President Donald Trump on Thursday night announced a new batch of tariffs including ones on foreign-made trucks, cabinets, furniture and pharmacuetical products.
The highest tariffs were imposed on pharmacuetical products, which Trump said would be “100%” unless the company is building its plant in the United States.
“‘IS BUILDING’ will be defined as, ‘breaking ground’ and/or ‘under construction,'” Trump posted on Truth Social. “There will, therefore, be no Tariff on these Pharmaceutical Products if construction has started.”
Trump said there will be a 50% tariff on kitchen cabinets, bathroom vanities, and associated products starting Oct. 1, and a 30% tariff on furniture.
“The reason for this is the large scale ‘FLOODING’ of these products into the United States by other outside Countries,” Trump wrote in a separate Truth Social post. “It is a very unfair practice, but we must protect, for national security and other reasons, our manufacturing process.”
The lightest tariffs will be on heavy foreign-made trucks, which will see a 25% tariff starting on Oct. 1.
“Our Great Large Truck Company Manufacturers, such as Peterbilt, Kenworth, Freightliner, Mack Trucks, and others, will be protected from the onslaught of outside interruptions,” Trump wrote in a social media post. “We need our Truckers to be financially healthy and strong, for many reasons, but above all else, for National Security purposes.”
The tariffs come on top of Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs that were imposed on nearly every nation in the world in April. The tariffs were part of a bid to address trade deficits and conditions that he perceived to be unfair to the U.S.
Tag Archives: united states
MSNBC: Judge reinstates South Dakota professor who called Charlie Kirk a ‘hate spreading Nazi’
The art professor “demonstrated that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his First Amendment claim,” a federal judge wrote.
A University of South Dakota art professor can keep his job — for now, at least — despite his private Facebook post in which he called Charlie Kirk “a hate spreading Nazi” after Kirk was fatally shot while speaking at a Utah college.
A judge’s temporary restraining order keeping Phillip Michael Hook in his position while his lawsuit proceeds highlights that at least some employers may have overstepped legally in taking actions against employees for their speech about Kirk, the Trump-allied activist who has been eulogized as a free speech advocate. It also reinforces that Attorney General Pam Bondi was incorrect when she attempted to single out so-called hate speech as something that the First Amendment doesn’t protect.
Explaining her temporary ruling in Hook’s favor Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier reasoned that the professor’s speech “is entitled to First Amendment protection” and that the school failed to produce “any evidence of disruption” in response to Hook’s post. Such evidence wouldn’t necessarily justify his firing, but it would add a layer to the analysis that the Clinton appointee determined she didn’t have to examine here.
Hook wrote in his Sept. 10 post, which he made while at home and not working:
Okay. I don’t give a flying f*** about this Kirk person. Apparently he was a hate spreading Nazi. I wasn’t paying close enough attention to the idiotic right fringe to even know who he was. I’m sorry for his family that he was a hate spreading Nazi and got killed. I’m sure they deserved better. Maybe good people could now enter their lives. But geez, where was all this concern when the politicians in Minnesota were shot? And the school shootings? And Capitol Police? I have no thoughts or prayers for this hate spreading Nazi. A shrug, maybe.
He wrote in a follow-up post that day, while still at home and not working:
Apparently my frustration with the sudden onslaught of coverage concerning a guy shot today led to a post I mow [sic] regret posting. I’m sure many folks fully understood my premise but the simple fact that some were offended, led me to remove the post. I extend this public apology to those who were offended. Om Shanti.
Republican state officials spoke out against the professor and supported his firing. The university told Hook that it intended to fire him and that he would be placed on leave in the meantime. He filed a lawsuit alleging unconstitutional retaliation against core political speech.
Opposing the restraining order in a court filing ahead of Schreier’s ruling, university officials wrote that Hook’s post “angered many people, both internal and external” to the university. They also said that a restraining order is unnecessary because even if Hook succeeds in his claim, he can get reinstatement and back pay.
Schreier nonetheless ordered Hook reinstated through Oct. 8, when the judge will hold a preliminary injunction hearing on the next steps in the case. For now, she wrote, the professor “has demonstrated that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his First Amendment claim.”
