The home of a South Carolina judge was destroyed after it went up in flames on Saturday.
A fire engulfed the home of Judge Diane Goodstein, who serves on the state Circuit Court, and led to three people being hospitalized with injuries, including her husband, according to a report from The Post and Courier.
The cause of the fire is not immediately known, and the State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) said it is investigating the incident.
Newsweek contacted SLED via email on Monday outside regular working hours.
Goodstein later said she is “alright” in her first comments since the fire, made to the Daily Mail.
Why It Matters
The fire comes weeks after Goodstein issued a ruling against the Trump administration.
Authorities have not yet determined the cause of the blaze, and there is currently no evidence to suggest it was an act of arson. The incident quickly sparked online conversation hostility toward members of the judiciary who rule against Trump and his allies.
What To Know
The judge’s husband, former Democratic state Senator Arnold Goodstein, was among those injured after he reportedly jumped from the house and had to be rescued from a marshy area behind the property, a neighbor said.
The neighbor, Tom Peterson, told The Post and Courier that the judge told him she was walking her dogs on the beach when the home caught fire.Captain K.C. Campbell with the Colleton County Fire Rescue told the outlet that three people had been hospitalized, one of whom was airlifted to the Medical University of South Carolina.
Goodstein issued a ruling last month temporarily blocking South Carolina from handing over millions of voters’ personal data to the Trump administration.
The state’s Republican Governor Henry McMaster and DOJ official Harmeet Dhillon criticized the ruling.
Democratic Representative Daniel Goldman of New York said in a post on X that Republicans including President Donald Trump and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller have been “doxxing and threatening judges who rule against Trump, including Judge Goodstein.”
Miller responded by calling Goldman “deeply warped and vile” and accused him of spreading “libelous madness,” while countering that the Trump administration has launched a “government-wide effort to combat and prosecute illegal doxing.”
In recent weeks, Trump allies have ramped up their criticism of judges they accuse of being politically biased against conservatives.
Miller wrote in a post on X on Saturday that “far-left Democrat judges” were shielding a “large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country.”
And X CEO Elon Musk, who formerly served as a top adviser to Trump, on Sunday shared his agreement to a post which called to impeach “corrupt judges.”
What People Are Saying
A SLED spokesperson told FITSNews: “SLED is investigating a house fire in Colleton County. The investigation is active and ongoing. More information may be available as the investigation continues.”
The director of communications for Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom, Izzy Gardon, wrote on his personal X account: “A few weeks ago, one of Trump’s top DOJ officials publicly targeted this judge. Today, the judge’s home is on fire.”
Online political commentator Wajahat Ali wrote on X: “.@elonmusk, any thoughts about South Carolina Judge Goodstein’s home burning to the ground in an apparent act of arson that almost killed her family? You just tweeted against judges today, so I’m curious if you feel you engaged in some dangerous hateful rhetoric?”
What Happens Next
An investigation into the fire at Goodstein’s home is ongoing.
Author Archives: M
Atlantic: Stephen Miller Is Going for Broke
The White House aide equates opposition to Trump’s agenda with terrorism—and pushes for the use of state power to suppress it.
Stephen Miller spent his weekend, as he is wont to do, describing American politics as if the nation were in the advanced stages of civil war and as if he were dictating a message while racing to a mountain hideout to escape bloodthirsty guerillas. “There is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded,” he wrote on X. “And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general. The only remedy is to use legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks.”
The provocation for this latest sweaty missive was an unfavorable judicial ruling (by a judge contravening President Donald Trump’s federal takeover of 200 National Guardsmen in Oregon). But violent defiance has become the animating vision through which Miller—and, therefore, on account of his sweeping influence over domestic politics, the Trump administration—views his conflict with Democrats, the media, the judiciary, or any entity that stands in his path.
The most consistent theme in Trump’s career is that any word or deed that he deems contrary to his political interests is illegitimate. Any unfavorable news story is libel, any election he loses is rigged, any unflattering fact pattern is a hoax, and almost anybody who opposes him should be locked up.
