Inquisitr: Donald Trump Struggles With Basic Math, Sparks Memes Over ‘500% Price Cut’ Claim

Trump’s math on drug prices is giving America a collective migraine.

Although President Donald Trump has consistently made dramatic claims, his most recent promise to cut the cost of prescription drugs drastically left many confused and chuckling aloud. Trump repeated his well-known talking point (that he is lowering drug prices) during his speech at the American Cornerstone Institute’s Founder’s Dinner at George Washington’s Mount Vernon estate.

The catch? His math skills were, well, let’s say, fit for a comedy sketch.

He bragged, “United States, you’re gonna see the biggest cuts in drug prices (…) we’re gonna literally be cutting prices by 500 percent, 600 percent,” before citing the bizarre example of prescription drugs costing $88 in London and $130 in the United States.

If you were wondering, the government (or pharmaceutical companies) would have to pay you to take medicine if prices were reduced by more than 100%! So, according to Trump, Americans will be leaving CVS with free insulin, inhalers, and a bonus check.

Associated Press fact-checkers quickly reminded everyone that Trump’s claims were false.

They mentioned that although his administration took steps to reduce costs, no one has ever seen the “1,200 to 1,500 percent” drops he constantly boasts about. Anything over 100% is not only erroneous but mathematically impossible, per the AP.

In a move to maintain some truth in the messaging, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said that it is still “committed to carrying out President Trump’s directive to lower prescription drug prices.” However, the numbers that Donald Trump was randomly flinging around had already gone viral, provoking social media memes and booing.

Mary Trump, Donald Trump’s outspoken niece, added fuel to the fire by mocking him in a video that went viral. She laughed at her uncle’s inflated claims, calling him an “incompetent moron” who was incapable of performing “basic arithmetic.”

“From what I understand about doing basic arithmetic, this would mean that at a discount of 1500%, the asthma inhaler I now pay $700 for every other month will (…) be free,” she said. “The pharmaceutical company that makes that inhaler will have to pay me $1493000 every time I get a refill.” She sarcastically broke down the calculations and concluded that “Everybody except Donald” seems to understand that cutting expenses by 1500% is mathematically impossible.

The trolling was swift and intense. People joked that Americans would soon become millionaires from filling their prescriptions if Trump’s calculations were correct. Others noted that he has been making these overblown claims for months; in August, for example, he used the exact phrase, “1,200, 1,300, 1,500 percent.”

Donald Trump’s claim that he is not only influencing drug prices but also changing economics has become something of a joke. Trump’s war on Big Pharma may have been an election promise that won over us, but his numbers affect his reputation.

Fresno Bee: Fresno southeast Asians detained at ICE check-ins, advocates say

Southeast Asian residents are being detained at ICE check-ins in Fresno, advocates and an immigration lawyer say. In some cases, refugees are being deported to countries where they’ve never lived, they say.

It’s not immediately clear how many members from Fresno’s Southeast Asian community have been detained at ICE check-ins and deported since President Donald Trump launched what he says will be the largest deportation campaign in history. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to request for comment on this story.

Many of these individuals are refugees with minor criminal records from years ago that could subject them to deportation, advocates say. But they weren’t deported earlier because, as refugees, the countries they were born in don’t recognize their citizenship. Some were born in refugee camps and are considered stateless. Or, the U.S. didn’t have an agreement in place to deport them to their home countries. In lieu of deportation, they were required to have regular check-ins with ICE.

While these check-ins were a longstanding practice, now, some are of these people are being detained and forced to return to countries they and their families were forced to flee due to political persecution, war and genocide.

Fresno has a large Southeast Asian community, from countries such as Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos. It’s also home to the second largest concentrations of Hmong people nationwide, many descendants of U.S. allies during the Vietnam War.

“A lot of them are refugees or children of these veterans (and) have committed a senseless crime when they were teenagers,” said Pao Yang, president and CEO of The Fresno Center. “And then now you’re sending these children of these veterans that fought with the U.S. back to a country that they were fighting against with you.”

During the first Trump administration, the government tried to put pressure on Southeast Asian countries to receive people with deportation orders to those countries. Those efforts have ramped up this year during Trump’s second term, said Tilman Jacobs, an immigrants rights supervising attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, the nation’s oldest Asian American civil rights advocacy group.