Mirror US: ‘Two-thirds’ of detainees brought to Alligator Alcatraz are missing, chilling report finds
More regarding Gulag Noem aka Alligator Alcatraz
According to the report, the whereabouts of nearly two-thirds of the 1,800 men brought to the facility during the month of July could not be determined
Hundreds of the more than 1,800 men brought to the recently constructed South Florida immigration detention center, branded “Alligator Alcatraz,” have disappeared from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) records, according to new reporting from the Miami Herald.
According to the report, the newspaper could not determine the whereabouts of nearly two-thirds of the 1,800 men brought to the facility during the month of July. Around 800 detainees showed no record in ICE’s database, and more than 450 detainees listed no location and were only instructed to “Call ICE for details.”
It is possible that some of the men detailed in the report could still be detained at Alligator Alcatraz, but unlike federal facilities, the Everglades detention center is run by the state of Florida, which does not maintain a searchable database of people detained at the facility. According to the report, they are also often not included in federally maintained databases.
But that alone would not have accounted for all the detainees without records in the federal database, as the facility’s population had declined rapidly by late August, falling below 400 people due to a federal court ruling essentially halting operations at the site.
The outcomes for the hundreds of detainees have become even more important recently, with a federal appeals court overruling the lower court’s decision, allowing the facility to resume normal operations for now while the case proceeds through the courts.
Some of the detainees that were not able to be located by the outlet may have already been deported, despite the internal data obtained by the Herald showing the vast majority of detainees didn’t have final orders of removal from a judge before entering the facility.
Many of those deportations were a result of detainees deciding to abandon their ongoing immigration cases to put an end to their detention at the facility, which human rights organizations have criticised for its abhorrent conditions.
“It became a game of chicken to see who’s going to blink first, to see if the client’s going to say ‘I don’t want to be detained in these conditions, just send me back,'” Miami immigration attorney Alex Solomiany told the Herald.
However, some of the detainees who didn’t want to voluntarily surrender their immigration cases were also deported, even if they had a legal right to remain in the country. One of Solomiany’s clients is a 53-year-old man from Guatemala who has been in the United States since 2001.
According to the Herald, the man was sent to Alligator Alcatraz after being stopped by the Florida Highway Patrol in Palm Beach County.
Solomiany told the Herald that he filed a motion to be released on bond for the Guatemalan man, who worked as a house painter and is married with children. He then attended a scheduled hearing at the Krome Detention Center in Miami on Aug. 1, expecting to see his client. That’s when an attorney for the government told Solomiany his client had accidentally been deported to Guatemala, instead of being transferred to Krome ahead of the hearing, Solomiany told the Herald.
The attorney is now working with ICE to have his client returned to the U.S.

https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/two-thirds-detainees-brought-alligator-1407183
Daily Beast: Trump’s Goons Topple 12-Foot Statue of Him and Epstein
The 12-foot bronze had got a permit from the federal government—but then vanished.

A towering 12-foot statue of President Donald Trump and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein holding hands mysteriously appeared on the Capitol Mall early Tuesday.
By sunrise Wednesday, it had vanished.
The United States Park Police quietly removed the provocative bronze sculpture around 5:30 a.m., according to footage obtained by the Daily Beast.
The removal violates a permit issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) to “The Secret Handshake,” the group that claimed responsibility for the installation. The statue was authorized to remain on display across from the Capitol on 3rd Street, between Madison and Jefferson Avenues, until Sunday at 8 p.m., documents reviewed by the Daily Beast reveal.
The DOI is also required to notify the artists at least 24 hours before the statue is removed for any reason.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-and-epstein-statue-in-dc-vanishes-despite-legal-permit
MySA: Feds: 19-year-old accused of assaulting ICE agent during South Texas raid
The teen faces up to eight years in federal prison and up to a $250,000 fine.
A South Texas man is facing federal criminal charges after officials say he attempted to interfere with a work site raid by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
A federal grand jury indicted Diego Misael Torres, 19, of Peñitas, on one count of assaulting or impeding a federal officer involving physical contact for his alleged conduct during a raid at a construction site late last month in Harlingen, in the Rio Grande Valley. Torres allegedly tried to “remove” an agent as the agent attempted to apprehend a person suspected to be in the United States unlawfully, according to a Justice Department news release.
“On Aug. 27, authorities were conducting a consensual worksite enforcement operation in Harlingen, according to the charges. Upon their arrival, several people allegedly fled from the area,” the news release states. “While authorities attempted to apprehend the illegal alien, Torres allegedly attempted to physically remove a law enforcement officer from that person,” it further reads.