Miller’s career was defined, in its early stages, by a fanatical hatred of immigration. Over time, as Miller has emerged as the chief architect of Trump’s second-term agenda, his worldview and Trump’s have blended together.
“The Democrat Party is not a political party,” he said in August. “It is a domestic extremist organization.” Several weeks later, Trump seized on Charlie Kirk’s assassination to depict his own political opponents as accessories to murder. “For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals,” he said, in remarks reportedly written by Miller. “This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now.”
Kirk’s death became the immediate pretext for using state power to crush political opposition. As the shock of that murder has worn off, Miller is shifting to a more durable pretext: the political and legal backlash against Trump’s expansive deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The executive branch certainly has the right, and indeed the obligation, to enforce immigration law. Trump, though, has redefined the boundaries of this enforcement in numerous ways: by detaining people without due process, some of whom have inevitably turned out to be citizens; by seizing law-enforcement powers from states and localities; by employing masked agents who don’t always identify their agency, and who have frequently attacked journalists and bystanders.
These actions have generated public pushback, and even isolated and horrifying acts of violence—but hardly an insurrection. As the ruling turning down Trump’s demand to federalize law enforcement in Oregon notes, the administration’s assertion that Portland is in a state of revolution musters a total of four episodes of threatening behavior by protesters to justify this claim. One of the incidents is “protesters setting up a makeshift guillotine to intimidate federal officials.” Another was “someone posting a photograph of an unmarked ICE vehicle online.” The other two involved flashlights being shone in the faces of agents driving vehicles. These incidents may be regrettable, but they do not even constitute actual violence, let alone terrorism.
In the Miller-Trump formulation, however, Trump embodies both the public will and the only force standing between the public and rampant criminal anarchy. It follows that opposition to Trump in any form, including by judges issuing legal rulings, constitutes an illegal rebellion. “The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge. Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life,” Miller asserted on X. “This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers, and the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself.”
Trump’s remarks on the night of Kirk’s murder redefined violent incitement to include harsh criticism of judges. (“My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law-enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country.”) Now Miller himself is going after judges.
To call this “hypocrisy” is to engage Miller’s reasoning at a level upon which it does not operate. The essence of post-liberalism is the rejection of the notion that some neutral standards of conduct apply to all parties. Miller, like Trump, appears to believe his side stands for what is right and good, and his opponents stand for what is evil. Any methods used by Trump are ipso facto justified, and any methods used against him illegitimate.
A couple of weeks ago, Miller claimed that a disturbed gunman shooting Charlie Kirk impelled the government to crack down on the left. Now he says a handful of activists protesting ICE impel the government to crack down on the left.
Violence is not the cause of Trump and Miller’s desire to use state power to crush their opposition. It is the pretext for which they transparently long.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/10/miller-insurrection/684463
Daily Mail: Hundreds of thousands of Americans ‘may lose disability benefits as Trump plans to overhaul Social Security’
A new report has emerged, alleging that the Trump administration is considering removing a key factor from the assessment of an individual’s eligibility for Social Security disability payments.
The Washington Post reported Sunday that the Trump administration is reportedly preparing a plan to significantly change how older individuals qualify for Social Security disability benefits.
White House spokesman Kush Desai told the Daily Mail that ‘President Trump will always protect and defend Social Security for American citizens.
‘The only policy change to Social Security is President Trump’s working families tax cut legislation that eliminated taxation of Social Security for almost all beneficiaries – which every single Democrat voted against,’ Desai added.
According to individuals who spoke with the Washington Post, the proposal would make it harder for older workers to qualify for the benefits, and the change could impact hundreds of thousands of Americans.
This change is also supposedly one of many being considered by the administration in an effort to overhaul the federal safety net for older, poor, and disabled individuals.
The Social Security Administration currently evaluates disability claims by considering a person’s age, education, and work experience to determine if someone can adjust to various kinds of work.
Older applicants, typically those over age 50, have historically been more likely to qualify, as age has been considered a factor that limits a person’s ability to transition to new types of employment.
