Huffington Post: Roger Stone Suggests Democratic Senator Should Face ‘Execution’ After He Criticized Trump’s Crypto Ventures

Roger Stone, a longtime ally of President Donald Trump, suggested Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) should face “execution” after the lawmaker questioned Trump’s recent business ventures into cryptocurrency.

“Trump is cashing in on his presidency and making millions from his own crypto coins. It’s corruption in broad daylight,” Kelly wrote on X Wednesday, promoting the “End Crypto Corruption Act,” which he said would make it illegal for “the President, the Vice President, administration officials, and members of Congress to issue, sponsor, or endorse crypto assets for profit.”

Howsabout execution for corrupt politicians? Yeah!

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/roger-stone-mark-kelly-trump-crypto-treason-execution_n_681f7231e4b06987bce11e44

USA Today: Electronics company posts bill with over $36K tariff charge, announces price increases

An electronic hardware company explained to customers why its prices will increase soon after sharing its latest bill, which included a $36,126.46 tariff charge.

Adafruit Industries said its import bill has grown over the past two months, but it just got hit with its first “big bill.” Products were booked and manufactured through a vendor many months ago, ahead of the tariffs President Donald Trump imposed on various countries, including a 145% one on China.

Unexpected bills like this will put a lot of small companies out of business.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/05/09/electronics-company-import-tariff-charge/83535500007

Law & Crime: ‘Not just incorrect’: Judge decimates DOJ’s ‘bad faith’ and ‘unreasonable’ effort to toss Jan. 6 defendant’s gun case over Trump pardon

A federal judge in Baltimore pointedly rejected joint efforts by the government and a Jan. 6 defendant to apply President Donald Trump’s mass pardon to a related but discrete gun crime case.

In a 19-page memorandum and order, U.S. District Judge James Kelleher Bredar, a Barack Obama appointee, found several basic arguments wholly unconvincing. The judge also found one of the more complex arguments a bit underdeveloped and directed the parties to file additional motions, offering one last chance.

The court was, however, withering in its estimation of the government’s efforts to have the case dismissed so far.

“[A]s the record currently stands, the Court is unable to conclude that the Government is not acting in bad faith, and the parties will be directed to provide additional briefing,” Bredar intoned.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/not-just-incorrect-judge-decimates-doj-s-bad-faith-and-unreasonable-effort-to-toss-jan-6-defendant-s-gun-case-over-trump-pardon/ar-AA1EuQ5b

Moneywise: Trump wants to ‘abolish’ the IRS and replace federal income tax revenue with tariffs on imports — how would such a move affect middle-class Americans?

“Donald Trump announced the External Revenue Service, and his goal is very simple: to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and let all the outsiders pay,” U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News on Feb. 19. The idea is that once the budget is balanced, taxes will be waived for Americans earning less than $150,000 a year.

However, the flaw in this plan is that tariffs are not paid by “outsiders.” Rather, tariffs are a tax placed on imported goods and services.

“When the U.S. imposes tariffs on imports, businesses in the United States directly pay import taxes to the U.S. government on their purchases from abroad,” according to the Tax Foundation. During Trump’s first term, “the economic evidence shows American firms and consumers were hardest hit by the Trump tariffs.”

At the same time, it would be hard to replace the revenue collected from income taxes with revenue from the planned tariffs. According to a study by the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), a non-partisan research group, the U.S. imported $3.1 trillion in goods in 2023 while raising about $2 trillion through individual and corporate income taxes.

This means it would be nearly impossible to replace income taxes with tariffs, since the tariff rate would have to be “implausibly high,” according to PIIE. The institute determined that even at a “revenue-maximizing tariff rate,” the U.S. could raise only a fraction of what it raises with income taxes.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/taxes/trump-wants-to-abolish-the-irs-and-replace-federal-income-tax-revenue-with-tariffs-on-imports-how-would-such-a-move-affect-middle-class-americans/ar-AA1Et0kV

Raw Story: ‘Political life or death’: Analyst warns GOP at risk as Trump flip flops on core principle

Punchbowl News reporter Jake Sherman is hearing from members of Congress that President Donald Trump’s willingness to raise taxes on the super wealthy is causing a stink on Capitol Hill.

Speaking to MSNBC’s Katie Tur on Friday, Sherman mentioned a Trump post on Truth Social in which he said that Republicans “probably should not” raise taxes — “but I’m OK if they do!!!”

Taxes on the super wealthy? Raise ’em high! Throw in a wealth tax while you’re at it!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/political-life-or-death-analyst-warns-gop-at-risk-as-trump-flip-flops-on-core-principle/ar-AA1EuWgL

People: J.D. Vance Justifies Tariffs by Promising Parents Their Kids Will Have American-Made Weapons if ‘God Forbid’ They Go to War

Vice President J.D. Vance is speaking out in defense of President Donald Trump‘s tariffs — including his statements about children needing fewer toys — by arguing that Americans could benefit from using American-made weapons if “God forbid … your country goes to a war.”

