rep. Omar of celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk – despite her repeatedly condemning his murder and offering sympathy to his family,” CAIR stated.

“Instead of targeting Rep. Omar, Republican and Democratic leaders should consider holding accountable bigots like Rep. Randy Fine and Rep. Brian Mast, and even Rep. Mace herself – who in recent days said Rep. Omar should go back to Somalia and told a Jewish colleague they should see a plastic surgeon for their nose,” the statement read.

https://www.alternet.org/nancy-mace-ilhan-omar

Guardian: US justice department removes study finding far-right extremists commit ‘far more’ violence

Report finding rightwing extremists have killed more Americans than other domestic terrorist groups vanished from DoJ website

The US justice department has scrubbed a study from its website concluding that far-right extremists have killed far more Americans than any other domestic terrorist group, just days after a gunman fatally shot the prominent conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

The report, now archived, titled What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism, vanished from the Department of Justice website between 11 and 12 September, according to Jason Paladino, an independent investigative reporter who first wrote the story. Kirk, the 31-year-old Turning Point USA founder and Trump ally, was gunned down while speaking at Utah Valley University on 10 September.

The vanished study opened with: “Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.”

Tyler Robinson, 22, has been charged with Kirk’s murder and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. In the aftermath of the shooting, Donald Trump and other Republican leaders have blamed “radical left” elements for the attack.

The National Institute of Justice study, which was based on research spanning three decades, represented one of the most comprehensive government assessments of domestic terrorism patterns. It found that “militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States” and that “the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism”.

Where the report once appeared, the justice department wrote it was “reviewing its websites and materials in accordance with recent executive orders”, according to 404Media, though the page is now unavailable.

But the findings align with independent research from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, which analyzed 893 terrorist plots between 1994 and 2020. That study concluded: “Rightwing attacks and plots account for the majority of all terrorist incidents in the United States since 1994.”

In congressional testimony in 2023, Heidi Beirich, the executive vice-president of Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, told lawmakers as an expert witness that “data on acts of political violence clearly shows that it is the far right that is driving terrorism in the US, including targeting and, in certain cases, murdering law enforcement”.

“That is not to say there is no violence from far-left actors,” she continued, “it is just simply not on the scale or as deadly as what is coming from far-right actors.”

Kirk had built Turning Point USA into a major conservative youth organization and spoke at last year’s Republican national convention. He was addressing students when he was shot.

The justice department has not responded to requests for comment about the study’s removal.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/17/justice-department-study-far-right-extremist-violence


Another article:

404 Media: DOJ Deletes Study Showing Domestic Terrorists Are Most Often Right Wing

Following Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the Trump administration’s promise to go after the “radical left” a study showing most domestic terrosim is far-right was disappeared. Attorney General Pam Bondi. Image: DOJ The Department of Justice has removed a study showing that white supremacist and far-right violence “continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism” in the United States. 

The study, which was conducted by the National Institute of Justice and hosted on a DOJ website was available there at least until September 12, 2025, according to an archive of the page saved by the Wayback Machine. Daniel Malmer, a PhD student studying online extremism at UNC-Chapel Hill, first noticed the paper was deleted.

“The Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs is currently reviewing its websites and materials in accordance with recent Executive Orders and related guidance,” reads a message on the page where the study was formerly hosted. “During this review, some pages and publications will be unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.”

https://www.404media.co/doj-deletes-study-showing-domestic-terrorists-are-most-often-right-wing

Daily Mail: Fatima Payman declares that Charlie Kirk was an ‘awful person’ after he was assassinated

Senator Fatima Payman has described Charlie Kirk as an ‘awful person’ in a video in which she appears to make light of his assassination. 

Kirk, a 31-year-old father of two and controversial conservative commentator, was shot in the neck last week during a rally at Utah Valley University. He died a short time later.

The independent senator for WA responded to Kirk’s death in a live TikTok video, recorded at some point over the last week.

‘What do I think about Charlie Kirk and obviously his assassination?’, she told her nearly 195,000 followers. 

‘I think he was a pretty awful person and he doesn’t deserve all the recognition he’s getting.’

She added: ‘It would have been best to not have him assassinated and for him to remain a footnote in the Trumpian era of the United States. 

‘But yeah, so, not cool. Yeah, Charlie Kirk got shot and he’s RIP – whatever you want RIP to stand for! Some people will say it’s not peace. Fill in the blanks people, fill in the blanks.’

Her video has received swift condemnation, with One Nation Leader – and longtime Payman enemy – Pauline Hanson claiming it exposes her ‘radical leftist ideology’.

‘Fatima Payman mocking the death of Charlie Kirk isn’t just vile, it’s revealing,’ Senator Hanson said. 

‘When the mask slips, this is what the left shows us: no compassion, no decency, only contempt. And yet they lecture the rest of us about unity and respect. 

‘Remember this moment the next time anyone from the left starts lecturing from atop their moral high horse.’

A spokesperson for Senator Payman did not reveal what other possible meaning of ‘RIP’ she was referring to.  

‘Senator Payman condemns all forms of political violence, and the level of violence we are seeing in the United States is frightening,’ the spokesperson added. 

‘The Senator extends her sympathies to Charlie Kirk’s young family. For them, this is a terrible tragedy, and they deserve compassion in their grief.’

The spokesperson insisted that Senator Payman ‘notes that since Mr Kirk’s death, there has been a wave of commentary revisiting his statements and public positions.