Under the proposed plan, officials are reportedly considering either removing age as a factor altogether or raising the threshold to 60 years of age. According to three individuals familiar with the proposal who spoke on condition of anonymity, this change would represent one of the most significant shifts in how disability claims are evaluated in decades.
The administration is also reported to be working on modernizing the labor market data used in these assessments. The current database, long criticized as outdated, still includes obsolete jobs such as ‘nut sorter’ and ‘telephone quotation clerk.’ Following a 2022 Washington Post investigation that highlighted these issues, officials are now seeking to replace the old data with more current labor statistics that reflect today’s job market.
Experts say it is difficult to estimate exactly how many people could lose access to benefits under these proposed rule changes.
However, a recent analysis by Jack Smalligan, a senior policy fellow at the Urban Institute and former Office of Management and Budget official, suggested that if eligibility were reduced by just 10 percent, about 750,000 people could lose benefits over the next decade.
Additionally, about 80,000 widows and children could lose benefits tied to a disabled spouse or parent.
Smalligan noted that many older Americans who apply for disability benefits often struggle to find new employment. If age were no longer considered, more individuals might opt for early retirement instead, resulting in permanently reduced monthly payments.
The initiative is reportedly being led by Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, who has long sought to revise disability rules. Supporters argue that longer lifespans and less physically demanding work justify tightening eligibility, while critics warn the move could leave vulnerable Americans without needed support.
The Daily Mail reached out to the Office of Management and Budget, as well as contacts for the U.S. Senate Finance and Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committees for comment outside of regular business hours.
President Trump has repeatedly pledged not to touch entitlement payments despite significant pushes by him and his allies to cut spending across various areas of government.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15163927/disability-benefits-Trump-Social-Security.html
CBS News: Growing tensions with ICE agents in Chicago
For weeks now, armed federal agents, some in full tactical gear, have been patrolling downtown Chicago. Ash-har Quraishi reports on Operation Midway Blitz.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/topstories/growing-tensions-with-ice-agents-in-chicago/vi-AA1NV0Xa
MSNBC: Trump says ICE targets the ‘worst of the worst.’ Reality tells a different story.
NPR immigration reporter Jasmine Garsd joins The Weekend: Primetime to discuss how children have been increasingly caught up in Trump’s immigration crackdown despite his claim that ICE would target the “worst of the worst.” She also explains how the administration’s rhetoric and tactics have signaled “a chance in American identity.”
Slingshot News: ‘They’ll Be Struggling’: Trump Owns Up To His Economic Failures, Admits Tariffs Will Destroy Farmers In Oval Office Signing Event
Donald Trump signed a batch of executive orders in the Oval Office several days ago. During his remarks, Trump admitted that farmers will be struggling due to his tariffs until the so-called “transition” is complete. Never learning from his past mistakes, Trump brought up the idea of bailing out farmers again.
New York Times: Pritzker Says Federal Agents Are Trying to Make Chicago a ‘War Zone’
Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois said he had ordered state agencies to investigate a raid on a Chicago apartment building where there had been reports of “nearly naked” children zip-tied by federal officers.
Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois blasted recent federal immigration enforcement efforts in Chicago on Sunday, dismissing assertions by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem that the city was a “war zone” and blaming federal agents for escalating a sense of conflict.
“The secretary doesn’t know what she’s talking about,” the governor said in an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union,” adding that Chicagoans were “booing her on the street.”
Mr. Pritzker singled out a late-night Border Patrol raid last week at an apartment building on Chicago’s South Side, when video taken by bystanders showed residents of the building restrained with zip ties.
Federal agents were “just picking up people who are brown and Black and then checking their credentials,” Mr. Pritzker said. He added: “They are the ones that are making it a war zone. They need to get out of Chicago if they’re not going to focus on the worst of the worst, which is what the president said they were going to do.”
Mr. Pritzker suggested that the Trump administration, which plans to send 300 National Guard troops to Chicago, was intentionally heightening tensions. The administration wants to “create the war zone so they can send in even more troops,” he said.