“These communities are being impacted in a way that we haven’t seen before,” Jacobs said. Individuals have been deported from ICE check-ins in Fresno, he said, though he didn’t have an estimate on how many had been detained.

Yang, the Fresno Center CEO, said he also knows of “many” Fresno clients that have been detained and transferred to the Golden State Annex ICE detention center in McFarland, where they are held as they await next steps in their immigration cases.

As of late August, Christine Barker, executive director of the refugee-serving nonprofit, Fresno Immigrant and Refugee Ministries, knew of at least five individuals of Laotian or Cambodian descent being detained at their ICE check-ins in Fresno.

“I also know from some of their family members, when they got to [the Golden State Annex ICE detention center in] McFarland, they were like, ‘there’s a lot of Asian people here,” she said.

While California’s Southeast Asian communities have experienced more sporadic immigration enforcement, other states such as Michigan and Minnesota have seen more high-profile enforcement activity. More than 150 Southeast Asians have been deported from Minnesota since May, according to an Aug. 18 report in the Minnesota Reformer.

Jacobs said the practice of detaining people at ICE check-ins was more common during the first five or six months of the administration, but he hasn’t seen as much of it recently in California.

“That doesn’t mean it’s not going to continue happening,” he said. “It’s definitely a real risk. But I also don’t want to overstate it.”

Hmong people are an ethnic group originating from China and that have their own language and culture. Because of decades of persecution by the Chinese government over their cultural and spiritual practices, the Hmong have constantly migrated to Vietnam, Laos, Thailand and Myanmar. In the early 1960s, the CIA recruited Hmong people to help fight against North Vietnam and the communist party in Laos, known as the Pathet Lao. The operation, also known as The Secret War, lasted from 1962 to 1975. When the Pathet Lao took over Laos’s governance, thousands of Hmong and Laotian people sought refuge in the United States in 1975.

Barker said what’s happening to these refugees is a violation of human rights.

“When you’re a refugee, the world is supposed to protect you from ever having to return to the country you fled,” she said. “These are uncles, these are grandpas, these are old, old convictions from the 80s and the 90s.”

Deported to Laos, Cambodia

Families, lawyers and nonprofits are scrambling to support individuals that have been deported to countries such as Laos and Cambodia.

Thao Ha, runs Collective Freedom, an organization that supports “justice-impacted” individuals from Southeast Asian communities. In recent months, her organization has had to pivot to provide support on the ground in Laos and is helping families track down their deported loved ones.

“We didn’t think they were going to go this hard, this fast, or at all,” she said. The community had assumptions that people couldn’t get deported to Laos, or that only a few here and there would be deported, Ha said.

Laos doesn’t have a formal repatriation agreement with the U.S., according to the Asian Law Caucus. But the Trump administration has pressured Laos to accept deportees — including people who were not born in the country and whose parents fled the country — by threatening to withhold business and tourist visas to Lao citizens.

When people are deported to Laos, they are detained upon entry in Laos for multiple weeks, advocates say. Those with a local sponsor are released more quickly. Those who don’t have a sponsor will be detained longer until the government can process them.

Ha said there’s no official repatriation process in Laos, meaning there’s little infrastructure to help people with housing, work, or cultural adjustment.

“There’s not an agency, so to speak,” Ha said. “We’re just trying to rapid response and mutual aid at this point.” Several groups have “popped up” to try to fill the gaps, but none are formal non-governmental organizations.

The “number one challenge” for people with their loved ones being deported to Laos is that they don’t have family there, Ha said. “If they don’t have family and don’t have a sponsor, where do they go? What do they do? Are they just roaming the streets?”

For some deported to Laos, especially those born in refugee camps, they have no relationship to the country, language skills or community knowledge. “For Hmong folks who grew up in the U.S., they may never learn Lao,” Barker said.

Barker also said there used to be programs to help people from the Khmer Indigenous ethnic group acculturate in Cambodia.

“Those programs disappeared when USAID was gutted,” she said.

Fleeing war, genocide, persecution

Jacobs of the Asian Law Caucus said his organization works with Southeast Asian refugees who are facing pending deportation, oftentimes from very old convictions.