ICE officials announced Torres’ arrest on social media, along with a reminder for civilians to refrain from interfering with immigration agents.
“We will not tolerate actions that obstruct or interfere with our agents as they carry out their lawful duties to protect our communities and enforce federal laws,” said Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) acting Special Agent in Charge Mark Lippa. “Those who attempt to hinder our efforts will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law,” he added.
The work site raid occurred at a subdivision that’s currently under construction in Harlingen, in Cameron County, though officials redacted the precise location in the criminal complaint against Torres.
It remains unclear how many people ICE agents may have apprehended during the operation. Earlier this year, the agency announced dozens of arrests during similar sweeps at construction sites in Brownsville and on South Padre Island. As soon as agents in the Harlingen operation identified themselves as law enforcement, “multiple individuals” allegedly fled.
After being taken into custody, Torres allegedly confessed to trying to impede an agent. Torres remains in custody and is slated to appear for an arraignment on September 25. He faces up to eight years in federal prison and up to a $250,000 fine if convicted.
https://www.mysanantonio.com/news/south-texas/article/south-texas-ice-raid-arrest-21061056.php
MSNBC: Supreme Court issues ruling on Trump’s power to fire FTC commissioner without cause
Chief Justice John Roberts had previously blocked the reinstatement of the agency’s lone Democratic commissioner whom Trump sought to fire.
The Supreme Court has backed President Donald Trump’s power to fire the lone Democrat on the Federal Trade Commission without cause, agreeing at the same time to consider overturning a longstanding precedent that has protected independent agencies.
The high court’s three Democratic appointees dissented from the decision Monday to lift a lower court order that sided with the commissioner, Rebecca Slaughter, while litigation proceeds. The high court’s order said the justices will hear oral argument in the case during its December argument session.
“Our emergency docket should never be used, as it has been this year, to permit what our own precedent bars,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the three Democratic appointees, calling out how the Republican-appointed majority has helped Trump in this and other cases in his second term. “Still more, it should not be used, as it also has been, to transfer government authority from Congress to the President, and thus to reshape the Nation’s separation of powers,” she wrote.
Monday’s order follows Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision on Sept. 8 to temporarily halt Slaughter’s reinstatement while the full Supreme Court considered whether she should be reinstated while litigation over her firing continued. That word from the full court came Monday, as the majority sided with Trump ahead of the December hearing and, in doing so, signaled that it will side with him in its final decision. The court, whose next term starts in early October, typically issues the term’s decisions by early July, meaning a final decision in the Slaughter case should come by then next year.
In July, a federal judge ruled that Trump’s attempt to fire Slaughter was unlawful. A divided appellate panel refused to lift the judge’s order on Sept. 2, citing the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent that endorsed for-cause removal protections. The Roberts Court has weakened that precedent, and the Trump administration has targeted it. The precedent arose in the context of the FTC specifically, raising the possibility that the justices could overturn it outright in Slaughter’s case.
The Supreme Court’s order Monday said the justices want the parties to brief and argue these two questions, specifically naming the 90-year-old precedent:
(1) Whether the statutory removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and, if so, whether Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U. S. 602 (1935), should be overruled. (2) Whether a federal court may prevent a person’s removal from public office, either through relief at equity or at law.
Dissenting from the appellate panel’s Sept. 2 refusal to lift U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan’s order, Trump appointee Neomi Rao acknowledged the Humphrey’s precedent but noted that the Supreme Court has been siding with Trump on his firing powers lately. In any event, the district judge was powerless to order Slaughter’s reinstatement, Rao wrote.
The administration cited Rao’s dissent in seeking to lift AliKhan’s order, casting the case as the latest in Trump’s second term to warrant relief from lower court overreach. “In this case, the lower courts have once again ordered the reinstatement of a high-level officer wielding substantial executive authority whom the President has determined should not exercise any executive power, let alone significant rulemaking and enforcement powers,” U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer wrote to the justices on Sept. 4. Sauer asked the justices to lift AliKhan’s order immediately.