Mr. Pritzker said he had directed state agencies to investigate what happened at the apartment building, citing reports of “children who were zip-tied and held, some of them nearly naked” and “elderly people being thrown into a U-Haul for three hours and detained.” Mr. Pritzker added he believed that some of the people were U.S. citizens.
“What kind of a country are we living in?” he said.
The governor also said he wanted to know more about an episode in Chicago on Saturday when a federal agent shot and wounded a motorist who, according to federal officials, had rammed and boxed-in a law enforcement vehicle.
“It’s really hard to know exactly what the facts are, and they won’t let us access the facts,” Mr. Pritzker said. “They are just putting out their propaganda. And then we’ve got to later determine what actually happened.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/05/us/politics/pritzker-chicago-immigration.html
Slingshot News: ‘I Moved A Submarine Or Two’: Trump Puts His Incompetence On Display, Brags About Flirting With A Nuclear Conflict During Self-Absorbed Tirade
During his remarks at the Department of War this month, Trump bragged about flirting with a nuclear conflict with Russia. Trump stated, “I moved a submarine or two.”
ABC News: Tensions rise amid anti-ICE protests in Chicago
State Rep. Lilian Jimenez joins ABC News Live to discuss the Trump administration’s decision to send 300 National Guard troops to Chicago.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tensions-rise-amid-anti-ice-protests-in-chicago/vi-AA1NUa5l
Block Club Chicago: South Shore Residents Return To Ransacked Apartments After ICE Raid: ‘It Looks Like Hell’
A “now renting” sign outside touts granite countertops. Inside, residents are trying to make sense of the raid that made their already neglected building even worse.
He’s an Army veteran now retired after three decades working for the U.S. Postal Service.
Federal agents pounded on the door of his South Shore apartment about 2 a.m. Tuesday.
“I told them they must have the wrong apartment,” the man said.
But armed agents busted open many doors after arriving in U-Haul trucks to raid the 130-unit apartment building at 7500 S. South Shore Drive. They woke up residents to handcuff them with zip ties and led them into unmarked vans.
Rodrick Johnson, a U.S. citizen, said he heard “people dropping on the roof” before FBI agents kicked in his door. He was stuffed inside a van with his neighbors for what felt like several hours until agents told them the building was clear, he said.
“They didn’t tell me why I was being detained,” Johnson said. “They left people’s doors open, firearms, money, whatever, right there in the open.”
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said federal agencies arrested at least 37 people in the operation at the building, which they claimed is frequented by members of Venezulan gang Tren de Aragua. About 300 federal agents, some landing on the roof from helicopters, descended upon the building, according to NewsNation, which was invited along for the operation.
The report didn’t mention women and children appear to be among the detained, said Brandon Lee, a spokesman with the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. Organizers worry many people were taken without warrants.
“These were families with their children escorted out in the middle of the night,” Lee said. “This administration is using PR efforts to try to turn communities against their neighbors.”
Residents said the building had become home to Venezuelan migrants. The raid saw people’s apartments turned upside down, citizens held for hours and their neighbors taken away to unknown places. Belongings were stolen from apartments after the agents left the building open.
The Army veteran, who went blind recently and asked not use his name, said the agents moved on to the next apartment after coming to his home.
“I was trying to protect myself,” he said. “My nerves were shook.”
By Wednesday afternoon, the building appeared largely abandoned by residents.
Unsigned waivers allowing DHS to disclose “records about you to a third party” were on front gates near “Know Your Rights” flyers. Broken windows scattered the property. Anyone could just walk in.
Dan Jones stood outside with police officers to file a report after his valuables — from his mattress and iPad down to his air fryer — were stolen after agents broke his door.
Jones slept at an aunt’s house following the raid and returned to find clothing and garbage that wasn’t his all over his apartment floor.
A small moving crew said they had been hired after the raid to clear out now-vacant units — but didn’t say by who. Doors were boarded up. In one room, there were zip ties and blood stains on the floor next to baby shoes. Flies swarmed around open fridges.