“Many of the people that we work with have consistently followed all of those terms with their release and continue to do so,” Jacobs said. “And I know that there is a lot of anxiety right now around these check-ins.”

Many of the organization’s clients were fleeing civil war, genocide and persecution and carry memories of trauma associated with the unfamiliar country, he said.

“In many cases, there are countries that don’t really want to receive people who left so long ago, and what a lot of them are facing in real terms, is statelessness where they’re not recognized as citizens of those countries,” he said.

For example, he said, Hmong people in Laos are given some kind of residency status, but they are not citizens. And this sense of not belonging can have lingering legal, emotional and psychological impact.

Yang said many in the Southeast Asian immigrant community are quiet and scared because many come from a country where the government targets people. Earlier this year, there was a rush of people seeking legal services, but now, especially after the start of the June immigration crackdown in Los Angeles, he’s noticed a “huge drop” in people seeking assistance.

“We have a lot of folks, even legal resident aliens, that are in hiding, that are afraid,” he said.

https://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article312072747.html

Slingshot News: ‘China, Where’s Your Wind Farm?’: Trump Ignorantly Claims China Doesn’t Produce Wind Energy In Failed Attempt To Discredit Renewables [Video]

During his remarks at the Energy and Innovation Summit in Pennsylvania several weeks ago, Donald Trump ignorantly made the implication that China doesn’t produce wind energy. A quick search on the internet shows that China is the global leader in wind energy production.


The same fool, who criticizes European leaders for their reliance on wind power, is now chiding China for not generating enough wind energy.

Slingshot News: ‘Windmills Should Not Be Allowed!’: Trump Loses His Mind Over Renewable Energy, Derails Meeting With EU Commission President [Video]

During a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland several weeks ago, Donald Trump veered off topic and went on an unhinged tirade over windmills and wind energy. Trump exclaimed, “windmills should not be allowed!”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/windmills-should-not-be-allowed-trump-loses-his-mind-over-renewable-energy-derails-meeting-with-eu-commission-president/vi-AA1MZZaj

Slingshot News: ‘I Don’t Know If I Did It, But I Think I Did’: Trump Puts His Incompetence On Display, Rambles About Defense Spending During Remarks At NATO Event [Video]

During his remarks at a NATO event in June, President Trump put his incompetence on display while rambling about defense spending. Trump stated, “I don’t know if I did it, but I think I did.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/i-don-t-know-if-i-did-it-but-i-think-i-did-trump-puts-his-incompetence-on-display-rambles-about-defense-spending-during-remarks-at-nato-event/vi-AA1MYX47

Morning Rush: Columbia Grad Student Faces Deportation Over Undisclosed Activities [Video]

Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and pro-Palestinian activist, has been ordered by an immigration judge to be deported from the United States. Khalil, who has been detained in Louisiana since his arrest in March, is facing deportation to either Syria or Algeria, despite not being charged with any crime. As a legal permanent resident, his deportation comes as a result of failing to disclose connections to a campus anti-Israel group on his green card application, according to court documents. This case has sparked discussion on the transparency requirements for immigration applications and the rights of permanent residents in the U.S. Khalil’s situation underscores the complex intersection of immigration law and activism, raising questions about the balance between national security and individual freedoms.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/columbia-grad-student-faces-deportation-over-undisclosed-activities/vi-AA1MPWqI

Latin Times: UN Human Rights Experts Condemn U.S. Strikes on Venezuelan Boats as ‘Extrajudicial Executions’

“International law does not allow governments to simply murder alleged drug traffickers,” said the three independent UN experts in a statement on Tuesday

United Nations human rights experts have condemned recent U.S. military strikes on Venezuelan vessels, calling them “extrajudicial executions” in violation of international law. The operations, ordered by President Donald Trump, killed at least 14 people this month, according to both U.S. and UN accounts.

“International law does not allow governments to simply murder alleged drug traffickers,” three independent UN experts said in a statement on Tuesday. The experts, who report to the UN Human Rights Council but do not speak on behalf of the United Nations, stressed that lethal force is only lawful in situations of personal or immediate defense against an imminent threat to life.