During an interview with Fox News host Martha MacCallum on Thursday, May 8, Vance, 40, spoke out about Trump’s comments about his tariffs on goods from China, and said that Americans “need to become more self-reliant.”

“That’s not going to happen overnight, and it’s not always going to be easy,” Vance told MacCallum. “What I’d ask people is not whether they want two dolls or five dolls or 20 dolls for their kids. I’d ask American moms and dads, would you like to be able to go into a pharmacy and know that the drugs your kids need are actually available to you?”

“As an American parent, would you like to — God forbid, if your country goes to a war and your son or daughter is sent off to fight—would you like to know that the weapons that they have are good, American-made stuff, not made by a foreign adversary?” Vance continued.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/j-d-vance-justifies-tariffs-by-promising-parents-their-kids-will-have-american-made-weapons-if-god-forbid-they-go-to-war/ar-AA1EuUmI

CNN: Judge halts drastic cuts to agencies being done under Trump executive order

A federal judge is halting the Trump administration from carrying out, under a February executive order, mass firings or major reorganizations of multiple agencies going forward.

Senior District Judge Susan Illston on Friday evening granted a temporary restraining order sought by federal employee unions, local governments and outside organizations that rely on federal services, who argued the administration was acting outside the bounds of the law. The judge’s order, which lasts two weeks, blocks the administration’s approval or implementation of plans –- known as Agency RIF and Reorganization Plans, or ARRPs – for conducting mass layoffs and for shrinking or eliminating entire components of an agency. She is also pausing any orders from the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, cutting programs or staff in accordance with Trump’s executive order and the related directives.

Illston, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton who sits in San Francisco, said at a hearing earlier in the day that presidents have authority to make changes to the government, but when it comes to large scale reorganizations, presidents “must do so with the cooperation of Congress.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-halts-drastic-cuts-to-agencies-being-done-under-trump-executive-order/ar-AA1Ev3KN

Fortune: Trump calls emptying U.S. ports a ‘good thing’ despite supply-chain panic because ‘that means we lose less money’

As logistics professionals sound the alarms on emptying U.S. ports as a result of steep tariffs, President Donald Trump said those major import slowdowns are actually a boon.

Trump not only acknowledged the shipping slowdown in a Thursday press briefing announcing a trade deal with the UK; he seemed heartened by it.

“We’re seeing as a result that ports here in the U.S., the traffic has really slowed and now thousands of dockworkers and truck drivers are worried about their jobs,” a reporter said in the press briefing.

“That means we lose less money,” Trump said. “When you say it slowed down, that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.”

Trump is deranged!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-calls-emptying-u-ports-180609056.html

Raw Story: ‘Who holds the power?’ Defenders of Trump in criminal cases turn on him in court filing

A group of conservative legal heavyweights — including some who once defended Donald Trump against his criminal prosecutions — are now urging a federal judge to strike down the former president’s sweeping tariff policy.

“Congress, not the president, has the power to impose tariffs,” they wrote in an amicus brief filed this week in a lawsuit brought by two small businesses that design educational toys and pet items, NOTUS reported Friday. The brief was signed by a total of 14 lawyers and former officials, including Federalist Society co-chair Steven Calabresi and former Attorney General Edwin Meese III, the publication added.

“This dispute is not about the wisdom of tariffs or the politics of trade,” the group wrote. “It is about who holds the power to tax the American people.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/who-holds-the-power-defenders-of-trump-in-criminal-cases-turn-on-him-in-court-filing/ar-AA1EuOAS

Politico: Judges have a warning about Trump’s rapid deportations: Americans could be next

A fundamental promise by America’s founders — that no one should be punished by the state without a fair hearing — is under threat, a growing chorus of federal judges say.

That concept of “due process under law,” borrowed from the Magna Carta and enshrined in the Bill of Rights, is most clearly imperiled for the immigrants President Donald Trump intends to summarily deport, they say, but U.S. citizens should be wary, too.

Across the country, judges appointed by presidents of both parties — including Trump himself — are escalating warnings about what they see as an erosion of due process caused by the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign. What started with a focus on people Trump has deemed “terrorists” and “gang members” — despite their fierce denials — could easily expand to other groups, including Americans, these judges warn.

“When the courts say due process is important, we’re not unhinged, we’re not radicals,” U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, a Washington, D.C.-based appointee of President Joe Biden, said at a recent hearing. “We are literally trying to enforce a process embodied in probably the most significant document with respect to peoples’ rights against tyrannical government oppression. That’s what we’re doing here. Okay?”

It’s a fight that judges are increasingly casting as existential, rooted in the 5th Amendment’s guarantee that “no person shall … be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.” The word “person,” courts have noted, makes no distinction between citizens or noncitizens. The Supreme Court has long held that this fundamental promise extends to immigrants in deportation proceedings. In a 1993 opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia called that principle “well-established.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/judges-have-a-warning-about-trump-s-rapid-deportations-americans-could-be-next/ar-AA1EvZfM