Water damage had caved in ceilings. Strollers and air conditioners and more things left behind blocked the middle of dark hallways. The lobby elevators were broken, with their buttons perpetually lit on the down arrow.
There was a strong odor everywhere.
Jones said the building’s “dirty” conditions predated the raid, but this was the worst he’d seen the place. It was the first of the month and his rent was due.
“It looks like hell,” Jones said. “ICE really just a gang.”
Jones said he’d been cordial with the Venezuelans who moved onto his floor.
“They were cool people,” Jones said. “We took it upon ourselves to at least keep it clean over here.”
Residents said problems at the property started after a new management company was brought on over a year ago. Cleanings became less regular, and two armed security guards were removed, they said.
That led to squatters, Jones said.
The Army veteran was guided through the mess in the lobby Wednesday by a caretaker. He couldn’t see the worst of it. The former postman complained of his mail being routinely stolen — and that he’ll have to keep living in the building as he tries to find somewhere else.
“It was a good place to live when I first got here,” he said.
The building’s ownership traces back to Wisconsin-based investor Trinity Flood, according to public records. Flood is facing a $27 million foreclosure lawsuit for not making loan payments on three South Shore properties she bought for $18 million in 2020, according to The Real Deal.
The city also filed suit in February against Flood’s LLCs for over 15 building code violations at the South Shore Drive property dating back to 2023, seeking that it be put under receivership, according to court records. The building failed its past 14 annual inspections, according to data from the city’s Department of Buildings.
“Building throughout has fire extinguishers that are missing,” city lawyers wrote in its legal complaint. “All stairways are filthy with strong smell of urine.”
Flood could not be reached, and the building’s management company, Strength In Management, did not return requests for comment.
The property was most recently estimated at an under $3 million market value, according to the Cook County Assessor’s Office. An online listing has it up for sale for more than $15 million as part of a “Jackson Park Portfolio” with two other South Shore buildings. The listing agent, Finley Askin, did not return a request for comment.
“Capital improvements to the portfolio consist of updated electric/plumbing, newer windows, on-site laundry, and renovated units,” the listing reads.
A “now renting” sign outside lists a number for Safe Harbor Reality, but agent Curtis Krolak said the company hasn’t managed the property in over two years.
“They never took it down,” Krolak said.
Since June, police have reported multiple gun crimes in the 7400 and 7500 blocks of South South Shore Drive, including two homicides, a shooting and two armed robberies, according to city data.
City crime outlet CWB reported that Jose Coronado-Meza, 25, accused of being a Tren de Aragua member, was charged with murder in June, with officials saying he killed another migrant inside the building.
Jonah Karsh, a community organizer with Metropolitan Tenants Organization, had tried to unionize tenants in August 2024 after a gas leak left some without functional stoves for over a month.
“The conditions were deplorable before the raid and have only deteriorated,” Karsh said. “The management was primarily responsible for failing to maintain the property and security.”
Walls on the building’s second floor were spray-painted with “Venezuela,” but it was unclear when. Many of the floor’s units had broken doors and appeared to be home to young children.
South Shore had been a landing spot for many Venezuelans when tens of thousands of migrants were bused from the southern border to Chicago and other Democrat-led cities.
“People stayed at shelters there and then found apartments,” Lee said.
At one point, migrants who received help through a state rental assistance program were living in the building, Karsh said. That funding was set to run out within months.
Karsh has kept contact with leasing tenants who did not have their doors broken or marked during the raid.
Those residents have since been sent instructions about receiving new keys.
“As of today, all points of entry to the building will be secured,” a Strength in Management employee wrote in an email. “Keys will be delivered to active tenants.”
Jones’ eyes welled with tears as he looked around his destroyed apartment. He wants to move. Rebuilding will be harder.
“My place was nice,” he said.
On his way out, he still tried to close the door.

South Shore Residents Return To Ransacked Apartments After ICE Raid: ‘It Looks Like Hell‘