The experts pointed to two incidents: the destruction of a boat on September 2 that killed 11 people and a second strike on September 15 that killed three more. They said the attacks violated both the right to life and the international law of the sea, which prohibits unprovoked attacks on civilian vessels and requires that interceptions be conducted through law enforcement, not military force.

“Criminal activities should be disrupted, investigated and prosecuted in accordance with the rule of law, including through international cooperation,” added the expert.

Trump has claimed that three Venezuelan boats in total have been “knocked off” by U.S. forces, though he has not clarified the details of the third. His administration has said the targeted vessels were linked to the Tren de Aragua criminal group, which the U.S. has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

The UN experts rejected the U.S. justification, saying there was “no evidence that this group is committing an armed attack against the U.S. that would allow the U.S. to use military force against it in national self-defence.” They urged Washington to investigate those responsible, prosecute perpetrators “no matter how senior in government,” and provide reparations to victims’ families.

The strikes come amid a major U.S. naval build-up in the Caribbean, which includes warships, submarines, and fighter jets. Administration officials have described the deployments as part of counter-narcotics operations, but Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has called them acts of aggression aimed at regime change.

The UN experts warned that the U.S. actions amount to a “lawless ‘war on narco-terrorism'” and urged Washington to step back. “International law does not permit the unilateral use of force abroad to fight terrorism or drug trafficking,” they said.

https://www.latintimes.com/un-human-rights-experts-condemn-us-strikes-venezuelan-boats-extrajudicial-executions-589654

Fox News: Trump warns Afghanistan over return of strategic Bagram Air Base to US control [Video]

The Taliban has controlled the airbase since 2021 and the US withdrew troops from the country

President Donald Trump on Saturday threatened Afghanistan, which is governed by the Taliban, if Bagram Air Base isn’t returned to the United States. 

“If Afghanistan doesn’t give Bagram Airbase back to those that built it, the United States of America, BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN!!!” he wrote on Truth Social. 

The president didn’t elaborate on what consequences the country might face.

On Thursday, the president said the administration is “trying” to get the former U.S. Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan “back” from the Taliban.

In remarks to the press while standing alongside U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the president criticized the handling of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan under President Joe Biden and said he had “a little breaking news.”

“We’re trying to get it back,” Trump said. “We’re trying to get it back because they need things from us.”

Trump did not expand on whom he was referring to or, if referring to the Taliban, the terrorist organization that took over the country in 2021, what they “need” from the U.S.

“We want that base back, but one of the reasons we want the base is, as you know, it’s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons,” Trump added. 

On Saturday evening, Trump told reporters the administration wants Bagram back “right away,” and “if they don’t do it, you’re going to find out what I’m going to do.” 

The Taliban took over the country after the U.S. pulled out of Afghanistan in 2021. 

The U.S. claimed Bagram Air Base, which was built by the Soviets in the 1950s, in 2001 when the military went into Afghanistan following the 9/11 attacks. 

In 2021, when the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan, it secretly left the base in the middle of the night on July 1, leaving it to the Afghan government. 

The Taliban captured the base six weeks later in August of 2021, on the same day Kabul fell. 

Earlier this year, White House hostage envoy Adam Boehler met with Taliban officials in Kabul while working to get hostage George Glezmann released, the first direct meeting since the pullout in 2021. 

Boehler, along with another U.S. envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, met with the Taliban’s foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, and reportedly discussed ways to “develop bilateral relations between the two countries, issues related to citizens, and investment opportunities in Afghanistan,” according to a Taliban statement. 

The removal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan began during the first Trump administration in March 2020, and open-source intelligence showed that the Taliban had been making gains across Afghanistan in the year leading up to the August 2021 withdrawal. 

Under the deal forged by the first Trump administration, the U.S. agreed to withdraw all U.S. forces by May 1, 2021, but Biden extended the withdrawal date to August 2021. 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-warns-afghanistan-over-return-strategic-bagram-airbase-us-control

BBC: Sikh granny’s arrest by US immigration sparks community anger

The visiting room of the Mesa Verde ICE Processing Centre in Bakersfield, California, is small, loud, and crowded. When Harjit Kaur’s family arrived to see her, they could barely hear her – and the first words they caught shattered them.

“She said, ‘I would rather die than be in this facility. May God just take me now’,” recalled her distraught daughter-in-law, Manjit Kaur.