‘The Senator will not engage in attempts to recast or glorify Mr Kirk’s record. Her focus remains on condemning violence, supporting victims of hate speech, and standing for respectful, democratic debate,’ the spokesperson added. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15106055/Fatima-Payman-Charlie-Kirk-awful-person.html

MSNBC: ‘So absurd’: Chris Hayes blasts MAGA crackdown on free speech

“The Trump administration is announcing their intention—loud and clear—that they want to use every tool of the state at their disposal to suppress domestic political dissent,” says Chris Hayes. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/so-absurd-chris-hayes-blasts-maga-crackdown-on-free-speech/vi-AA1MH5av

HuffPost: Mike Johnson’s ‘Grade School’ Plea Gets A Red Mark For Hypocrisy Online

The House speaker talked about politicians turning down the “temperature and the violent rhetoric,” and critics said the same scathing thing.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) was slammed for hypocrisy after he argued that political leaders should not use violent rhetoric against their opponents, while conveniently forgetting that President Donald Trump does it all the time.

Johnson on Tuesday said the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk had proven the need for political leaders of all stripes to “turn down the temperature and the violent rhetoric.”

It’s “not helpful,” he said.

“Leaders cannot call their political opponents ‘Nazis’ and ‘fascists’ and ‘enemies of the state’ because they disagree with their policy priorities. I mean, this is something we should have learned in grade school,” Johnson told reporters. “This type of language spurs on depraved people, deranged people, who take that as a cue and this tragic phenomenon played out this week in Utah.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-johnson-comment-reminder_n_68ca808ae4b0ce33ec38cf3f

MSNBC: Maddow Blog | FBI’s Kash Patel faces criticisms from within the Trump administration

The FBI director is facing all kinds of criticisms, including some from within the bureau that Patel ostensibly leads.

Kash Patel’s difficulties at the FBI certainly didn’t start last week, but his handling of Charlie Kirk’s shooting death hasn’t exactly helped the bureau’s hapless director.

On Wednesday afternoon, for example, Patel suggested via social media that Kirk’s shooter had been captured. That wasn’t just wrong, it also had the potential to undermine the investigation: People might’ve been discouraged from calling in tips after they saw the FBI director told the public that the suspect was no longer at large.

Patel was forced to walk back his mistake soon after, but the incident quickly led to criticisms from both the left and the right. Just as notable, however, were relevant details that soon followed. NBC News reported on Friday:

FBI Director Kash Patel was dining at Rao’s in New York on Wednesday night after the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, two sources familiar with his whereabouts told NBC News. Patel had posted on X at 6:21 p.m. ET that the ‘subject’ in Kirk’s killing was ‘in custody.’ Rao’s, a well-known restaurant that is notoriously tough to get into, opens at 7 p.m. Then, at 7:59 p.m., Patel posted a follow-up post that the ‘subject in custody has been released after an interrogation by law enforcement.’

The reporting on his whereabouts certainly didn’t make Patel look any better, but the details also suggest that there were people within the FBI who were eager to alert the public to the embarrassing details of Patel’s mistake.

Around the same time, a current law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity told NBC News that the “horrific event” of Kirk’s killing showcased Patel’s “public inability to meet the moment as a leader.”

Two days later, Fox News published a report with a headline that said “knives are out” for Patel — a Shakespearean metaphor suggesting that at least some of the director’s opponents are coming for him from within the FBI. The same report quoted one insider who added that the White House, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche “have no confidence in Kash.”

That reporting has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, and the president himself continues to offer public praise for the FBI director.

Yet, as the ground beneath Patel’s feet appears less certain, former Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is poised to be sworn in as the FBI’s first co-deputy director, a move that continues to be bizarre (since the FBI already has a deputy director in former podcast personality Dan Bongino) and that probably won’t help quiet the whispers about Patel’s future.

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/fbis-kash-patel-faces-criticisms-trump-administration-rcna231322

Mediaite: The Atlantic’s Jemele Hill Says She’s ‘Insulted’ That Charlie Kirk’s ‘White Supremacist’ Beliefs Are Being Reduced to a ‘Difference of Opinion’

The Atlantic’s Jemele Hill blasted conservative media star Charlie Kirk as a white supremacist whose “influence was dangerous” and said the outpouring of support for Kirk, just days after he was murdered, was insulting.

Hill made those scathing remarks, among others, on a special live episode of her Spolitics podcast on Friday. Several parts of Hill’s  rant — in which she said she was fighting the “counter narrative” forming about Kirk by pointing out his “entire purpose” was making non-whites feel inferior — were clipped and shared to X over the weekend.

“I’m tired of white supremacist beliefs being considered a difference of opinion,” Hill declared at one point. “Im really sick of that!”

At another point, Hill said she was “paying attention to how people are talking about and memorializing Charlie Kirk. I’m insulted by the fact that they think his beliefs are just about a difference of opinion.” Kirk, she claimed, felt “because you’re Black then you don’t deserve the same treatment,” which she said was a “different conversation,” not just a different view.

Hill’s claims are contradicted by several statements made by Kirk, including one video from the Turning Points USA YouTube account where Kirk said he “repudiates” white supremacy.

At other points in her rant, the ex-ESPN star said examples of Kirk’s racism include him having the audacity to question the “brain processing of brilliant minds” like Joy Reid and Ketanji Brown Jackson. 

Ultimately, Kirk “made a living off questioning the humanity and dignity” of non-whites, Reid said, and that is why he does not deserve the outpouring of support he has received. The 31-year-old influencer, who helped play a critical role in helping President Donald Trump win millions of young voters, was shot and killed during a questions-and-answers session at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday.

Kirk’s suspected assassin, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, had reportedly told family members recently that he hated Kirk’s conservative views.

You can watch Hill’s full video podcast via YouTube above. The comments mentioned above come around he 22:00 minute mark.