Opposing even a temporary pause in the judge’s order (which Roberts granted Sept. 8), Slaughter’s lawyers said the government wouldn’t be harmed by her continuing to serve while the administration’s application to the justices is pending. They sought to distinguish recent cases in which the court sided with the administration by noting that Slaughter “is the sole Democratic member on a Commission with a three-Republican majority,” so her presence on the FTC wouldn’t result in any meaningful action opposed by the majority.
On Sept. 15, her lawyers further wrote that Congress hadn’t granted Trump the broad power he claims and that if he “is to be given new powers Congress has expressly and repeatedly refused to give him, that decision should come from the people’s elected representatives.” They further argued that “[a]t a minimum, any such far-reaching decision to reverse a considered congressional policy judgment should not be made on the emergency docket,” referring to the court’s rulings made without full briefing, hearing or explanation, which have frequently helped Trump in his second term. It’s the majority’s use of the docket in this way that Kagan and the Democratic appointees called out on Monday.
Slingshot News: ‘Not You, You’re CNN’: Trump Gets Aggressive With ‘Fake News’ Reporter, Refuses To Take Her Question During Press Briefing [Video]
President Donald Trump makes an announcement on autism today at the White House. During Q&A, Trump lashes out at a reporter, outright refusing to take her question because she is affiliated with “fake news” CNN.
Independent: Fruit vendor arrested by border patrol outside Gavin Newsom event speaks out after six weeks in ICE prison
Strawberry delivery driver released on bond after abrupt arrest as agents patrolled governor’s event
Angel Rodrigo Minguela Palacios was unloading boxes of strawberries during his final delivery in Los Angeles when a band of masked Border Patrol agents surrounded him and asked for his identification.
Minguela had unwittingly entered a political minefield on August 14 outside the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo, where California Governor Gavin Newsom was addressing a crowd about his plans to fight back against a Republican-led gerrymandering campaign to maintain control of Congress.
Federal agents deployed by Donald Trump’s administration were patrolling the street directly in front of the building.
The timing of the spectacle drew immediate scrutiny and backlash, with the governor speaking out in the middle of his remarks to condemn what was happening just outside the event. “You think it’s coincidental?” he said.
Minguela, 48, was released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody last week after nearly two months inside a facility he described as a “prison” with lights on at all hours of the day, no beds and only a concrete floor to sleep on.
Detainees received little food, and the conditions were so bleak that some of the men inside volunteered to self-deport rather, he told CBS News.
“Those days were the hardest,” Minguela told The Los Angeles Times. “My first day there on the floor, I cried. It doesn’t matter that you’re men, it doesn’t matter your age. There, men cried.”
Minguela, who is undocumented, has lived in the United States for more than a decade after entering the country from Mexico on a tourist visa. He overstayed his visa after fleeing violence in the Mexican state of Coahuila, where he had been kidnapped twice and stabbed by people trying to steal money from ATMs he was servicing, according to The Times.
He does not have a criminal record.
Minguela was released on bond and is equipped with an ankle monitor as an immigration judge determines next steps in his case.
A spokesperson for Homeland Security said he “was arrested for breaking our country’s laws by overstaying his visa” but remains unclear why he was targeted for arrest.
Minguela had overstayed a tourist visa after fleeing the Mexican state of Coahuila in 2015 because of violence he faced there, his partner said. She said he had worked servicing ATMs there, was kidnapped twice and at one point was stabbed by people intent on stealing the money. After his employers cut staff, she said, he lost his job, helping drive his decision to leave.
On August 14, Minguela left his partner and three children — ages 15, 12 and six — while they were still asleep as he prepared for his daily delivery route at 2 a.m. He had worked for the same produce delivery company for eight years and never missed a day.
Minguela was unloading several boxes of strawberries and a box of apples when he noticed a group of masked Border Patrol agents roaming the area surrounding Newsom’s event.
Video from the scene shows the agents passing his van then doubling back and looking inside to find Minguela. He presented a red “know your rights” card from his wallet and handed it to an agent.
“This is of no use to me,” he said, according to The Times. Agents then asked him his name, nationality and immigration paperwork before leading him away in handcuffs.
“Immigration has already caught me,” Minguela wrote in text messages to his partner. “Don’t worry. God will help us a lot.”
U.S. Border Patrol El Centro Sector Chief Gregory Bovino was observing the arrest. He turned to the officers and shouted out “well done” moments before speaking with reporters who were filming the scene.