Harjit Kaur, 73, who unsuccessfully applied for asylum in the US, and has lived in California for more than three decades, was arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials on 8 September, sparking shock and sympathy from the Sikh community across the state and beyond.

Harjit Kaur had filed several asylum appeals over the years which were rejected, with the last denial in 2012, her lawyer said.

Since then, she had been asked to report to immigration authorities every six months. She was arrested in San Francisco when she had gone for a check-in.

It comes amid a wider crackdown by the Donald Trump administration on immigration, and especially alleged illegal immigrants in the US.

The issue is a sensitive one – the country is grappling with how to deal with the hundreds of thousands of asylum seekers who arrive at its borders every year. More than 3.7 million asylum cases are pending in immigration courts. An increased budget for immigration enforcement means ICE is now the highest-funded federal law enforcement agency.

Trump has said he wants to deport the “worst of the worst”, but critics say immigrants without criminal records who follow due process have also been targeted.

“Over 70% of people arrested by ICE have no criminal conviction,” said California State Senator Jesse Arreguin in a statement demanding Harjit Kaur’s release. “Now, they are literally going after peaceful grandmothers. This shameful act is harming our communities.”

US Congressman John Garamendi, who represents the Californian district where Harjit Kaur lives, has submitted a request to ICE for her release.

“This administration’s decision to detain a 73-year-old woman – a respected member of the community with no criminal record who has faithfully reported to ICE every six months for more than 13 years – is one more example of the misplaced priorities of Trump’s immigration enforcement,” a spokesperson said.

In an emailed statement, ICE told the BBC that Harjit Kaur had “exhausted decades of due process” and that an immigration judge had ordered her removal in 2005.

“Harjit Kaur has filed multiple appeals all the way up to the Ninth Circuit Court of appeals and LOST each time. Now that she has exhausted all legal remedies, ICE is enforcing US law and the orders by the judge; she will not waste any more US tax dollars,” it added.

Harjit Kaur came to the US in 1991 with her two minor sons after the death of her husband, her lawyer Deepak Ahluwalia told the BBC. Her daughter-in-law Manjit Kaur said that the young widow wanted to shield her sons from and escape the political turbulence in India’s Punjab state at the time.

Over the next three decades, she worked modest jobs to raise her sons, one of whom is now a US citizen. Her five grandchildren are also US citizens.

Harjit Kaur, who lives in Hercules city in the San Francisco Bay Area, was working as a seamstress at a sari store for the past two decades and pays her taxes. Asylum applicants across the US are allowed to live, work and pay taxes legally once their claim is officially filed and in process.

Even after her final asylum appeal was rejected in 2012, her job permit was renewed every year.

After the rejection, her deportation seemed imminent, but she didn’t have the right documents to travel to India.

Indian missions in the US issue emergency certificates – a one-way travel document – to Indians of invalid status to enable them to return. This would require verifying Harjit Kaur’s origin and identity in Punjab through photos, cross-checking with relatives or acquaintances or finding old records, which would take at least a few weeks.

More than a decade since the rejection, neither Harjit Kaur nor US immigration officials have been able to get a travel permit for her. Manjit Kaur said they visited the Indian consulate in San Francisco in 2013 for this but didn’t succeed. India’s Consul General at San Francisco K Srikar Reddy told the BBC they had no record of Harjit Kaur applying for travel documents to India.

ICE did not respond to a question about why it did not get a travel permit in the past 13 years.

Mr Ahluwalia said he is following up with the Indian consulate for the documents which “ICE was unable to procure for the last 13 years”. The consulate says they are “facilitating all necessary consular assistance”.

Harjit Kaur’s family, meanwhile, say she never questioned her deportation and should not have been detained.

“Provide us the travel documents and she is ready to go,” Manjit Kaur said. “She had even packed her suitcases back in 2012.”

Right now, their immediate concern is getting her out of the detention centre.

“You can put an ankle monitor on her. We can check in with immigration when you want,” said Manjit Kaur. “Just get her out of the facility and when you provide us the travel documents, she will self-deport to India.”

Her lawyer said that when he met Harjit Kaur on 15 September, she had not been provided with her regular medication. He alleged that she had been “dragged by guards”, “denied a chair or a bed” and was “forced to sit on the floor” for hours in a holding cell despite having undergone double knee replacement.

