For nearly a decade, President Donald Trump has had what many experts describe as an “iron-clad grip” on his party. However, July appears to mark what conservative columnist Matt Lewis described as the beginning of the end of the Trump era.
“It took six months into President Trump’s second term to get here, but something shifted in Trump World this month,” Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published Friday in The Hill.
“The administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case – including its assertion that a ‘client list’ doesn’t exist – sent tremors through the MAGA ecosystem, creating a permission structure for key players on the right to start treating Trump like a lame duck.”
The Trump administration’s handling of the case on Epstein – the convicted sex offender who died in 2019 awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges – has indeed been an anomaly for Trump, who ordinarily comes out of any scandal unscathed by his most loyal supporters, and in many cases, even more popular, such as after his dozens of criminal indictments last year.
On Epstein, however, Trump’s hesitancy to release documents related to the disgraced financier, along with his attacks on those who demand transparency, have sent a shockwave through MAGA world that Lewis said appeared to mark a turning point in the president’s control of the GOP.
“Taken together – the reality of Trump’s lame-duck status, being out of touch with much of his base and now the physical deterioration – we are left with a picture of a man whose once iron-clad grip on his party is finally beginning to loosen,” Lewis wrote.
“The base might not say it outright. MAGA influencers certainly won’t admit it – but they absolutely see it. And more importantly, they’re starting to act on it. The jostling has begun.”
Trump’s path to irrelevancy, Lewis argued, will also likely ignite a crisis in the Republican Party, a party Lewis said had been “hollowed out” by Trump and had its institutions “scorched.”
“This is the tragedy and farce of the post-Trump GOP: it bet everything on a single man, and now it has no idea how to function without him,” Lewis wrote.
Tag Archives: Trump administrations
MSNBC: How DOGE’s reckless cuts created chaos at the Social Security Administration
Staff reassignments are not going to fix the growing problems at the agency.
The Trump administration’s colossal cuts to the Social Security Administration in the name of “efficiency” are sowing chaos and dysfunction throughout the agency. Even attempts to fix these new problems are akin to rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship because they fail to address the core problem: staff shortages.
The Washington Post reports the SSA is “temporarily reassigning about 1,000 customer service representatives from field offices to work on the swamped toll-free phone line, increasing the number of agents by 25 percent.” And when the Post reports the phone line is “swamped,” what that means in practice is that people are complaining about dropped calls and previously reported wait times of up to five hours.
But there’s one little oversight: There is no one in place to do the work that the reassigned representatives had to leave behind. According to the Post, “Jessica LaPointe, president of Council 220 of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), said the move will slow responses to the complex cases that the field office employees handle and be only a temporary bandage for the phone problems.”
“The 1-800 number — they do offer a critical role at the agency, but it’s triage, whereas customer service representatives actually clear work for the agency,” LaPointe told the Post. “So it’s just going to create a vicious cycle of work not getting cleared, people calling for status on work that’s sitting because the claims specialists now are going to have to pick up the slack of the customer service representatives that are redeployed to the tele-service centers.”
So how did the SSA end up so shorthanded that it has to rob Peter to pay Paul? Before the second Trump administration, SSA had a staff of roughly 57,000. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, the Trump administration’s DOGE operation enacted “the largest staffing cut in SSA’s history,” which involved “indiscriminately pushing out 7,000 workers to hit an arbitrary staffing reduction target.” The Trump administration has also ousted dozens of officials with expertise in running SSA’s benefits and information technology systems.
On top of the problems noted above, reassigning workers adds further inefficiency because they have to do on-the-job training and lean on more experienced co-workers to get them up to speed. And field offices themselves were already beleaguered, dealing with the effects of other reassignments within SSA. “Field office staff are struggling to resolve the most difficult cases, due to disproportionate losses and reassignments in SSA’s regional offices, which provide daily support to their colleagues in the field by answering complex policy questions and troubleshooting system problems,” the CBPP reports.
Trump’s “efficiency” efforts now have a single staff member serving 1,480 beneficiaries, according to AFGE. That’s three times the number of clients that one staffer served in 1967.
On top of all this, the SSA’s new phone system, implemented in May, seems to have problems of its own. Jen Burdick, a Social Security expert and a divisional supervising attorney with Community Legal Services, told The Philadelphia Inquirer that the system’s new artificial intelligence could be exacerbating the problem.
“We spend a lot of time calling Social Security offices on people’s behalf — sometimes 15 times a day,” Burdick told the Inquirer. “We’re on hold for hours, then get AI bots spewing random information you never asked for before hanging up.”
“It really hurts our clients who are in trouble, trying to navigate this difficult system. It’s very upsetting for people,” she added.
Staff shortages seem to result occasionally in callers being rerouted to offices in other parts of the country, the Inquirer report adds, and thus the responding staffer is not always able to answer specific questions.
Trump is turning one of the country’s most important lifelines for the elderly and the disabled into a mess — all for foreseeable reasons. Indiscriminate mass cuts don’t represent a serious bid at generating efficiency in administering a public benefit. The only thing these cuts do with any efficiency is rip a major hole in the American safety net.
The future doesn’t look so good, either. Trump’s recently passed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is only going to make things worse, since changes in the tax code will accelerate Social Security and Medicare’s insolvency. MAGA’s policy vision is all about divestment from the common good — and America’s collective future.
MSNBC: Stephen Miller is becoming a victim of his mass deportation policy’s success
The chief architect of Trump’s mass deportation policy faces internal pushback as the effects of increased ICE raids become clear.
In a meeting last month, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller tore into senior leaders at Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, demanding a massive surge in arrests of undocumented immigrants. As ICE tried to comply with Miller’s orders, immigration activists and other concerned Americans launched a series of protests in defiance of the mass deportation agenda. But it was a different set of protests that got the attention of Miller’s boss, President Donald Trump.
Last Thursday, the administration abruptly paused raids and arrests at hotels, farms and restaurants, a stunning shift in priorities that was clearly contrary to Miller’s orders. But the change was short-lived. The Department of Homeland Security reversed that guidance Monday, according to The Washington Post, allowing the immigration raids on those industries to resume and letting Miller retake control of the policy that has been the focus of his years in both Trump administrations.
Since Inauguration Day, Miller has had carte blanche on immigration policy in his dual role as deputy chief of staff and homeland security adviser. His insistence that ICE make 3,000 arrests per day kick-started a scramble from field offices to meet his demand. But as Vox’s Eric Levitz recently noted, Miller’s own strategy of deterrence at the border has led to a decline in the kind of encounters that would make it easy for ICE agents to rack up those numbers:
Over the past two months, America witnessed the largest decline in its foreign-born workforce since the pandemic in 2020. This contraction was driven partly by a collapse in unauthorized border crossings. Between January 2022 and June 2024, US Customs and Border Protection encountered an average of 200,000 people per month at America’s Southwest border. According to an analysis of government data from Deutsche Bank, that figure has fallen to just 12,000 people per month since Trump’s inauguration.
That has meant ICE has had to expand its list of targets to meet its quotas, including rounding up day laborers in Home Depot parking lots and field workers toiling on farms. The resulting climate of fear has scared more than just undocumented immigrants in these workforces. A Texas farmer recently told NBC affiliate KVEO of Brownsville, Texas, that within the last three weeks, there have been “zero people wanting to come out and be exposed to be able to be picked up whether they are legal or illegal.”

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/stephen-miller-ice-deportation-rcna213491