“We’re here making Los Angeles a safer place since we don’t have politicians that will do that,” Border Patrol El Centro Sector Chief Gregory Bovino told FOX 11. “We do that ourselves, so that’s why we’re here today.”
Asked whether he had a message for Newsom, who was speaking roughly 100 feet away, Bovino said he wasn’t aware where the governor was.
“I think it’s pretty sick and pathetic,” Newsom said of the arrest.
“They chose the time, manner, and place to send their district director outside right when we’re about to have this press conference,” he said. “That’s everything you know about Donald Trump’s America … about the authoritarian tendencies of the president.”
Minguela believes he was targeted for his appearance.
Immigration raids throughout the Los Angeles area in June sparked massive protests demanding the Trump administration withdraw ICE and federal agents from patrolling immigrant communities.
In response, Trump federalized National Guard troops and sent in hundreds of Marines despite objections from Democratic city and state officials.
A federal judge determined the administration had illegally deployed the Guard as part of an apparent nationwide effort to create “a national police force with the president as its chief.”
The Supreme Court also recently overturned an injunction that blocked federal agents from carrying out sweeps in southern California after a judge determined they were indiscriminately targeting people based on race and whether they spoke Spanish, among other factors.
The court’s opinion drew a forceful rebuke from liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the first Hispanic justice on the bench, who accused the conservative justices of ignoring the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unlawful searches and seizures
“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job,” she wrote in a dissenting opinion.
“The Fourth Amendment protects every individual’s constitutional right to be “free from arbitrary interference by law officers,’” she added. “After today, that may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little.”
Buzz60: Walmart Raises Prices By 45% In 30 Days Due To ‘Magnitude Of The Tariffs’
Something unusual is happening at Walmart. This week, shoppers and workers are spotting big price hikes on toys, groceries, and everyday items.
Some prices are rising by nearly half in just 30 days. People are sharing photos of the new tags online. What’s driving these changes? The answer links back to tariffs announced in Washington, now showing up on America’s store shelves.
Across Walmart locations in the U.S., employees and customers are noticing sharp jumps. Fresh stickers are going up with higher numbers, and shoppers are posting side-by-side photos of old and new tags to show how quickly things have changed.
Much of the first buzz came from Reddit, where Walmart staff uploaded pictures of price changes. These posts quickly spread, giving the public a closer look at how steeply prices are moving in real time.
One of the clearest examples came from sporting goods. A left-handed fishing reel rose from $57.37 in April to $83.26 in May. That’s a 45 percent jump within weeks: proof of just how much tariffs can push prices.
The toy aisle tells a similar story. A Jurassic World T. rex climbed from $39.92 on April 27 to $55 by May 21. A Baby Born doll that cost under $35 in March was nearly $50 two months later. Parents are feeling the pinch.
Walmart makes about 60 percent of its U.S. sales from groceries. Even small increases here can affect millions of families. Cocoa powder, for example, jumped from $3.44 in 2024 to $6.18 in 2025, showing that food costs are not immune.
The main reason is tariffs. In April, President Donald Trump announced a 10 percent tax on imports. Vendors passed these costs on to Walmart, and Walmart says it can’t absorb them all without raising prices for shoppers.
Doug McMillon, Walmart’s CEO, put it simply: “We’ll keep prices as low as possible, but given the magnitude of the tariffs, we can’t take on all the pressure.” For a low-margin retailer, the math leaves little choice.
Walmart’s size means these changes affect huge numbers of people. As of July 31, 2025, Walmart runs 5,206 stores in the U.S., including 4,606 Walmart locations and 600 Sam’s Clubs. When Walmart prices shift, millions of households notice.
Walmart makes most of its money by selling lots of goods at low prices. Its thin profit margins mean that even small increases in supply costs show up quickly at checkout. Tariffs hit this model directly.
Tariffs were announced in April. By May, Walmart was already raising prices. That short gap shows how quickly higher import costs move from global trade decisions to store shelves.
Walmart isn’t alone. Many U.S. companies are also adjusting prices upward. The toy industry has warned that nearly every retailer relying on Chinese imports will feel the strain.
Most toys sold in the U.S. are made in China. That means nearly every part of the toy supply chain now costs more. With no way to absorb those costs, stores pass them to parents.