He also alleged that she was “explicitly refused water” and not provided a vegetarian meal for the first six days.

ICE did not respond to specific questions on these allegations, but had earlier told BBC Punjabi that “it is a long-standing policy that as soon as someone comes into ICE custody, they are given full health care”.

Detainees have access to “medical appointments and 24-hour emergency care” and no-one “is denied essential care at any time during detention”, it added.

Kulvinder Singh Pannu, president of the gurdwara committee at The Sikh Centre in San Francisco Bay Area, says that Bibi Harjit (a respectful way to refer to an elderly Punjabi woman) is well-liked in the area.

“She always helped people in our community with whatever she had financially,” he said.

“A couple of hundred people turned up by themselves to protest against her arrest,” he said, referring to a 12 September agitation outside the Sikh temple in California.

As the uncertainty continues, Harjit Kaur’s supporters are planning to hold more protests, including in other US cities, with many saying they are touched by her plight.

A single mother, Harjit Kaur had formed deep roots and relationships in the US over the past 30 years. Her parents and siblings in India are no longer alive, says Mr Ahluwalia.

“She has no-one, no home, no land to return to.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgq63lgn7zo

Newsweek: Trump administration asks Supreme Court for new emergency order

The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to let it move forward with ending protections for more than 300,000 Venezuelan migrants. The Justice Department is seeking to block a San Francisco judge’s ruling that found the administration acted unlawfully when it terminated Temporary Protected Status for the group.

A federal appeals court declined to halt U.S. District Judge Edward Chen’s decision while the case proceeds.

In May, the Supreme Court had already overturned another Chen order affecting about 350,000 Venezuelans, without explanation, as is typical for emergency appeals. Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices the earlier ruling should guide them again.

Why It Matters

The Trump administration has taken a hardline stance on Temporary Protected Status, arguing that the protections are meant to be temporary but have been abused by consecutive administrations. Immigration advocates have countered, saying that conditions in Venezuela and other countries have not improved enough to send people home.

What To Know

Friday’s plea by the Trump administration continues a cycle of court orders and challenges around the attempts by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to end TPS for two groups of Venezuelans.

“This case is familiar to the Court and involves the increasingly familiar and
untenable phenomenon of lower courts disregarding this Court’s orders on the emergency docket,” the administration wrote in its submission to the Supreme Court.

The argument is that Chen’s final order in the case rested on the same legal basis that had been stayed by the Supreme Court just months earlier.

This back-and-forth has left around 300,000 Venezuelans in limbo, alongside thousands more in a second group also facing the potential loss of their legal status.

Under TPS, immigrants from designated countries are allowed to remain in the United States without fear of deportation. They are granted permission to work while in the U.S., and can sometimes travel out of the country.

Noem and her predecessors hold the power to grant and revoke TPS per country. Status is renewed every 18 months, and the first Trump administration made similar attempts to revoke it but also faced legal challenges, which continued until President Joe Biden took office in 2021.

Part of Noem’s reasoning is that conditions in Venezuela have improved significantly, meaning it is safe for immigrants to return home. This has not necessarily aligned with the broader Trump administration’s views on the South American nation and its leader, Nicolas Maduro.

Trump Admin Moves to Revoke TPS for Syria

Also on Friday, the DHS moved to revoke TPS for another country: Syria.

In a Federal Register notice, the DHS reiterated that conditions had improved in the country, indicating that TPS was no longer necessary. Protections are set to lapse on September 30, 2025.

Protections were first introduced in 2012, at the height of the unrest in the Middle East at the time.

What People Are Saying

The Trump administration, in its filing to the Supreme Court Friday: “Since the statute was enacted, every administration has designated countries for TPS or extended those designations in extraordinary circumstances. But Secretaries across administrations have also terminated designations when the conditions
were no longer met.”

Adelys Ferro, co-founder and executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, told Newsweek on August 29: “We, more than 8 million Venezuelans, just didn’t leave the country just because it’s fun, it’s because we had no choice…Venezuelans with TPS are not a threat to the United States.”

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court must now decide whether to take up the appeal.

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-donald-trump-immigrants-deportation-venezuela-migrants-2132804