When asked about toy prices, Trump downplayed concerns: “Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls.” His remark fueled debate about whether tariffs really protect U.S. jobs… or mainly just raise costs for families.
Online, shoppers are voicing anger. Many share receipts or photos showing items marked up by double digits in a matter of weeks. Some say they’re cutting back or shopping elsewhere, but most note Walmart has few low-cost rivals.
CFO John David Rainey told reporters that Walmart’s strategy remains strong, but protecting profits while prices rise is a challenge. For now, the company is focused on managing growth and costs at the same time.
Economists warn that if tariffs continue, more categories, from electronics to clothing—could rise in price. Long-term pressure may shift how families spend and how stores compete.
For the millions who shop Walmart weekly, a 30 to 40 percent increase on basics adds up fast. Families already stretched by inflation say they feel these hikes directly in their budgets.
With prices climbing, shoppers and experts are calling for more clear labeling about why costs are rising. Some want receipts or shelf tags to show when tariffs, not just supply shortages, are driving increases.
For now, Walmart is passing costs along as tariffs take hold. Whether things settle depends on trade policy in the months ahead.
What started as a government decision is now being felt in the everyday purchases of millions of Americans.
Reuters: Trump signs order targeting antifa as a ‘terrorist organization’
- Trump designates antifa a ‘terrorist organization’
- Critics warn of potential free speech attack
- Legal experts question constitutionality of designation
U.S. President Donald Trumpsigned an executive order on Monday calling the antifa movement a “terrorist organization,” the White House said, after promising actions targeting left-wing groups following Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Kirk, a prominent conservative activist with close ties to Trump, was assassinated on September 10 while speaking on a college campus in Utah. A 22-year-old technical college student has been charged with Kirk’s murder.
Investigators are still looking for a motive and have not said the suspect operated in concert with any groups. But the Trump administration has used the killing as a pretext to revive years-old plans to target left-wing groups they regard as being hostile to conservative views.
Antifa, short for anti-fascist, is a “decentralized, leaderless movement composed of loose collections of groups, networks and individuals,” according to the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks extremists.
“While some extreme actors who claim to be affiliated with antifa do engage in violence or vandalism at rallies and events, this is not the norm,” it says on its website.
Trump’s 370-word executive order directs “all relevant executive departments and agencies” to “investigate, disrupt, and dismantle any and all illegal operations” conducted by antifa or anyone who funds such actions, according to the White House.
“Individuals associated with and acting on behalf of Antifa further coordinate with other organizations and entities for the purpose of spreading, fomenting, and advancing political violence and suppressing lawful political speech.”
Federal law enforcement officials already investigate violent and organized crime associated with a variety of hate groups and ideological movements.
The U.S. government does not currently officially designate solely domestic groups as terrorist organizations in large part because of constitutional protections.
But a Justice Department official with knowledge of discussions on the issue said Trump’s order would unlock expansive investigative and surveillance authorities and powers.
The person, who declined to be named, said the designation would allow the U.S. government to more closely track the finances and movements of U.S. citizens and to investigate any foreign ties of the loose network of groups and nonprofits the Trump administration views as antifa.
FOCUS IS ON FOREIGN FUNDING
Critics of the administration have warned it may pursue an attack on free speech and opponents of the Republican president.
The FBI’s Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence Divisions will be used to track finances – both domestic and foreign sources of funding – and attempt to identify the central leadership of antifa, the official said. FBI surveillance and investigative operations are normally restricted in how they can target U.S. citizens.
“The big picture focus is on foreign money seeding U.S. politics and drawing connections to foreign bank accounts,” a White House source familiar with the plans told Reuters.
“The designation of antifa gives us the authority to subpoena banks, look at wire transfers, foreign and domestic sources of funding, that kind of thing,” the White House source said.
It was not clear which individuals would be the target of such a probe.
Political violence experts and U.S. law enforcement officials have previously identified far-right attacks as the leading source of domestic violent extremism. Trump administration officials have sought to portray left-wing groups as the main drivers of political violence in their remarks since Kirk’s death.
Legal experts have said the domestic terrorism designation may be legally and constitutionally dubious, hard to execute and raise free-speech concerns, given that subscription to an ideology is not generally considered criminal under U.S. law.
During the first Trump administration there were at least two failed efforts to designate antifa a terrorist organization, according to internal Department of Homeland Security communications viewed by Reuters.


